Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Interview-Partner:innen, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!
Zurück zur Übersicht

When should I break down costs as Fixed and Variable as opposed to over the value chain?

I want to understand in which situations I should break down costs into fixed and variable and when to use the value chain breakdown.

8
4,5k
28
Schreibe die erste Antwort!
Bisher hat niemand auf diese Frage reagiert.
Beste Antwort
Ian
Coach
am 11. Feb. 2020
Top US BCG / MBB Coach - 5,000 sessions |Tech, Platinion, Big 4 | 9/9 personal interviews passed | 95% candidate success

It's not necessarily an and/or. When thinking about FC and VC you should also be thinking about the value chain.

For example:Raw Mats (VC) and R&D (FC) are at the beginning of the chain. Labour (FC or VC), electricity (VC), and rent (Generally FC) are in the middle (production/manufacturing). Transport/shipping/delivery (can be FC or VC) is at the end.

That being said, if you clearly have an operational prompt (i.e. we're seeing bottlenecks that have cause an increae in our costs), then go value-chain. Likewise, if you hear "We've seen costs rising over the past 3 years", and you can generally go FC/VC. However, if you get the same question and you're a vertically integrated company (perhaps Oil&Gas), you may want to talk about both simultaneously (keep it structured though).

Make sense?

Vlad
Coach
am 11. Feb. 2020
McKinsey / Accenture Alum / Got all BIG3 offers / Harvard Business School

Hi,

It depends on the objective. If you are trying to calculate the synergies between the two companies - it's more clear when you go through the value chain rather than FC / VC split. Also In some complex business, it's easier to draw the value chain and then define the costs in each part (e.g. if the business has mining, production, distribution)

Best

am 11. Feb. 2020
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success: ➡ interviewoffers.com | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching

Hi Anonymous,

they are both fine as a division. Personally I recommend to divide in fix and variable as a first level of your analysis, and use the value chain to then brainstorm costs in each of the two components.

Best,

Francesco

Clara
Coach
am 11. Feb. 2020
McKinsey | Awarded professor at Master in Management @ IE | MBA at MIT |+180 students coached | Integrated FIT Guide aut

Hello!

This is one of the questions for which there is not a "categoric" question, because both breakdowns can be perfectly fine if they are well argumented. 

I would say that in most cases, Fixed vs. Variable is an easier way to tackle down these kind of problems. However, keep your eyes open for hints that point you towards a value-chain approach (e.g., issues in the process, total costs of revenues going down in time, etc.) 

Hope it helps. 

Cheers, 

Clara

Udayan
Coach
am 13. Feb. 2020
Top rated Case & PEI coach/Multiple real offers/McKinsey EM in New York /12 years recruiting experience

It might be helpful to do both. Start with FC/VC and then go down deeper into the value chain breakdown

Luca
Coach
am 29. Feb. 2020
BCG |NASA | SDA Bocconi & Cattolica partner | GMAT expert 780/800 score | 200+ students coached

Hello,

You can use both. In my opinion it's better to use the split Fixed/variable because it helps you to identify what varies with volume and what is an invariant. More over, there are some similarities in the ways to decrease variable costs, that are completely different from the methods to reduce incidence of fixed costs.

Best,
Luca

Gelöschter Nutzer
am 11. Feb. 2020

Hey A,

it is alwoys a case-by-case decision.

Your business judgement and intuitition develops with the amount of cases you have sold.

So more cases your practice the better feeleing you get, when you should apply any specific case structuring.

Hope it helps.

Best,

André

0
am 11. Feb. 2020
McKinsey | NASA | top 10 FT MBA professor for consulting interviews | 6+ years of coaching

I confirm it depends on the specific case. Generally speaking, FC/VC is always good, and then you can deep dive - depending on the case - with a value chain breakdown

Ähnliche Fragen
Consulting
Just did the Mckinsey Solve Game (January 2025) - got some questions/insights
am 24. Apr. 2025
Global
5
3,9k
Beste Antwort von
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience
42
5 Antworten
3,9k Aufrufe
+2
Consulting
BCG PIPE Case
am 28. Feb. 2025
Global
7
2,1k
Beste Antwort von
Ariadna
Coach
BCG | Project Leader and Experienced Interviewer | MBA at London Business School
50
7 Antworten
2,1k Aufrufe
+4
Consulting
What do they look in a candidate?
am 31. Aug. 2024
Global
5
1,4k
Beste Antwort von
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience
65
5 Antworten
1,4k Aufrufe
+2
Wie wahrscheinlich ist es, dass du uns einem Freund oder Kommilitonen empfiehlst?
0 = Nicht wahrscheinlich
10 = Sehr wahrscheinlich
Vielen Dank für dein Feedback! Deine Meinung hilft uns, PrepLounge noch besser zu machen.