Wenn du dich auf ein Case-Interview vorbereitest, insbesondere unter Zeitdruck, kann die Zusammenarbeit mit einem erfahrenen Coach deine Erfolgschancen erheblich steigern.
💡 Pro Tipp: Auf PrepLounge hast du Zugang zu über 800 (ehemaligen) Berater:innen von führenden Unternehmen wie McKinsey, BCG und Bain, die dir helfen, deine Interviewtechnik zu perfektionieren.
Was sind die Hauptvorteile des Übens mit einem Coach?
Personalisiertes Feedback
Einer der Hauptvorteile der Zusammenarbeit mit einem Coach ist das Erhalten von maßgeschneidertem Feedback. Im Gegensatz zu allgemeinen Vorbereitungsmethoden kann ein Coach deine spezifischen Schwächen erkennen und dir gezielte Ratschläge geben, um dich zu verbessern. Dieser persönliche Ansatz stellt sicher, dass deine Vorbereitung effizient und zielgerichtet ist und deine individuellen Bedürfnisse berücksichtigt.
Realistische Simulation
Das Üben mit einem Coach ermöglicht es dir, eine realistische Interviewsituation zu erleben. Coaches, die zahlreiche Case Interviews durchgeführt haben, können den Druck und die Dynamik eines echten Interviews simulieren, wodurch du dich wohler und sicherer fühlst. Diese Erfahrung ist unbezahlbar, da sie dich darauf vorbereitet, den Stress und die Spontanität echter Interviews zu bewältigen.
Insiderwissen
Alle Coaches auf PrepLounge kommen selbst aus renommierten Beratungsunternehmen. Ihr Insiderwissen darüber, wonach Top-Unternehmen suchen, kann dir einen erheblichen Vorteil verschaffen. Sie können dir Einblicke in den Interviewprozess, häufige Fallstricke und die spezifischen Eigenschaften, die Unternehmen schätzen, geben, sodass du gut vorbereitet bist, diese Erwartungen zu erfüllen.
Strukturierter Ansatz
Ein Coach kann dir helfen, einen strukturierten Ansatz zur Lösung von Case-Problemen zu entwickeln. Diese strukturierte Denkweise ist in Case Interviews entscheidend, wo klare, logische und gut organisierte Antworten hoch geschätzt werden. Coaches können dir Frameworks und Methoden beibringen, die deinen Problemlösungsprozess vereinfachen und deine Antworten kohärenter und überzeugender machen.
Zeiteffizienz
Für Kandidat:innen mit begrenzter Vorbereitungszeit ist Coaching eine äußerst effiziente Methode, um sich vorzubereiten. Coaches können schnell Bereiche identifizieren, die verbessert werden müssen, und dir helfen, deine Anstrengungen auf die am meisten benötigten Bereiche zu konzentrieren. Diese gezielte Vorbereitung kann dir Zeit sparen und dir helfen, schneller voranzukommen, als du es alleine tun würdest.
Selbstvertrauen steigern
Selbstvertrauen spielt eine entscheidende Rolle bei der Interviewleistung. Regelmäßiges Training mit einem Coach kann dein Selbstvertrauen stärken, indem es dich mit dem Interviewformat vertraut macht und dir hilft, deine Antworten zu verfeinern. Zu wissen, dass du dich gründlich mit fachkundiger Anleitung vorbereitet hast, kann die Angst erheblich reduzieren und deine Gesamtleistung verbessern.
Wie dich PrepLounge mit vielfältigen Coaching-Optionen optimal unterstützt
🚀 Flexibilität und genau das, was zu dir passt
PrepLounge bietet verschiedene Coaching-Optionen, die zu deinen Bedürfnissen und Vorlieben passen. Du kannst aus Einzelsessions, CV Reviews oder umfassenden Coaching-Paketen wählen, die mehrere Sitzungen umfassen oder sich auf bestimmte Themen konzentrieren. Darüber hinaus gibt es Programme, die eine Premium-Mitgliedschaft mit Coaching-Credits und weiteren Coachingelementen wie Workshops oder Gruppencoachings kombinieren und eine kostengünstige Möglichkeit bieten, erstklassige Coaching-Dienste in Anspruch zu nehmen.
