Zurück zur Übersicht

Üben mit Coaches

Wenn du dich auf ein Case-Interview vorbereitest, insbesondere unter Zeitdruck, kann die Zusammenarbeit mit einem erfahrenen Coach deine Erfolgschancen erheblich steigern.

💡 Pro Tipp: Auf PrepLounge hast du Zugang zu über 800 (ehemaligen) Berater:innen von führenden Unternehmen wie McKinsey, BCG und Bain, die dir helfen, deine Interviewtechnik zu perfektionieren.

Was sind die Hauptvorteile des Übens mit einem Coach?

Hauptvorteile des Übens mit einem Coach

Personalisiertes Feedback

Einer der Hauptvorteile der Zusammenarbeit mit einem Coach ist das Erhalten von maßgeschneidertem Feedback. Im Gegensatz zu allgemeinen Vorbereitungsmethoden kann ein Coach deine spezifischen Schwächen erkennen und dir gezielte Ratschläge geben, um dich zu verbessern. Dieser persönliche Ansatz stellt sicher, dass deine Vorbereitung effizient und zielgerichtet ist und deine individuellen Bedürfnisse berücksichtigt.

Realistische Simulation

Das Üben mit einem Coach ermöglicht es dir, eine realistische Interviewsituation zu erleben. Coaches, die zahlreiche Case Interviews durchgeführt haben, können den Druck und die Dynamik eines echten Interviews simulieren, wodurch du dich wohler und sicherer fühlst. Diese Erfahrung ist unbezahlbar, da sie dich darauf vorbereitet, den Stress und die Spontanität echter Interviews zu bewältigen.

Insiderwissen

Alle Coaches auf PrepLounge kommen selbst aus renommierten Beratungsunternehmen. Ihr Insiderwissen darüber, wonach Top-Unternehmen suchen, kann dir einen erheblichen Vorteil verschaffen. Sie können dir Einblicke in den Interviewprozess, häufige Fallstricke und die spezifischen Eigenschaften, die Unternehmen schätzen, geben, sodass du gut vorbereitet bist, diese Erwartungen zu erfüllen.

Strukturierter Ansatz

Ein Coach kann dir helfen, einen strukturierten Ansatz zur Lösung von Case-Problemen zu entwickeln. Diese strukturierte Denkweise ist in Case Interviews entscheidend, wo klare, logische und gut organisierte Antworten hoch geschätzt werden. Coaches können dir Frameworks und Methoden beibringen, die deinen Problemlösungsprozess vereinfachen und deine Antworten kohärenter und überzeugender machen.

Zeiteffizienz

Für Kandidat:innen mit begrenzter Vorbereitungszeit ist Coaching eine äußerst effiziente Methode, um sich vorzubereiten. Coaches können schnell Bereiche identifizieren, die verbessert werden müssen, und dir helfen, deine Anstrengungen auf die am meisten benötigten Bereiche zu konzentrieren. Diese gezielte Vorbereitung kann dir Zeit sparen und dir helfen, schneller voranzukommen, als du es alleine tun würdest.

Selbstvertrauen steigern

Selbstvertrauen spielt eine entscheidende Rolle bei der Interviewleistung. Regelmäßiges Training mit einem Coach kann dein Selbstvertrauen stärken, indem es dich mit dem Interviewformat vertraut macht und dir hilft, deine Antworten zu verfeinern. Zu wissen, dass du dich gründlich mit fachkundiger Anleitung vorbereitet hast, kann die Angst erheblich reduzieren und deine Gesamtleistung verbessern.

 

Wie dich PrepLounge mit vielfältigen Coaching-Optionen optimal unterstützt

🚀 Flexibilität und genau das, was zu dir passt

PrepLounge bietet verschiedene Coaching-Optionen, die zu deinen Bedürfnissen und Vorlieben passen. Du kannst aus Einzelsessions, CV Reviews oder umfassenden Coaching-Paketen wählen, die mehrere Sitzungen umfassen oder sich auf bestimmte Themen konzentrieren. Darüber hinaus gibt es Programme, die eine Premium-Mitgliedschaft mit Coaching-Credits und weiteren Coachingelementen wie Workshops oder Gruppencoachings kombinieren und eine kostengünstige Möglichkeit bieten, erstklassige Coaching-Dienste in Anspruch zu nehmen.

