Topic Overview
Topic Overview
Back to overview

Public Value Strategic Triangle

The Strategic Public Value Triangle is a conceptual framework developed by Prof. Mark H. Moore to guide public managers in creating public value. It emphasizes the interplay between three key elements: public value proposition, the operational capacity to deliver, and the legitimacy and support of the authorizing environment.

The Strategic Public Value Triangle showing the interaction between Public Value, Operational Capacity, and Legitimacy & Support.

Prof. Mark H. Moore is a distinguished academic known for his work in public management and leadership. He is the Hauser Professor of Nonprofit Organizations at the Harvard Kennedy School. Moore's research and teachings have significantly influenced the field of public administration, particularly with the introduction of the Strategic Public Triangle in his seminal book "Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government" published in 1995.

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Strategic Public Triangle

The Strategic Public Triangle serves as a guiding tool for consultants working in the public sector. It aids them in:

  1. Identifying the value their initiatives bring to the public.
  2. Ensuring they have the operational capability to deliver on their promises.
  3. Securing the necessary legitimacy and support from stakeholders, including political authorizers, beneficiaries, and the broader public.

Advantages:

  • Holistic Approach: The Strategic Triangle offers a comprehensive view of public management. It doesn't just focus on the value delivered but also takes into account the means of delivery and the surrounding environment. For instance, when a city plans to introduce a new public transportation system, the triangle would prompt officials to consider not just the efficiency of the system, but also the infrastructure required and the public's reception to the change.
  • Flexibility: The framework is versatile and can be applied across various public sector contexts, from local to federal levels. For example, whether a small town is trying to improve its local library services or a national government is overhauling its healthcare system, the Strategic Public Value Triangle can guide decision-making.
  • Stakeholder Engagement: The triangle emphasizes the importance of legitimacy and support, ensuring that public managers remain deeply connected with their stakeholders. When a public school district, for instance, wants to revise its curriculum, using the triangle would mean not just focusing on educational outcomes but also engaging with parents, teachers, and students to gain their support.

Disadvantages:

  • Complexity: The intricate interplay between the triangle's three elements can be challenging to navigate. For instance, a public health initiative aiming to reduce smoking might deliver public value and have operational capability, but if it doesn't gain the support of certain influential groups, its effectiveness could be compromised.
  • Potential for Overemphasis: There's a risk that public managers might focus too much on one element of the triangle at the expense of the others. A city might, for example, pour resources into a state-of-the-art waste management facility (operational capability) but neglect to consider whether the public sees it as a priority (public value) or if it has the political backing needed (legitimacy and support).
  • Requires Continuous Monitoring: The dynamics of the public sector mean that the elements of the triangle can change rapidly. A policy that enjoys broad public support today might face opposition tomorrow due to changing political or social climates. For example, a renewable energy initiative that is popular during a period of environmental activism might lose traction if economic downturns shift public focus to immediate job creation.

 

Alternative Frameworks

Several other management and strategic frameworks can be applied in the public sector, including:

  1. SWOT Analysis: Evaluates strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
  2. Balanced Scorecard: Focuses on performance metrics across various perspectives.
  3. PESTEL Analysis: Considers political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal factors affecting an organization.
  4. Logic Model: A tool used to visualize the relationship between resources, activities, outputs, and outcomes of a program.
     

A Concept for Understanding Public Value

The Strategic Public Triangle, conceptualized by Prof. Mark H. Moore, helps consultants in public management. It underscores the necessity of not only delivering tangible value to the public but also ensuring that the means of delivery are robust and that there's a harmonious relationship with the surrounding political and social environment. While it offers a comprehensive and flexible approach, it also demands astute understanding and continuous engagement from public managers. In an ever-evolving public sector landscape, tools like the Strategic Public Triangle remain indispensable, guiding public servants and consultants alike in their quest to create lasting public value. As with any framework, its effectiveness lies in its application, urging those in the public realm to strike a balance between value, capability, and legitimacy.

Let's Move On With the Next Articles:

