MECE is a best practice method to lay down a robust structure for your case interview

Use MECE segmentations to group information in a logical manner

MECE is a way of segmenting information into sub-elements that are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive. In other words, elements should “exclude” each other, i.e. be distinct and should “exhaust” the relevant field, i.e. contain everything that belongs to it. MECE as a method should be used when you craft an issue tree for your case structure. Doing so will help you avoid dependencies between different branches of the tree and thus sub-problems can be properly isolated.

Mutually Exclusive: aims at reducing complexity by avoiding overlaps. You need to make sure that the possible solutions or groups are not accidentally considered twice. Proving exclusiveness forces you to carefully look at each option, consequently leading you to a much deeper understanding of the issue.

Collectively Exhaustive: aims at ensuring a comprehensive collection without leaving alternatives. Exhaustive means that all possible options have been considered. The trick is to divide a problem into categories with a finite number of general groups. For example, if you need to make “means of transportation” MECE, don't start just collecting “per foot, train, plane, bicyle, bike etc.” Try to find categories, because this practice will prevent you from forgetting important options: wheels vs. no wheels OR air vs. water vs. land.

Learn the difference between MECE and non-MECE

Another example for a MECE breakdown is dividing the population into subsets of age:

  • A group of people below 50 years and another group of 50 years and above is MECE. No person can be in both groups - mutually exclusive - but every person is in either one of them – collectively exhaustive

MECE, mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive

  • A group of people below 50 years and another group with people from 40 to 70 years is not MECE, as people from 40 to 50 years belong to both groups - they are not mutually exclusive – and people above 70 are in neither one of the groups – they are not collectively exhaustive.

​​MECE, mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive

Be MECE in profitability cases to split costs and revenue in an issue tree

The MECE methodology is famously used at McKinsey. McKinsey interviewers along with other firms will especially look whether you are able to structure information in a MECE format. During a case, MECE is also helpful for calculation. Many well-known frameworks, such as Cost-Benefit, 4Cs, Porter’s Five Forces are all designed with the MECE principle in mind.

The example below, from the "Startup vs. Consulting case" on PrepLounge, shows how costs are typically broken down in a MECE way. Subsequently, an issue tree-like format is used to break down the estimation into its basic components for easier approximation of data.

MECE issue tree of costs

Interested in cracking this case? Solve it now!

Quiz

1
2
3
4
5
Finish Summary

The selected solution is not correct.

The selected solution is correct.

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Retake Quiz
1 Comment(s)
September 26, 2016 12:21 -
Abdul

I have read many articles and books on MECE.. but you have managed to explain it in a way that immediately clicked. Thanks!

Related consulting question(s)

Two frameworks here: 4 Ps (= price, place, product, promotion), or the Ansoff Matrix (grow with existing or new products in existing or new markets). Both are quite MECE. Word of caution however --... (more)

Hi Levia, happy to answer your question again! This is a great question IMO and I think one of the biggest challenges to implement especially in a pressure interview situation where no c... (more)

Hi there, You are correct regarging the fact that your notes shoud be clear and neat, so that interviewers can follow your thought process easily and that issue trees are key to havi... (more)

Best answer so far:
Peter
Expert
ex-Bain Case Team Leader and professional recruiter

In general, my advice would be to be focused on the exact question asked. Typical cases will have 3-4 questions and whilst it's nice to draw links back to the original question (e.g. declining profita... (more)