📅 Workshops und Online-Events
PrepLounge veranstaltet auch regelmäßig Workshops und Online-Events, die von erfahrenen Coaches geleitet werden. Diese Sitzungen decken eine Vielzahl von Themen ab und bieten Möglichkeiten für interaktives Lernen und direktes Feedback. Die Teilnahme an diesen Events kann deine Vorbereitung weiter verbessern und dich über die neuesten Trends und Techniken in Case Interviews auf dem Laufenden halten.
Wie du den perfekten Coach findest, der zu deinen Bedürfnissen passt
Um den perfekten Coach für deine Case-Interview Vorbereitung zu finden, kannst du in drei Schritten vorgehen:
Filtern: Filtere die Coaches in der Coach-Übersicht nach deinen wichtigsten Kriterien, wie Preis pro Coaching-Sitzung oder beruflichem Hintergrund.
Auswahl eingrenzen: Wähle bis zu 10 Coaches aus, deren Profile, Bewertungen, Q&A-Beiträge und PrepLounge-Awards du näher erkunden möchtest.
Kontaktieren: Kontaktiere 2-3 Coaches, um potenzielle Fragen oder Bedenken zu klären. Frage ruhig, ob sie ein kostenloses Einführungsgespräch anbieten.
Was macht einen guten Coach aus?
Gute Coaches zeichnen sich durch folgende Merkmale aus:
Individuelle Anpassung: Sie passen das Coaching an deine spezifischen Bedürfnisse an.
Gute Beziehung: Sie sorgen dafür, dass du dich wohlfühlst und gut mit ihnen zusammenarbeiten kannst.
Transparenz: Sie bieten dir volle Transparenz über den Coaching-Prozess auf PrepLounge.
Abschließende Überlegungen zur Zusammenarbeit mit einem Coach:
Das Lernen mit einem Coach ist eine strategische Investition in deine Case-Interview-Vorbereitung. Das individuelle Feedback, die realistische Simulation, das Insiderwissen und der Vertrauensschub, den Coaches bieten, können einen erheblichen Unterschied in deiner Leistung ausmachen. Mit der fachkundigen Anleitung, die auf PrepLounge verfügbar ist, kannst du sicherstellen, dass du gründlich vorbereitet und bereit bist, in deinen Case-Interviews zu glänzen.
Durch die Nutzung der Expertise erfahrener Coaches, die Auswahl des perfekten Coaches und die Inanspruchnahme der vielfältigen Coaching-Optionen und Events auf PrepLounge kannst du deine Vorbereitungseffizienz maximieren, dein Selbstvertrauen stärken und deine Chancen erhöhen, eine Position bei einemTop-Beratungsunternehmen zu sichern.
Finde interessante Einblicke von Coaches im Consulting Q&A
where can i find more BCG platinion cases? i've done the two here and using AI to give me more but its not as accurate
14 Min
< 100
4
Beste Antwort von
Alessa
hello! BCG Platinion cases are honestly a bit harder to find because they’re much more tech focused and less standardized than classic strategy cases from my point of view. I’d recommend three things. Maybe filter specifically on Prep for IT or digital implementation style cases rather than pure strategy? Second, look at BCG X and digital cases as well since the logic and depth are often very similar to Platinion interviews. Third, practice tech heavy cases from firms like Accenture Strategy or Deloitte Digital because the structure and discussion around architecture, legacy systems, and implementation trade offs is very close. If you want something closer to the real format, focus less on generic AI generated cases and more on adapting real project examples into cases yourself, for example core banking migration, ERP implementation, cloud strategy, data platform build. That will feel much more realistic than generic market entry prompts. best,Alessa :)
Recently had an interview for PWC CDD (associate), wanted to get your perspective on my case approach and areas of improvement. I summarized the key parts of my response below for your quick review for manager round where I already cleared director round before due to HR error
15 Min
< 100
3
Beste Antwort von
Soheil
Hi there, First of all — clearing the director round and getting positive feedback on structure is a strong signal. You’re clearly doing many things right. That said, for a CDD case (especially PE-focused), the bar for depth and decision-orientation is higher. Let me break this down directly around your questions. --------------------------------- 1) Is your overall structure appropriate? Your structure is solid for a general strategy case. However, for a PE CDD, I would expect a sharper angle around three dimensions: A. The PE lens (missing explicitly) You didn’t fully structure around: Expected ROI / IRR Entry valuation vs exit multiple Value creation levers Synergies with existing portfolio companies Key risks (operational, managerial, scalability) In CDD, the core