📅 Workshops und Online-Events

PrepLounge veranstaltet auch regelmäßig Workshops und Online-Events, die von erfahrenen Coaches geleitet werden. Diese Sitzungen decken eine Vielzahl von Themen ab und bieten Möglichkeiten für interaktives Lernen und direktes Feedback. Die Teilnahme an diesen Events kann deine Vorbereitung weiter verbessern und dich über die neuesten Trends und Techniken in Case Interviews auf dem Laufenden halten.

 

Wie du den perfekten Coach findest, der zu deinen Bedürfnissen passt

Um den perfekten Coach für deine Case-Interview Vorbereitung zu finden, kannst du in drei Schritten vorgehen:

3 Schritte, um den perfekten Coach zu finden.
  1. Filtern: Filtere die Coaches in der Coach-Übersicht nach deinen wichtigsten Kriterien, wie Preis pro Coaching-Sitzung oder beruflichem Hintergrund.
  2. Auswahl eingrenzen: Wähle bis zu 10 Coaches aus, deren Profile, Bewertungen, Q&A-Beiträge und PrepLounge-Awards du näher erkunden möchtest.
  3. Kontaktieren: Kontaktiere 2-3 Coaches, um potenzielle Fragen oder Bedenken zu klären. Frage ruhig, ob sie ein kostenloses Einführungsgespräch anbieten.

 

Was macht einen guten Coach aus?

Gute Coaches zeichnen sich durch folgende Merkmale aus:

  • Individuelle Anpassung: Sie passen das Coaching an deine spezifischen Bedürfnisse an.
  • Gute Beziehung: Sie sorgen dafür, dass du dich wohlfühlst und gut mit ihnen zusammenarbeiten kannst.
  • Transparenz: Sie bieten dir volle Transparenz über den Coaching-Prozess auf PrepLounge.

 

Abschließende Überlegungen zur Zusammenarbeit mit einem Coach:

Das Lernen mit einem Coach ist eine strategische Investition in deine Case-Interview-Vorbereitung. Das individuelle Feedback, die realistische Simulation, das Insiderwissen und der Vertrauensschub, den Coaches bieten, können einen erheblichen Unterschied in deiner Leistung ausmachen. Mit der fachkundigen Anleitung, die auf PrepLounge verfügbar ist, kannst du sicherstellen, dass du gründlich vorbereitet und bereit bist, in deinen Case-Interviews zu glänzen.

Durch die Nutzung der Expertise erfahrener Coaches, die Auswahl des perfekten Coaches und die Inanspruchnahme der vielfältigen Coaching-Optionen und Events auf PrepLounge kannst du deine Vorbereitungseffizienz maximieren, dein Selbstvertrauen stärken und deine Chancen erhöhen, eine Position bei einem Top-Beratungsunternehmen zu sichern.

 

