It says in the analysis of the case that Poker Inc would simply get existing customers in KV if they open a casino there as a response to a new entrant. Which means, instead of losing $113m they would retain those customers. However, wouldn't it be possible that opening a second casino in KV increases the customer base somehow? In which case Poker Inc would have an extra opportunity for revenue (not just the $113 that is retained)
Werde aktiv in unserer Community aus über 452.000 Gleichgesinnten!
Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Case-Partner, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!
I find it weird that expansion of market is not considered
Übersicht der Antworten
Upvotes
Hello!
Not only that, but also cross-sell and up-sell opportunities
Hope it helps!
Cheers,
Clara
War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Beste Antwort
Hello Radhia,
your point is fair and it would be fine to discuss it with the interviewer. The main hypothesis should be that you can gain some gamblers that are usually going in other casinos in Royal City.
Yet, the hypothesis of the proposed solution is that, since both you and competitors will have a casino in KV, you will both have the same market share of today. This results in no change of the revenues.
Does it make sense?
Luca
War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Hi! I agree, your logic works – opening a second casino may definitely lead to an increase of the customer base, so it's an additional opportunity.
War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Hi radhi, I agree with you, it deserves a deep dive and you can totally propose it to the interviewer
Best,
Antonello
War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Content Creator
BCG |NASA | SDA Bocconi & Cattolica partner | GMAT expert 780/800 score | 200+ students coached
65
Meetings
3.106
Q&A Upvotes
33
Awards
19 Bewertungen