question is not just: “Is this a good business?” It’s: “Is this a good investment at this price, within this holding period?” That distinction is critical. B. Target company assessment (could be deeper) You touched on unit economics, but stronger depth would include: Historical revenue growth vs projected ramp-up Store-level EBITDA and payback period Fixed vs variable cost breakdown Competitive advantages (brand, sourcing, locations, loyalty programs) Management capability to execute rapid expansion CDD interviews reward specificity over conceptual discussion. C. Target market (generally well covered) Your TAM logic was reasonable and structured. What would make it stronger: What share is required to hit ₹1,250 Cr? Is that share realistic given competitive intensity? That quant bridge is where many candidates stop too early. --------------------------------- 2) Where does your analysis fall short? Mainly in three areas: 1. Quantification You identified drivers (price vs volume, capacity constraints), but: How many stores are needed to reach ₹1,250 Cr? Revenue per store required? Can seating turnover realistically support it? What capex would that imply? CDD managers look for financial back-of-the-envelope pressure testing. 2. Risk framing Premium positioning risk is good — but expand it: Managerial bandwidth risk (rapid scaling) Location saturation risk Cost inflation risk (rent, wages) Competitive retaliation Execution risk in semi-urban expansion A strong answer explicitly prioritizes risks. 3. Decision orientation Your conclusion was conceptually correct, but slightly neutral. A stronger close sounds like: “At current scale, the growth plan requires X% CAGR and Y new stores annually. This seems feasible only if unit economics remain stable and premium positioning is protected. I would recommend investment conditional on validating store-level profitability and scalability assumptions.” CDD is about conditional recommendations, not conceptual summaries. --------------------------------- 3) How to be more decision-oriented? At every stage, ask: What does this imply for investment attractiveness? Does this support or weaken the thesis? What would make me say no? Force yourself to translate insights into “so what?” --------------------------------- 4) What differentiates “good” vs “strong”? Good candidate: Clear structure Logical TAM Identifies bottlenecks Talks about unit economics Strong candidate (manager-ready): Frames explicitly around PE returns Quantifies scaling feasibility Links TAM to required market share Identifies and prioritizes risks Gives a conditional investment recommendation Thinks in terms of IRR, exit multiple, and value creation plan --------------------------------- Final thought Your foundation is strong. The next level is: Sharper PE framing More financial pressure-testing More explicit “investment lens” throughout That’s usually what interviewers mean when they say “good structure, go deeper.” If you’d like, happy to walk through how I would structure this case specifically for a CDD context 🙂
After going through the details of the case, how can I start the case? Every time when I see a case interview question with a solution, I am quite comfortable in understanding the solution. However, I haven't been able to take the initial step on my own.
17 Std
100+
8
Beste Antwort von
Alessandro
The thing is you are probably trying to solve the case, which is not what you are going to be evaluated on. Structure and logical approach allow you to find an answer, and that is what consultants should do. Having an answer before structuring often means the answer is wrong an or you think too highly of yourself - both no gos. Step 1: Repeat back what you heard Paraphrase the prompt in one sentence. Shows you listened. Buys you time to think. Step 2: Confirm the goal Ask: "So we're trying to decide whether to [do X], correct?" or "The objective is to [increase profit/enter market/etc], right?" Lock in what success looks like. Step 3: Ask 2-3 clarifying questions Not random questions. Ask what changes your approach: Geography or market scope Time horizon Constraints (budget, capacity, risk tolerance) Product/customer specifics if vague Step 4: Take 30-60 seconds to structure objective, buckets, subbuckets Step 5: Present your structure Walk them through it in 30 seconds: "To figure out if [client should do X], I want to look at three areas: [A, B, C]. Within A, I'll examine. Within B,. I'd start with A because [reason]. Does that sound reasonable?" You just need a logical map.
