Werde aktiv in unserer Community aus über 451.000 Gleichgesinnten!

Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Case-Partner, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!

Clarifying questions in an M&A case

M&A
Neue Antwort am 13. Aug. 2020
5 Antworten
3,1 T. Views
Anonym A fragte am 17. Okt. 2018

The underlying reason for an acquisiton always helps to understand the motivations of the client and come up with synergies to consiser. Although, is it appropriate to ask this as a clarifying questin or better ask while discussing the company analysis as part of the structure?

Übersicht der Antworten

Upvotes
  • Upvotes
  • Datum aufsteigend
  • Datum absteigend
Beste Antwort
Sidi
Experte
antwortete am 17. Okt. 2018
McKinsey Senior EM & BCG Consultant | Interviewer at McK & BCG for 7 years | Coached 350+ candidates secure MBB offers

Hi Anonymous,

I have a clear view on this: the motivation for the considered move definitely has to be part of your clarifiying questions! Imperatively! I even would argue that it is impossible to carve out a meaningful and specific structure for such go/no go- cases without verifying the underlying objective first.

Your structure then needs to be rooted in the clients precise question and the corresponding criterion to answer this question (which, by pure logic, can only be defined if your know the motivation/objective).

Cheers, Sidi

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Vlad
Experte
antwortete am 17. Okt. 2018
McKinsey / Accenture Alum / Got all BIG3 offers / Harvard Business School

Hi,

Yes, definitely! You should understand:

  1. The real reasons for the acquisition
  2. Timeline for integration
  3. Expectations for synergies

In case of PE Acquisition you need also know:

  1. Synergies with the current portfolio
  2. Exit $ expectation
  3. Exit time

Best!

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Anonym antwortete am 17. Okt. 2018

Sure you can ask, especially if you frame the question like you did "to understand the motivations of the client and come up with synergies to consider". You'll either get an answer (good), or the interviewer will tell you to proceed without an answer or speculate for yourself...

But I don't believe it would be a question that can "hurt" you.

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
1
Francesco
Experte
Content Creator
antwortete am 18. Okt. 2018
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success (➡ interviewoffers.com) | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching

Hi Anonymous,

I agree with Vlad, Sidi and Elias, it is a better idea to clarify the goal of the acquisition upfront. Knowing the goal from the beginning allows to have a structure more clearly fitting the objective of the client, and ensures you don't forget to ask this question later on.

In general terms, you can always ask at the beginning questions related to:

  1. Understand how the business model of the client works
  2. Clarify the elements that were not clear in the prompt
  3. Identify the goal and the constraints of the client to achieve it

Best,
Francesco

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Anonym antwortete am 13. Aug. 2020

Dear Anonymous!

Yes, it is advisable for you to ask this question from the very beginning to have a clearer picture of what your client wants. Actually, before starting your case solving you can ask 2 or even 3 clarifying questions, it would be all right.

It is also important to ask questions about the objective of the case interview, information that strengthens your understanding of the company, and definitions of terms you are unfamiliar with.

Best,

André

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
1

Sidi

McKinsey Senior EM & BCG Consultant | Interviewer at McK & BCG for 7 years | Coached 350+ candidates secure MBB offers
429
Meetings
5.846
Q&A Upvotes
78
Awards
5,0
134 Bewertungen