Wirf einen Blick auf unsere Coaches

Francesco
Francesco
5,0
1.712 Bewertungen
Englisch, Italienisch, Spanisch
Vereinigte Arabische Emirate (UTC +4)
Francesco
Consulting
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success: ➡ interviewoffers.com | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success: ➡ interviewoffers.com | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching
Englisch, Italienisch, Spanisch
Vereinigte Arabische Emirate (UTC +4)
999 USD / Stunde
4.728 Coachings
59.490 Q&A Upvotes
489 Awards
999 USD / Stunde
Hagen
Hagen
5,0
1.167 Bewertungen
Deutsch, Englisch
Deutschland (UTC +2)
Hagen
Consulting
Premium + Coaching
Globally top-ranked MBB coach | >95% success rate | 9+ years consulting, interviewing and coaching experience
Globally top-ranked MBB coach | >95% success rate | 9+ years consulting, interviewing and coaching experience
Deutsch, Englisch
Deutschland (UTC +2)
329 USD / Stunde
1.504 Coachings
41.814 Q&A Upvotes
198 Awards
329 USD / Stunde
Florian
Florian
5,0
640 Bewertungen
Deutsch, Englisch
Österreich (UTC +2)
Florian
Consulting
1600 5-star reviews across platforms | 700+ offers | Highest-rated case book on Amazon | Uni lecturer in US, Asia, EU
1600 5-star reviews across platforms | 700+ offers | Highest-rated case book on Amazon | Uni lecturer in US, Asia, EU
Deutsch, Englisch
Österreich (UTC +2)
399 USD / Stunde
1.445 Coachings
40.211 Q&A Upvotes
199 Awards
399 USD / Stunde
Casper
Casper
5,0
208 Bewertungen
Englisch, Polnisch
Philippinen (UTC +8)
Casper
Consulting
Premium + Coaching
1st session: -50% | Ex-Bain, Big 4 Recruiter | 12 yrs coaching | Great Price/Value | Free Intro Calls | Written Cases
1st session: -50% | Ex-Bain, Big 4 Recruiter | 12 yrs coaching | Great Price/Value | Free Intro Calls | Written Cases
Englisch, Polnisch
Philippinen (UTC +8)
189 USD / Stunde
1.151 Coachings
8 Q&A Upvotes
68 Awards
189 USD / Stunde
Cristian
Cristian
5,0
379 Bewertungen
Englisch
Deutschland (UTC +2)
Cristian
Consulting
Most awarded MBB coach on the platform | verified 88% success rate | ex-McKinsey | Oxford | worked with ~400 candidates
Most awarded MBB coach on the platform | verified 88% success rate | ex-McKinsey | Oxford | worked with ~400 candidates
Englisch
Deutschland (UTC +2)
379 USD / Stunde
1.067 Coachings
58.255 Q&A Upvotes
233 Awards
379 USD / Stunde
Benjamin
Benjamin
5,0
91 Bewertungen
Englisch
Singapur (Singapore) (UTC +8)
Benjamin
Consulting
Premium + Coaching
Ex-BCG Principal | 8+ years consulting experience in SEA | BCG top interviewer & top performer
Ex-BCG Principal | 8+ years consulting experience in SEA | BCG top interviewer & top performer
Englisch
Singapur (Singapore) (UTC +8)
279 USD / Stunde
567 Coachings
15.247 Q&A Upvotes
83 Awards
279 USD / Stunde
Alessandro
Alessandro
5,0
11 Bewertungen
Englisch, Indonesisch, Italienisch
Indonesien (UTC +7)
Alessandro
Consulting
McKinsey Senior Engagement Manager | Interviewer Lead | 1,000+ real MBB interviews | 2026 Solve, PEI, AI-case specialist
McKinsey Senior Engagement Manager | Interviewer Lead | 1,000+ real MBB interviews | 2026 Solve, PEI, AI-case specialist
Englisch, Indonesisch, Italienisch
Indonesien (UTC +7)
159 USD / Stunde
12 Coachings
2.640 Q&A Upvotes
6 Awards
159 USD / Stunde
Tommaso
Tommaso
5,0
2 Bewertungen
Englisch, Italienisch, Portugiesisch, Spanisch
Spanien (UTC +1)
Tommaso
Consulting
Ex-McKinsey | MBA @ Berkeley Haas | No-nonsense coaching | 50% off on the first meeting in April
Ex-McKinsey | MBA @ Berkeley Haas | No-nonsense coaching | 50% off on the first meeting in April
Englisch, Italienisch, Portugiesisch, Spanisch
Spanien (UTC +1)
149 USD / Stunde
4 Coachings
302 Q&A Upvotes
0 Awards
149 USD / Stunde
Vincent
Vincent
5,0
1 Bewertung
Deutsch, Englisch
Schweiz (UTC +2)
Vincent
Consulting
Principal BCG | 60+ projects in all Industries | Munich & Zürich | Ex-Lazard & Berenberg
Principal BCG | 60+ projects in all Industries | Munich & Zürich | Ex-Lazard & Berenberg
Deutsch, Englisch
Schweiz (UTC +2)
149 USD / Stunde
1 Coaching
30 Q&A Upvotes
0 Awards
149 USD / Stunde
Thabang
Thabang
5,0
177 Bewertungen
Englisch
Vereinigtes Königreich (UTC +2)
Thabang
Consulting
Top Rated McKinsey Coach | Ex-McKinsey | Top MBB Coach |
Top Rated McKinsey Coach | Ex-McKinsey | Top MBB Coach |
Englisch
Vereinigtes Königreich (UTC +2)
199 USD / Stunde
405 Coachings
6.811 Q&A Upvotes
20 Awards
199 USD / Stunde

