Werde aktiv in unserer Community aus über 452.000 Gleichgesinnten!

Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Case-Partner, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!

How to avoid *Too-Generic* Feedback?

caseinterview
Neue Antwort am 18. Aug. 2023
5 Antworten
291 Views
Anonym A fragte am 11. Aug. 2023

Hi, 

I'm in the middle of my case prep. I'm an MBA student so I used most of the school club resources and alumni support group to prep for casing. While initially, I was struggling to understand the concepts, gladly with practice I have got a hold of the casing. 

The only feedback, I have been receiving lately is “You are doing great in problem-solving and casing, but it seemed too general. You are developing bad habits of generalization”. 

How can I work on this? Also, any tips on what would be helpful to up my game in casings considering I have done almost 27 cases?

Übersicht der Antworten

Upvotes
  • Upvotes
  • Datum aufsteigend
  • Datum absteigend
Beste Antwort
Ian
Experte
Content Creator
bearbeitete eine Antwort am 12. Aug. 2023
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate

Hi there,

It sounds like you need to learn how to truly framework!

It sounds like you have memorized a bunch of canned frameworks from casebooks but you have not learned how to solve any question/problem in an objective-driven structured way.

Learn the how and why of frameworking rather than trying to memorize answers.

This is tough and I genuinely recommend coaching to help!

Look at this case to see 5 different framework options that are genuine, tailored, and not generic. This is what you're aiming for!

https://www.preplounge.com/en/management-consulting-cases/candidate-led-usual-style/intermediate/bainbcg-hunger-warriors-270

==========================

#1 most important thing is to be objective-driven. Not hypothesis-driven, but objective driven. Remember that there are 2 objectives: 1) the objective of the case (what is the question I'm trying to solve) and 2) The objective of the client (what are their needs, wants, desires. What does "good" look like)

Furthermore, If there's anything to remember in this process, is that cases don't exist just because. They have come about because of a real need to simulate the world you will be in when you are hopefully hired. As such, remember that they are a simplified version of what we do, and they test you in those areas.

As such, remember that a framework is a guide, not a mandate. In the real-world, we do not go into a client and say "right, we have a framework that says we need to look at x, y, and z and that's exactly what we're going to do". Rather, we come in with a view, a hypothesis, a plan of attack. The moment this view is created, it's wrong! Same with your framework. The point is that it gives us and you a starting point. We can say "right, part 1 of framework is around this. Let's dig around and see if it helps us get to the answer". If it does, great, we go further (but specific elements of it will certainly be wrong). If it doesn't, we move on.

So, you should absolutely be prepared to either enter a new piece of your framework or change your framework altogether as new information comes in. How do you handle this?

Well, first, you can really just articulate what you're doing. You can say "Oh, interesting, so if looks like we have some information on y. I don't want to forget about x, but let's see what y brings us first. Ok, looks like it's about..." Then, when you've "finished" with y, you can check to see if there's any info on x. If there isn't, move to z :)

Second, you can re-summarize/iterate where you are. This is especially useful if you have the change the entire framework. Say "Ok, so it looks like now we actually need to look a 3 key things to solve this"

So, in summary, learn your frameworks, use the ones you like, add/remove to them if the specific case calls for it, and always be prepared to be wrong. Focus rather on having a view, refering back to the initial view to see what is still there and where you need to dive into next to solve the problem.

(editiert)

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Sophia
Experte
antwortete am 13. Aug. 2023
Top-Ranked Coach on PrepLounge for 3 years| 6+ years of coaching

Hello,

I would recommend doing some drills that focus on frameworks and qualitative questions to overcome this. It’s hard to give blanket advice here because I can’t see how exactly how you’re generalizing, but often this issue comes across as either (1) not making frameworks/qualitative answers specific enough to the case prompt you are given, and (2) not delving down to a sufficient level of detail (e.g., only doing top-level buckets). 

My first question is, do you understand why you are getting the feedback / where you are generalizing? If you feel like you don’t, it’s worth checking in with the case partners who gave you that advice to see if they can explain or give you some examples. Alternatively, check out some videos online of what a solid case interview looks like, and see if you can spot the differences between their frameworks and what you are doing.

Once you understand what the error is, get practicing! I’d recommend taking some cases, and spending more time than you would allow yourself in the interview to fully develop a detailed framework and answer at each point. Once you have written out a more detailed, non-general framework, practice presenting that answer to the interviewer. Look up the case solution if there is one, see what parts you have missed. Practicing slowly yet methodically like this will help you drill this sort of thinking into a habit, such that it should eventually become quicker and more intuitive for you.

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Francesco
Experte
Content Creator
antwortete am 11. Aug. 2023
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success (➡ interviewoffers.com) | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching

Hi there,

1) You are doing great in problem-solving and casing, but it seemed too general. You are developing bad habits of generalization”. How can I work on this? 

First of all, I would ask the person who provided the feedback, as this comment is, well, general as well! If that’s not possible I would recommend posting your approach in a different Q&A to get feedback.

2) Also, any tips on what would be helpful to up my game in casings considering I have done almost 27 cases?

After that number of cases, if you used a tracking sheet for mistakes you probably have enough data points to know where you are weak and can start to do drills there (eg, graphs or maths). If you are not using something to track cases, I would highly recommend you start with that as otherwise you won’t know what to improve.

In terms of general tips, you can find some information below:

▶ How to Prepare for a Consulting Interview

Good luck!

Francesco

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Benjamin
Experte
Content Creator
antwortete am 12. Aug. 2023
Ex-BCG Principal | 8+ years consulting experience in SEA | BCG top interviewer & top performer

Hi,

Could you share a specific example of this feedback, or the context in which it was given? 

One possible issue you could be facing is that you are making too many assumptions without validating those and/or not able to take into the account the specific context of the problem and its nuances. 

  • Try to ask yourself → “will this really hold true in all circumstances/instances?” or “what do i know about this client/problem that changes this logic/reasoning/assumption?”

This though means that your core problem solving skills are not robust as well. But without understanding what your caser means by ‘general’ or ‘generalization’ its hard to give better suggestions and tips.

Lastly, remember that quality is more important than quantity, it doesnt mean that doing more cases will lead to improvement especially if you are not getting the most out of your practice.

All the best!

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Cristian
Experte
Content Creator
antwortete am 18. Aug. 2023
#1 rated MBB & McKinsey Coach

Hi there!

This happens often when candidates start developing a ‘rountine’ for doing cases.

It's the nature of our brain to seek comfort so you end up saying pretty much the same things regardless of the case. 

What I'd recommend is recording yourself doing the case and then listening to the recording. Figure out how you could make your answers more specific. 

Specificity lies mostly in either giving examples or using words that are concise (instead of overly inclusive wording). In short, the key is to become aware of thesee and recording yourself is the best way of doing it. 

Last but not least, get a coach to assess you. A good one will also work to identify what your triggers are and set you on the right path. 

Best,
Cristian

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Practicing for interviews? Check out my latest case based on a first-round MBB interview >>> SoyTechnologies  

War diese Antwort hilfreich?

Ian

Content Creator
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate
1.096
Meetings
77.649
Q&A Upvotes
232
Awards
5,0
151 Bewertungen