GROW Model
Useful Business Analysis Tools
The GROW model, an acronym for Goal, Reality, Options, and Will, was developed in the late 1980s by Sir John Whitmore and his colleagues Graham Alexander and Alan Fine. It emerged from the realization that traditional training methods often failed to achieve sustainable performance improvements. Whitmore, a former racing driver and a pioneer in the field of executive coaching, played a significant role in popularizing the model and establishing it as a method for performance enhancement in the business world.
To the article
Hoshin Kanri Matrix
Useful Business Analysis Tools
The Hoshin Kanri Matrix is a clever way to steer corporate goals and to understand how large organizations implement their strategies. In this article, you'll get an overview of this tool and how you can use it in a case interview. Historical BackgroundThe Hoshin Kanri Matrix has its roots in post-war Japan and became known as part of Toyota's revolutionary production system, which also produced the Kanban system. Although Hoshin Kanri and Kanban are different management tools, they share the philosophy of continuous improvement and efficiency enhancement that made Toyota one of the most innovative car manufacturers of its time.Toyota was a pioneer in applying principles that are known today as Lean Management. The Hoshin Kanri Matrix emerged in this innovative environment and helped the company link its long-term visions and goals with daily activities and decisions. It was a decisive factor in enabling Toyota to set standards not only in production but also in strategic planning and goal setting. Core Principles and Practical InsightsThe Hoshin Kanri Matrix is based on several core principles that are crucial for understanding its functioning and its practical application at Toyota.Core Principles:Vision and Goal Setting: Everything starts with a clear vision. At Toyota, this vision is broken down into specific, measurable goals that the company wants to achieve.Cascading of Goals: The goals are then "cascaded" through the various levels of the company. This means that the overarching goals are divided into smaller, department- and team-related goals, all aligned with the end goal.Participative Management: Toyota places great importance on the involvement of employees at all levels in the goal-setting process and in reviewing progress. This promotes engagement and accountability.PDCA Cycle (Plan-Do-Check-Act): This cycle is the backbone of continuous improvement at Toyota. Each step is carefully planned, implemented, reviewed, and adjusted to ensure that the goals are met. Practical Insight into the Process at ToyotaAt Toyota, the Hoshin Kanri Matrix is applied in an annual cycle that begins with setting the company vision and strategic goals.Here's an insight into the process:Annual Planning: At the beginning of the year, the long-term goals of the company are reviewed and converted into annual goals. These are then translated into concrete actions required to achieve these goals.Goal Cascading: The annual goals are passed on to the various departments, which then set their own specific goals to contribute to the achievement of the company's goals.Monthly Reviews: Every month, there are reviews where teams present their progress towards the goals. This allows for early identification and addressing of issues.Annual Review: At the end of the year, a comprehensive review is conducted to assess the extent to which the goals have been achieved and to draw lessons for the planning of the next year.This structured approach allows Toyota to use its resources efficiently and ensures that all activities are aligned with the overarching corporate goals. The Hoshin Kanri Matrix serves as a guide that helps maintain focus while allowing room for adjustments and improvements. Comparison with Other Strategic ToolsCompared to other frameworks like the Balanced Scorecard or OKRs, Hoshin Kanri offers a more integrative approach that supports the alignment of the entire organization with core goals. It is particularly useful when it comes to linking long-term visions with short-term actions.Balanced Scorecard (BSC): The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that organizations use to communicate their vision and strategy across a broad spectrum of performance indicators that include financial, customer-related, internal process, and learning/growth perspectives.Objectives and Key Results (OKRs):OKRs are a goal-setting framework that defines objectives and their measurable outcomes (Key Results) to track progress and align teams.These tools are not mutually exclusive and can often be used in combination to provide a comprehensive strategic analysis. Each tool has its strengths in certain contexts, and it's important to choose the right tool for the specific strategic question. The Hoshin Kanri Matrix in the Case InterviewIn case interviews, candidates are expected to quickly grasp complex business problems, analyze them in a structured way, and present effective solutions. The Hoshin Kanri Matrix can serve as a powerful tool to organize your thoughts and develop a clear action plan.Here are some case types and structuring possibilities where the Hoshin Kanri Matrix can be particularly useful:Strategy Development: For cases requiring the development of a corporate strategy, you can use the Hoshin Kanri Matrix to ensure that the proposed strategy aligns with the company's long-term goals and that there are clear actions to achieve these goals.Organizational Change: When faced with a case that requires comprehensive change within the organization, the Hoshin Kanri Matrix can help identify and prioritize key initiatives to drive the change and ensure alignment with overarching goals.Performance Management: In cases focused on improving operational performance, the Hoshin Kanri Matrix can help define key performance indicators and create a framework for regular reviews and adjustments.Product Development: In product development cases, you can use the Hoshin Kanri Matrix to ensure that product development initiatives are aligned with the company's strategic goals and that there are clear responsibilities and timelines. Alternative Structuring OptionsIssue Trees: Issue Trees are logical frameworks that help break down a problem into its components. They can be used to develop and test hypotheses and to ensure that all aspects of a problem are considered.MECE Principle (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive): The MECE principle is an approach to structuring information that aims to avoid overlaps while ensuring that all relevant aspects are considered. It is particularly useful to ensure that your analysis is complete and well-organized.Hypothesis-Driven Approaches: In some cases, it is more effective to start with a strong hypothesis and then collect data to confirm or refute it. This approach can save time and shows that you are able to come to an informed opinion based on limited information. Challenges and Limitations of the Hoshin Kanri MatrixThe Hoshin Kanri Matrix is a powerful tool for strategic planning and alignment, but it does not come without challenges and limitations.Here are some points you should consider:Complexity in Implementation: Successful implementation of the Hoshin Kanri Matrix requires a high degree of discipline and commitment from all levels of an organization. This can be difficult to achieve in practice, especially in large or decentralized companies.Time Investment: Developing and reviewing Hoshin plans can be time-consuming. Companies must be willing to invest the necessary time to regularly review and adjust the plans.Cultural Adaptation: Hoshin Kanri requires a culture of openness and continuous learning. In a culture that does not tolerate mistakes or where departmental silos prevail, it can be difficult to implement Hoshin Kanri effectively.Excessive Focus on Long-Term Goals: While the long-term orientation of Hoshin Kanri is beneficial, it can lead to overlooking short-term opportunities and threats.Resource Allocation: The matrix can lead to resources being directed to areas that are strategically important, but may not necessarily represent the most urgent needs or the best short-term opportunities for the company. ConclusionThe Hoshin Kanri Matrix is a tool that can create strategic clarity and alignment. It promotes a culture of continuous improvement and helps focus a company's efforts on its most important goals.For aspiring consultants, it is important to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the Hoshin Kanri Matrix and to know when and how it is best used.In case interviews, knowledge of such tools and the ability to apply them appropriately can be a decisive advantage. It shows that you not only have the necessary theoretical knowledge, but are also able to implement this knowledge practically and adapt it to the specific needs of each case.
To the article
The Stacey Matrix
Useful Business Analysis Tools
The Stacey Matrix is an important tool for navigating complexity in project management, developed by Ralph Douglas Stacey in the 1990s.In this article, we’ll break down how the matrix works, explore different project types, and discuss its relevance in consulting and case interviews. Plus, we’ll dive into its strengths and limitations in project management. Let’s get started!
To the article