Stöbere durch die Coaching-Pakete

Path to Consulting Package
Path to Consulting Package
5,0
27 Bewertungen
5 maßgeschneiderte Sessions
Personal Fit & Case Mastery
Erste Prinzipien zum richtigen Denken
5 maßgeschneiderte Sessions
Personal Fit & Case Mastery
Erste Prinzipien zum richtigen Denken
Coaching-Angebot „The 1% Case Method“ von Dr. Florian Smeritschnig, ex-McKinsey. Schachmotiv mit Fokus auf individuelle Vorbereitung für Top-Consulting-Jobs.
The 1% Case Method
The 1% Case Method
5,0
63 Bewertungen
Intuitive Case und Fit Mastery
Unvergleichliche Angebotspreise
$1.877 Bonus-Übungsmaterialien
Intuitive Case und Fit Mastery
Unvergleichliche Angebotspreise
$1.877 Bonus-Übungsmaterialien
Coaching-Programm 'Prepped and Primed 3' von Ian – eine Hand hält ein leeres Polaroid-Rahmenbild vor einer Naturkulisse mit Felsen und Wasser.
Prepped and Primed 3
Prepped and Primed 3
5,0
31 Bewertungen
3 1-on-1 Coaching Sessions
Vollständig maßgeschneidert und individuell
Inklusive 100+ Videokurse
3 1-on-1 Coaching Sessions
Vollständig maßgeschneidert und individuell
Inklusive 100+ Videokurse

