Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Interview-Partner:innen, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!
Zurück zur Übersicht

In an issue tree for profitability framework, where do you factor in questions about market etc.?

E.g. addressing a decline in profitability.

The standard issue tree would include revenue and cost, but where would you include an overview of the market/competition/etc.? I usually make a side note but that doesn't make it very MECE - is there a different type of issue tree to use?

I feel like this is such a simple question but can't figure out how to structure this properly.

2
6,9k
21
Schreibe die erste Antwort!
Bisher hat niemand auf diese Frage reagiert.
Beste Antwort
Sidi
Coach
bearbeitet am 12. Aug. 2024
McKinsey Senior EM & BCG Consultant | Interviewer at McK & BCG for 7 years | Coached 400+ candidates secure MBB offers

Hi Kay,

this is indeed one of the fundamental things that you need to learn in order to rigorously disaggregate the value drivers of a business. The driver tree allows you to identify the numerical drivers and sub-drivers of profits. The qualitative elements (such as consumer demand, market structure, company operations, etc.) then have to be mapped to the sub-branches of the tree!

Hence, your analysis has two steps. Imagine you want to run a diagnostic on why profits have fallen. First you need to identify the numerical driver of the problem (e.g., customer base is shrinking). This gives you an understanding of the WHAT. The second step is the understanding of the WHY! To do this, you have to examine the qualitative elements that link to the "number of customers"-sub-branch in your driver tree (e.g., competitive situation, market entries, new substitutes, relative price point, customer preferences, product/service properties vs. competition, etc.)

You can think of these qualitative elements as the typical business situation framework elements (see V. Cheng et al.) - but here, they are not hanging in the air, but they are embedded in a rigorous thinking frame which emerges from the disaggregation of value drivers and linking it to qualitative reasons.

Cheers, Sidi

_______________________

Dr. Sidi Koné 

Former Senior Engagement Manager & Interviewer at McKinsey | Former Senior Consultant at BCG | Co-Founder of The MBB Offer Machine™

Gelöschter Nutzer
am 30. März 2020
Hi Sidi, would you communicate the two steps seperately or after the Revenue analys of the numerical drivers, you will look at potential factors that are causing the problem?
Anonym
am 14. Nov. 2021
Hi Sidi, I have the same question. My understanding is that you first build a driver tree for the 1st step to identify the numerical drivers. At this point, there are no qualitative elements in your framework. Let's say we did some math and understood that the problem is customer base shrinkage. After identifying the problem, you ask the interviewer to give you some additional time to further build upon the initial framework by incorporating qualitative elements related to customer base shrinkage.
If I understood your approach correctly, wouldn't the interviewer think that the initial framework is not complete? In other words, we don't show the interviewer a complete framework at the beginning. This is more efficient as you said, but it does not show an end-to-end solution to the problem at the beginning of the case.
am 26. Okt. 2023
#1 Rated McKinsey Coach | Top MBB Coach | Verifiable success rates

Exactly. 

Great question. 

You can't really. By default a profitability tree makes you blind to external factors. 

Which is why you shouldn't be following frameworks as a default answer to case prompts. 

Lots of great answers below already. Adding a guide on structuring techniques that could help other candidates looking into this topic:

Best,
Cristian

———————————————

Practicing for interviews? Check out my latest case based on a first-round MBB interview >>> SoyTechnologies  

Ähnliche Fragen
Consulting
Frage zu
Using the Issue Tree
am 27. Aug. 2024
Global
4
1,2k
Beste Antwort von
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 9+ years consulting, interviewing and coaching experience
48
4 Antworten
1,2k Aufrufe
+1
Consulting
How to improve framework creativty
am 17. Okt. 2024
Global
3
1,3k
Beste Antwort von
Florian
Coach
1400 5-star reviews across platforms | 600+ offers | Highest-rated case book on Amazon | Uni lecturer in US, Asia, EU
58
3 Antworten
1,3k Aufrufe
Consulting
Drafting a strawman/storyline for a deck
am 17. Okt. 2024
Global
1
1,4k
Beste Antwort von
Alessa
Coach
xMcKinsey & Company | xBCG | +200 individual & group coachings | feel free to schedule a 15 min intro call for free
34
1 Antwort
1,4k Aufrufe