Hi there, 

Sorry to hear the interview didn't work out. Sometimes that happens, regardless of your level of preparation. I'll take your questions one by one.

1. There are some differences in the application process across the firms, but they are rather minor. It's rather about the format in which you will be tested rather than the content or the skills. As long as you work on the feedback provided from the McK interview you should be in a good position. Next you need to research for each of the firms and the role you are applying for what is the format of the interview process and then prepare specifically for that (your mention of candidate led interview is one aspect indeed).

2. No, it's not hard. There are a few tricks to keep in mind, but generally you are more in control of the situation and need to proactively ask for information and ‘lead’ the case. Do practice as much as you can before. Happy to help here as well if needed.

3. I would say yes. You basically showed that you have the skills and only needed a bit more work to secure an offer with one of the top MBBs. That's great signaling. 

Good luck and do reach out if you have any questions!

1. and 2. You need to get used to a diferent dynamic / interaction with the interviewer during the case. It is not hard, but you should practice this, in order to make it smooth.
Let me add that “candidate led” does not always reflect the truth, as very frequently interviewers take over. My first case at Bain was pretty much interviewer-led.

3. Yes, it means that your preparation is already good enough that you were able to pass a couple of rounds. But the fact that you missed the last round means that you need to reduce your “error rate”. 

P.S. You should apply to EY-Parthenon and Oliver Wyman as well ;)

Hi!

I'm sorry to hear it didn't work out this time.

1) I recommend working on the feedback you received from the previous interview.

2) It's not hard but you'll need to readjust your case practice accordingly.

3) Reaching the second round stage is for sure a great signal that you are on the right track to get an offer. I'm sure it'll teach you a lot for your next interviews and this will give you an edge over other candidates.

Good luck and don't hesitate to reach out if you need help to boost your preparation.

Best,

Anto 

Hey, its unfortunate that you didn't make it to McK. And well done on the positive approach of applying in other firms.

Lets break down your queries.

1. Different prep 1: You should connect with a coach and do a diagnostic to weed out any minor issues that might have prevented your final selection. Do collect feedback from McK interviewers as well.
2. Different prep 2: Clearly, you need to prepare for candidate-led-style approach of case solving. This means that you need to be more hypotheses driven and highly focused. You can no longer rely on the interviewer for direction and you need to be confident about the approach you are taking. This will get unnerving in the beginning but with practice you can punch out the fears.
3. Different prep 3: You also need to get used to a more fragmented style of PEI (more questions, shorter questions, more random questions). McK PEI is relatively more structured and allows you a longer time to present your stories
4. Candidate led cases: Its not hard, its just a different flow in the interview. Structurally, there will not be much difference - frameworks will be same, analysis will be same etc. Practice well and things will sort out. Make sure you are 80-90% prepped when you start applying. This way, you can even apply all at once and take advantage of the momentum.
5. Top candidate: You can have the confidence that you made it to McK final round - so you have the basics in you. You just need to work on the final 5% to cross the line. A coach can help you with that.