Finde interessante Einblicke von Coaches im Consulting Q&A

Can you get rejected after the first interview in the first round with BCG?
9 Min
< 100
2
Profilbild von Franco
Beste Antwort von
Franco
Hi, Short answer: no in practice, candidates are not rejected after a single interview within the first round. In my experience  (having conducted many interviews), decisions are made after completing all interviews in the round, not midway. In theory  extreme cases could exist (e.g., a candidate being clearly unfit), but I’ve never personally seen it happen. On structure, most interviews follow a similar format: fit/PEI  + case +your questions, but there is some flexibility: Each interviewer decides how to split the time Cases can vary (quantitative vs qualitative, with or without charts, conventional vs more open-ended) The more senior the interviewer, the more variability you may see; in later rounds, some may even keep the case shorter and more discussion-based On rejection:it’s important to remember that rejection is the norm; ~90% of candidates don’t pass.That said, candidates  are rarely rejected for a single small issue. You are assessed on a full set of skills; one mistake alone  usually does not lead to rejection, it’s an overall evaluation.  More typically, rejection comes from: Lack of clear structure or inability to drive the case Weak communication (not necessarily language; more about clarity and logic) Difficulty extracting insights from data and linking back to the question On your specific concern: being a non-native speaker is not a problem per se. What matters is: being clear and structured taking a moment to think before speaking communicating your logic step by step English is important, but expectations can vary quite a bit depending on the office. WHat office/location are you applying to? Hope this helps, and good luck with your preparation! If you want to go deeper, feel free to DM me Best, Franco
Q&A ansehen
How much would you charge to clean all the windows in Seattle?
35 Min
21,2k
50
Profilbild von Antonello
Beste Antwort von
Antonello
It is one of the most popular Fermi questions and you could face it during the 1st round, when math and problem-solving skills are usually tested deeply. I will propose a quick solution, in order to give later some detailed considerations. Let's estimate the number of windows in Seattle. No. of residents in Seattle: you do not have to know that Seattle has almost 750k residents, but a good candidate should infer that it is a big city in the US and that can be assumed it has 1M residents. No. of windows per residents: you are actually interested in the number of facades to clean; a small window has 2 facades, the inner one and the external one, while bigger windows have 4 or more facades. Let's assume that an average residence in Seattle has 2 people and 40 window facades. So we have 20 residential facades per inhabitant. Let's assume to have other 20 commercial window facades per resident, including e.g. bars, offices, stores. -> 1M residents x 40 window facades, we have a total of 40M facades to clean. Now let's evaluate the charge per facade. Facades per hour: the time requested for a wide window of a store will be much higher than the service window of a little house. Let's assume an expert cleaner will take 1 min for a medium-sized window, i.e. 60 facades per hour. Charge per hour: let's assume an hourly rate of $10. We should also consider the cost for infrastructures, tools, products, and insurance: let's estimate other $5 per hour. -> in an hour: $15 / 60 facade, that gives 25 cents per window facade. --> Therefore to clean all the windows of Seattle you could charge $10M ($0,25 x 40M). Remember: in consulting nobody knows the number of windows in Seattle and maybe neither in window-cleaning companies :) What will be valued is not the accuracy of this type of numbers, but the reasoning you make behind them and your common sense (you should always wonder if numbers you estimate have sense or not). In addition, when you complete an estimation (e.g. the no. of residents in Seattle) you can ask the interviewer whether you can proceed with that number or she has something more accurate. The solution proposed will be considered great and will allows you to pass the round. But in order to really crack it and impress the interviewer, you should be more curious, proactive and come up with creative considerations, potentially based on personal experience. Some examples: When you calculate the no. of windows in town you can make some comparisons with your city, e.g.: "in Manhattan, I feel lucky with just one window at home, but I know that Seattle is more residential, houses are bigger and they usually have beautiful views on surrounding gardens and parks. Therefore let's assume an average house has 4 little windows (2 facades each), 4 medium (4 facades each) and 2 big (8 facades each)." Think out of the box: ask the interviewer if you should also consider the car windows. When you evaluate the cleaning speed you can say, with a bit of healthy self-irony: "A medium-sized facade take me at least 3-4 minutes to clean it. But I know to be a disaster :) I assume an expert cleaner with professional tools can handle it and move to the next one in 1 minute." In the end, to consider other risks not covered in the discussion, you could also introduce a safety factor, e.g. "the time evaluated do not consider the time to put up and put down the infrastructure and the time needed to wait for residents to free up windows. For these and other possible risks we should consider an increase of 10% of the estimate."
Q&A ansehen
How did you find your dream role and career passion?
38 Min
< 100
2
Profilbild von Soheil
Beste Antwort von
Soheil
Hi there, I can relate a lot to what you’re describing — and honestly, this is a very typical phase after a few years in consulting. You’ve seen a lot, learned a lot… but it starts to feel a bit “all over the place.” A couple of things that might help you think about it more clearly. First, I wouldn’t put too much pressure on the idea of a single “career passion.” In practice, most people don’t find it in one shot. It’s usually more iterative — you notice what you enjoy a bit more, you move in that direction, and it becomes clearer over time. In your case, the retail/consumer interest is already a useful signal. It may not be “the answer,” but it’s definitely not random either. If you consistently enjoy those problems more, that’s worth taking seriously. What I’ve found helpful is to separate the question a bit, instead of trying to solve everything at once. For example: Do you actually want to stay in consulting as a way of working (variety, pace, external perspective)? Or are you more drawn to owning something and seeing it through over time (which usually points more toward in-house roles)? That distinction is often more important than the industry itself. Then on the industry side, you don’t need to be 100% sure. You just need a direction that feels more interesting than the alternatives. Retail seems to be that for you right now. Given that, both paths you mentioned make sense: either try to move closer to consumer/retail within consulting (even if it means switching firms) or move in-house and go deeper in that space There’s no “perfect” choice here — it’s more about what you want to optimize for next. One thing I would strongly recommend is not trying to figure this out only in your head. Talk to people. A few conversations with people in retail strategy roles (both in consulting and in-house) will give you much more clarity than weeks of thinking. Also, don’t worry too much about “locking in” at 35. You’re not choosing your last job — you’re choosing your next step. And it’s completely fine if that step just gets you closer, not all the way. If I simplify it, I’d do this: lean into the retail signal → decide whether you want consulting vs. in-house → test it through conversations / exposure → then make a move. That’s usually how people get out of this “stuck” feeling.   Best, Soheil
Q&A ansehen
Hello All,I did my BCG internship interview in jan and I didn't get in. Now I am preparing for full time and I am in target mba in europe. MBB are coming to the school in september. so my question is when should I start preparing? Will 4 months not be overkill?