What types of case frameworks, data interpretation approaches, or practice resources would best prepare me for operational, implementation‑focused consulting
20 Std
< 100
5
Beste Antwort von
Alessandro
Drop strategy-first frameworks like Porter's Five Forces or market entry. This firm wants delivery-side thinking. you could use Process flow decomposition - map the product development lifecycle step by step, find where delays, rework, or quality issues happen Root cause analysis (5 Whys / fishbone) - trace a symptom (e.g. bad data, missed deadlines) back to its real cause across people, process, tools, and data Input-process-output (IPO) - ask: what goes in, what happens to it, and what comes out? Useful for diagnosing any engineering or product workflow always MECE issue trees - structure problems around four buckets: speed, quality, cost, capability The test is about reading messy information and telling a story from it, not calculating. Focus on: Spot what is wrong and why it matters - is the data incomplete? Inconsistent? Out of date? Then link it to a real business consequence Lead with the insight, not the observation - say "the handoff between teams is causing rework" before you say "I noticed the error rate rises at stage 3" Contribution style matters as much as content: Suggest a shared structure before the group dives in Signal when you are building on someone or challenging an assumption If the group gets stuck, step in to summarise and reframe - that is process leadership, and assessors value it
It's great you've landed that CRA interview – transitioning from research is a path many take, and firms like CRA truly value that deep scientific expertise. For your first round, especially coming from a research background, they're not necessarily expecting you to be a case interview master right out of the gate. What they are looking for is your ability to structure ambiguous problems, think logically under pressure, and apply your scientific intuition to business challenges. While general guides like Case in Point are solid for understanding core frameworks, your critical next step is finding life science-specific cases. Focus on common industry scenarios: market sizing for a new therapeutic, competitive landscape analysis, R&D portfolio prioritization, or commercial strategy for a medical device. Practice articulating your thought process clearly, translating complex scientific concepts into actionable business insights. The best way to get up to speed quickly is to practice cases out loud with others. Look for practice partners who understand the life sciences context – often you can find them through university career centers, LinkedIn groups, or even former colleagues who've made similar transitions. Their feedback on how you frame problems and communicate your solutions will be invaluable. Good luck with the prep and the interview!
BCG ASPIRE 2026 – Assessment Invite but CV Wasn’t Uploaded
22 Std
< 100
4
Beste Antwort von
Cristian
Hard to tell. It sounds like the invite was sent to all the applicants automatically. If you haven't already done so, follow-up with the recruiter for a second time. I'm sure that once they become aware of it, they'll want you to correct/complete the application, so it's just a logistical thing to clarify (though I can imagine it's stressful). Hope you hear good news from them!Best,Cristian
Yep, say yes. And yep, shoot for Consultant level. Bain reaching out a year later is genuinely rare. Firms get thousands of applications and recruiters don't set calendar reminders for candidates they forgot about. You left a real impression. Accept the compliment, then prepare harder than last time. On the level question: 4.5 years of experience puts you squarely in Consultant territory. Going back as an Associate would be underselling yourself. U also got a year of extra polish since the first round, which you should weaponize in your narrative. One honest flag: Proactive outreach sometimes signals a specific role or timeline need. Worth asking the recruiter directly what level and practice they have in mind before you anchor yourself. Practical moves: Confirm the level with the recruiter and frame it around your updated experience Re-prep cases from scratch. A near-miss last year doesn't mean you're close enough now Turn "a year of growth" into a concrete story, not just elapsed time. What did you actually build, lead, or deliver? As for the "not many applicants" theory, possible, but the boring explanation is someone on the team remembered you and flagged it. That's the signal worth focusing on. if you need help to ensure this time you meet the bar - happy to jump on an intro call
Best preparation strategy & resources for MBB interviews Italy - looking for real experiences
1 Tag
< 100
7
Beste Antwort von
Alessandro
