Melde Dich an und erhalte kostenlosen Zugriff auf über 50 Artikel.
Jetzt kostenlos registrieren >>

BootCamp-Artikel

Gelesene Artikel: 0/52

Focus on the core: practicing mock interviews with peers

Take on both interviewee and interviewer roles

Though it is crucial to get as much practice solving cases (as an interviewee), it is also helpful to play the role of an interviewer. Aside from it being fair to “give and take” cases, as an interviewer you get a different angle. For instance, you will see potential mistakes or best practices first-hand – both of which you can learn from.

If you are new to mock interviews with peers, here are a couple of guidelines to help you get started as an interviewer:

  • In general you should:
    • Read and solve the case for yourself before giving it
    • Note that there may be different solutions to the case
    • Feel free to help your practice partners if they are stuck
  • Look out for the following during the case:
    • Are they asking good questions?
    • Are they laying out a logical structure?
    • Are they quantifying their approach?
    • Are they able to synthesize the case?
    • Are they confident, professional, and/or pleasant?

Stages of mock interview practice

Like with any skill, getting proficient at solving cases involves different stages, through which one progresses – usually from incompetence to competence. We have identified 3 main stages based on the testimonials of successful candidates:

  1. Onboarding (<10 cases, conscious incompetence): Candidates overcome the “inertia” to start practicing by getting a feel for live case interviews. Also, in this stage candidates recognize their deficits and the need for regular practice.
  2. Ramp-up (10-30 cases, conscious competence): Candidates start forming good habits of practicing regularly. In this stage candidates know how to go about solving the case but require a lot of concentration.
  3. Internalization (>30 cases, unconscious competence): Candidates are starting to structure cases with customized frameworks (e.g. issue tree) and have time to build rapport with the interviewer. In this final stage, candidates can almost solve the case effortlessly and therefore go beyond the case.

It’s important to bear in mind that there is no magic number of cases that one has to reach. This depends from candidate to candidate and can range anywhere from 30 to 100. It’s better to focus on the progression through the stages and to keep pushing, until the skills are internalized. Quitting before this stage or getting stuck in the previous stage tends to be the difference between almost getting the offer and actually getting the offer.

3 Kommentar(e)
3. April 2019 22:28 -
Popo

Let start!

30. März 2017 11:06 -
David

I have an interview in two weeks, hope to be ready by then

14. Januar 2017 23:52 -
Imran

Agree with the above assessment. After 30 or so cases you do start "internalizing" your personalized approach to a case or any case really!

Verwandte Consulting-Fragen
What's the best way to structure a revenue growth case?
Vlad gab die beste Antwort am 16. Feb 2018 - 6 Antworten
McKinsey / Accenture / Got all BIG3 offers / More than 300 real MBB cases / Harvard Business School
Coaching mit Vlad vereinbaren

97% Empfehlungsrate

340 Meetings

4.316 Q&A Upvotes

319 USD / Coaching

Hi! It depends very much on the industry. In some cases (Growth strategy) I will use a broad structure, in others (e.g. “how to increase the excessive luggage revenues for an Airline”) I will use P... (mehr)

Business situation framework
Francesco bearbeitete die beste Antwort am 27. Mär 2018 - 1 Antwort
#1 Expert for Coaching Sessions (2.100+) | 1.000+ Reviews with 100% Recommendation Rate | Ex BCG | 6 Years Coaching Experience
Coaching mit Francesco vereinbaren

100% Empfehlungsrate

2.173 Meetings

2.281 Q&A Upvotes

319 USD / Coaching

Hi Elisey, I would personally not recommend to use a single framework for all the so-called business situations (M&A, Entry, New product, Operations etc). Although this would help to more easil... (mehr)

What are the most appropriate frameworks for pricing cases?
Vlad gab die beste Antwort am 21. Jul 2017 - 1 Antwort
McKinsey / Accenture / Got all BIG3 offers / More than 300 real MBB cases / Harvard Business School
Coaching mit Vlad vereinbaren

97% Empfehlungsrate

340 Meetings

4.316 Q&A Upvotes

319 USD / Coaching

Hi, The general framework for pricing is: Cost base - Value based - Competitor based - pricing strategy 1. Cost based - you actually check what are the costs and apply standard industry / target... (mehr)

Robust, MECE but simple M&A Framework
Peter
Experte
gab die beste Antwort am 19. Jan 2017 - 2 Antworten
Ex-Bain & Company Case Team Leader * Placed 40+ MBB candidates as Partner in Europe's leading top-tier Consulting recruiting firm
Coaching mit Peter vereinbaren

100% Empfehlungsrate

14 Meetings

73 Q&A Upvotes

319 USD / Coaching

You never want to use a pre-thought out framework in a case, so I would throw out any notions of having anything ready. What you'll find is the case will be laid out in a way which means that you don'... (mehr)

In an issue tree for profitability framework, where do you factor in questions about market etc.?
Sidi gab die beste Antwort am 13. Aug 2018 - 1 Antwort
McKinsey Engagement Manager & BCG Consultant | Interviewer at McK & BCG for 7 years | Coached 80+ candidates secure MBB offers
Coaching mit Sidi vereinbaren

100% Empfehlungsrate

274 Meetings

1.654 Q&A Upvotes

319 USD / Coaching

Hi Kay, this is indeed one of the fundamental things that you need to learn in order to rigorously disaggregate the value drivers of a business. The driver tree allows you to identify the numerical d... (mehr)