2 Std
< 100
6
Profilbild von Franco
Beste Antwort von
Franco
Hi, I don’t think there’s such a  thing as “too much preparation”; there is,  however, such a thing as the wrong type of preparation. So 4months is not overkill if used properly. You have plenty of time between now and September,  so I wouldn’t go full steam immediately. Instead think about building your preparation in a structured and consistent way. If your budget allows, I would strongly recommend starting with one coaching session early on. The goal is to: assess where you stand identify your main gaps define a clear preparation plan From there, consistency matters much more than intensity.  On your concern about sounding robotic, this is usually not due to too much prep, but to the wrong kind of prep; for example,  over-relying on memorized frameworks instead of learning how to lead the case and communicate in a clear, structured way. The goal is not to memorize more cases but to think better during the case. Feel free to DM me if you’d like to go deeper Best, Franco
Q&A ansehen
Masters at Nova
2 Std
< 100
2
Profilbild von Tommaso
Beste Antwort von
Tommaso
Hey Anonymous, First of all: you are not alone, I remember how complicated it seems to face these choices at a very young age. And, from your story, it seems like you have already done a lot and are an incredibly proactive person -- kudos! However, answering to your question is almost impossible: you are comparing two institutions (Nova and UW) that frankly tend to be very similar. Both are very prestigious, they have similar rankings, they probably send a good number of students to MBB every year. Even Marketing and Management are not that different! The reality is that many other things in your life will co-determine what kind of job you will get. Getting a specific job is not a deterministic process where you can confidently say "I need to go to Uni X vs. Uni Y, because I will get a 30-50% higher change of working for McKinsey". There are too many factors (your internship, your interests, the specific needs of the office, the economic cycle, etc.) to control for. A Management program might be more aligned, but also more people will apply to MBB and so you might be less likely to stand out. The only good advice that I can give you is making a choice that you think will make you generally happier. Here, *generally* means in the average outcome, and not only in the xx% outcome where you land an MBB job straight out of undergrad.   If you want to do more Strategy than Marketing/Analytics in your life, then switching might make sense if that's driven by genuine passion, maybe less so if driven by an unproven y% in improvement in your job prospects. And are you sure that your current degree gives you statistically significant lower chances of getting the work you need? When I was facing a similar choice, what helped me a ton was speaking with alumni. I was worried that my "favorite" MSc. program could have limited career opportunities, but speaking with five Alums showed me my assumption was totally baseless :) Good luck on your endeavors! Tom PS: Fwiw, keep in mind that my colleagues at McKinsey had every kind of degree: Management or Finance for sure, but also Marketing, Humanities, Design, Engineering, Biotech, etc. Also, many of them joined McKinsey much later in their life, so any choice you make you'll have more than a few opportunities to do strategy consulting.
Q&A ansehen
Dual Degree Value for Recruitment
2 Std
< 100
4
Profilbild von Soheil
Beste Antwort von
Soheil
Hi there, I like that you are thinking about this early — but I’d be careful not to overestimate how much a dual degree by itself moves the needle in recruiting. Having business + engineering is definitely a strong combo. It signals you’re quantitative and also understand the commercial side. That’s attractive for consulting, tech, product roles, etc. So yes, all else equal, it can make your profile a bit more interesting. But in reality, recruiters don’t sit there and say: “this person has two degrees, so hire.” They care much more about things like: what you actually did (internships, projects) how you think and communicate whether you’ve shown leadership or impact I’ve seen candidates with “perfect” academic profiles (including dual degrees) who struggled, and others with simpler backgrounds who did very well because their experience and story were stronger. Where the dual degree does help is if you use it well. If it just sits on your CV as: “BBA + Engineering”, it doesn’t add much. But if you can say: “I’ve worked on problems at the intersection of tech and business — for example…” then it becomes much more powerful. That’s when it actually differentiates you. Also worth thinking about the trade-off. A dual degree takes time and energy. If it comes at the expense of internships, networking, or leadership experience, it might not be the best trade. So the way I’d think about it is: do it if you’re genuinely interested in that mix and want to build a profile around it — not just because you think it will boost recruiting chances. If I had to summarize it simply: it’s a nice plus, but it won’t replace strong experience and a clear story. Best, Soheil  
Q&A ansehen
Initial LEK Online Assessment
2 Std
< 100
2
Profilbild von Tommaso
Beste Antwort von
Tommaso
Hey, The test is pretty common, almost standard. From what I’ve heard (late 2025), it is heavier on data questions (e.g., graphs, thinking in terms of growth or margin percentages) than most consulting tests. I would ensure you know how to read the most common graph types and answer questions where you have to quickly calculate data based on them. You might also expect some multiple-choice "situational questions" (e.g., "In your team, you have one person behaving in way X and another in way Y; you notice some tension. How would you manage this?"). Just FYI: these tests change fairly often, as Recruiting teams are continuously A/B testing what works best and rotate questions or types every 1-2 years once they realize people have become too familiar with them. Good luck! Tom
Q&A ansehen
People In KEARNEY
2 Std
< 100
2
Profilbild von Tommaso
Beste Antwort von
Tommaso
Hey, At least for the post-MBA role, the average wait time in the US for Kearney from my friends was 1-2 weeks (with the median probably closer to one week), so I expect something similar for the junior roles. However, keep in mind that the last few weeks have been weird; firms might still be trying to assess the impact of the new geopolitical happenings on staffing needs. In any case, I would write back after 15-20 days if you have not heard anything :) Best, Tom
Q&A ansehen
Clinical to Healthcare Consulting - Networking Advice
3 Std
< 100
3
Profilbild von Tommaso
Beste Antwort von
Tommaso
Hi Emily, Your approach is correct. I think you are just facing a specific issue: MBB wants to hire profiles like you because they are definitely expanding into healthcare (traditionally, not a top-5 industry in terms of revenues for most firms in Europe) and need deeper expertise, but many firms just don't have a structured process for you to meet them. I would do a few things: Try to get a foot in the door through every event that is remotely connected to you (e.g., experienced hire, women in leadership) and tell the Recruiter you'd want a "coffee chat" with them or with a consultant to understand how/if their firm hires folks healthcare experts like you Broaden the scope of potential connections: I think any healthcare consultant (Manager and above) works is a good fit for a first chat! If you have NHS experience, try to look into Public Sector / Public Policy positions. McKinsey for example has a dedicated practice called SHaPE (https://www.mckinsey.com/mckinseys-work-for-social-healthcare-and-public-entities) that often has dedicated Recruiters and pipelines to find more experienced candidates LinkedIn is the right channel, but don’t be discouraged by a low response rate -- the standard is typically a 10-15% success rate. And try to A/B test different message formats (e.g., long vs. short, focus on the work they do vs. their career trajectory). Hope this helps! Tom
Q&A ansehen