Ciao Susanna, Your profile is stronger than most people who apply to MBB Italy. Engineering-to-management, top grades, Big Four consulting experience. The hard part isn't getting noticed, it's converting that into an offer. Get the foundation right before anything else Before you dive into volume, get a coach or experienced mentor to set the foundation with you. A few sessions early on will save you weeks of practicing bad habits. Unlearning is harder than learning. This applies to both cases and PEI, don't treat them separately. PEI deserves as much preparation as the case Most people treat fit prep as an afterthought. It isn't. McKinsey's PEI is a structured deep-dive where a single story gets drilled for 10+ minutes. You need 3-4 experiences that are genuinely rich, with real complexity, real stakes, and a clear personal role. If the story is thin, they'll find out fast. Start building these in parallel with cases from day one. On cases: learn to think, not to recognize patterns The goal of doing many cases isn't pattern recognition, it's building the muscle of structuring under pressure. The candidates who fail aren't the ones who got the math wrong. They're the ones who froze, went circular, or couldn't hold a clear thread. Do a lot of cases, but with real intention behind each one. Communication beats correct answers Interviewers aren't grading your spreadsheet. They're asking: can I put this person in front of a client? Lead with your conclusion, structure your reasoning out loud, flag your assumptions early. A clear, confident wrong answer lands better than a correct one buried in hesitation. Build a practice system, not just a practice habit Mix expert coaching with peer mocks. Peers are great for volume and live pressure, but they make the same mistakes you do. Without expert feedback, small errors compound and nobody catches them. Set recurring check-ins with a coach throughout prep, not just at the start. It's easy to drift and convince yourself you're better than you are. Do math drills everywhere, commuting, in the shower, before bed. Fumbling a simple calculation mid-case kills your flow even if you recover. Use your background as a differentiator Aerospace engineering stands out, especially for infrastructure and energy work, where all three firms are active in Italy. But translate it. Not "I worked on TPRM." Instead: "I helped clients reduce exposure across complex vendor ecosystems and made risk recommendations with incomplete data."
Advanced-degree candidate: timing, geography, and internship
1 Tag
< 100
3
Beste Antwort von
Kevin
These are all really thoughtful questions, especially as you navigate the unique Advanced Degree recruiting timeline from Singapore. It's a slightly different machine, but with some clear principles. On timing, being 'between roles' isn't ideal, but it's often an expected part of the transition for ADs. Firms understand you're leaving academia. What's more important than the gap itself is how you frame it and what you're doing during that time. If you're actively interviewing, networking, or upskilling, it's generally fine for a few months. The key is to demonstrate sustained drive, not just a holding pattern. Regarding geography, Singapore and other Asia/ME offices are highly competitive, just perhaps in different ways than, say, the US or UK. They often have smaller AD cohorts, meaning fewer spots, but also a specific local market fit they're looking for. Applying broadly can improve your odds simply by increasing the total number of applications, but each office is a distinct entity with its own headcount and cultural needs. You'll need to tailor your story for each region. Finally, a 6-month internship at a small boutique after your postdoc will likely still see you evaluated as an AD, but one with some nascent business experience. It generally won't put you into the experienced hire pipeline. This can help if you can genuinely articulate how it enhances your business acumen, client-facing skills, or industry knowledge relevant to consulting. However, if it appears simply as a placeholder without a strong narrative, it might not move the needle much. The most crucial thing is to leverage that time to build your story for why consulting, and why now. Hope this helps you strategize!
Fragen zur Marktgröße werden häufig in Case-Interviews im Consulting gestellt, weil sie eine Mischung aus Logik, Mathematik und gesundem Menschenverstand erfordern. Sie können als eigenständige Frage oder als Teil eines größeren Cases gestellt werden. Bewerber:innen, die sich mit Fragen zur Marktgröße auskennen, können hier richtig punkten.
Der Markteintritt ist eines der wichtigsten Themen in der Beratungsbranche und stellt Berater:innen und Unternehmen vor große Herausforderungen und Chancen. Diese Cases erfordern eine gründliche Analyse und strategische Planung, um neue Märkte erfolgreich zu erschließen.
Brainteaser sind Aufgaben, die sich auf ein einziges Problem konzentrieren, anstatt komplexe Business-Cases abzubilden. Sie erfordern kreatives Denken, Logik oder mathematische Fähigkeiten und können in Form von Rätseln, Textaufgaben oder visuellen Puzzles auftreten. Diese Aufgaben sind darauf ausgelegt, deine Problemlösungsfähigkeiten, dein analytisches Denken und deine Fähigkeit, unter Druck ruhig zu bleiben, zu testen.Typische Probleme beziehen sich auf alltägliche Themen und können sogar unrealistische Annahmen beinhalten. Alle notwendigen Informationen sind in der Frage enthalten, sodass keine weiteren Annahmen notwendig sind. Dieser Artikel erklärt im Detail, warum Brainteaser in der Vorbereitung auf Case-Interviews nützlich sind und wie man sie löst.