Hier geht's weiter mit den nächsten Artikeln:

Market Sizing
Case-Typen
Fragen zur Marktgröße werden häufig in Case-Interviews im Consulting gestellt, weil sie eine Mischung aus Logik, Mathematik und gesundem Menschenverstand erfordern. Sie können als eigenständige Frage oder als Teil eines größeren Cases gestellt werden. Bewerber:innen, die sich mit Fragen zur Marktgröße auskennen, können hier richtig punkten.
Zum Artikel
Markteintritt
Case-Typen
Der Markteintritt ist eines der wichtigsten Themen in der Beratungsbranche und stellt Berater:innen und Unternehmen vor große Herausforderungen und Chancen. Diese Cases erfordern eine gründliche Analyse und strategische Planung, um neue Märkte erfolgreich zu erschließen.
Zum Artikel
Brainteaser
Case-Typen
Brainteaser sind Aufgaben, die sich auf ein einziges Problem konzentrieren, anstatt komplexe Business-Cases abzubilden. Sie erfordern kreatives Denken, Logik oder mathematische Fähigkeiten und können in Form von Rätseln, Textaufgaben oder visuellen Puzzles auftreten. Diese Aufgaben sind darauf ausgelegt, deine Problemlösungsfähigkeiten, dein analytisches Denken und deine Fähigkeit, unter Druck ruhig zu bleiben, zu testen.Typische Probleme beziehen sich auf alltägliche Themen und können sogar unrealistische Annahmen beinhalten. Alle notwendigen Informationen sind in der Frage enthalten, sodass keine weiteren Annahmen notwendig sind. Dieser Artikel erklärt im Detail, warum Brainteaser in der Vorbereitung auf Case-Interviews nützlich sind und wie man sie löst.
Zum Artikel