Can someone roughly explain how the interview process is different (or similar) at McKinsey from other strategy houses, I'm asking for Dubai offices in particular.
Also, how does the McKinsey-style case interview differ from others? I know it's interviewer-led, but what does that really mean to the interviewee
McKinsey interviews vs others (Dubai Office)


Hi there,
There are two main differences between a McKinsey vs. BCG/ Bain interview
1. Interviewer-led
While there are many similarities between McKinsey interviews and interviews with other firms, McKinsey interviews are interviewer-led, while other firms employ a candidate-led format.
McKinsey, BCG, and Bain cases have certain things in common:
- The elements of the cases are the same. You will have to structure problems, interpret exhibits, work through some calculations, come up with recommendations or implications, etc.
- The skills that are assessed are the same. You need to exhibit strong problem-solving skills, creativity, ability to work under pressure, top-down communication, etc.
However, there is one key difference:
- In interviewer-led cases, you take ownership of every question and go into greater detail here, while the interviewer guides you from question to question. In the interviewee-led case, you drive the whole case and have to move along, get the correct information to work with by asking the right questions, and analyze the problem to then deduct a recommendation
In a McKinsey case, the interviewer will guide you through a series of connected questions that you need to answer, synthesize, and develop recommendations from. There are clear directions and a flow of questions, which you need to answer with a hypothesis-driven mindset.
In a candidate-led BCG case interview or Bain case interview, due to the nature of your role as an investigator, it is much easier to get lost, walk down a wrong branch of the issue tree, and waste a ton of time. While the interviewers will try to influence you to move in the right direction (pay attention to their hints), it is still up to you what elements of the problem you would like to analyze. Each answer should lead to a new question (hypothesis-driven) on your quest to find the root cause of the problem to come up with a recommendation on how to overcome it.
Nonetheless, also in a McKinsey case, you need to demonstrate an ownership mentality within each question asked!
2. Highly standardized with a focus on exhaustive answers, not single correct answers
McKinsey interviews are highly standardized across interviewers and offices, 99% of the time following the same format and progression.
How does that translate into practice? Let's take structuring as an example:
At the core, McKinsey wants to see creative ideas communicated in a structured manner, the more exhaustive the better.
Your goal should be to come up with a tailored and creative answer that fits the question. The framework should - broadly speaking - follow these three characteristics:
- Broad
- Deep
- Insightful
In a McKinsey interview, you can take up to 6-8 minutes to present your structure, your qualification, and hypotheses. This is due to the interviewer-led format that McK employs. The interviewer will only ask 'what else' if you
- haven't gone broad or deep enough
- did not explain your ideas well enough for them to stand out (again, you have time here)
The firm wants to see exhaustive and creative approaches to specific problems, which more often than not do not fit into the classic case interview frameworks that were en vogue 10 years ago...
Again, this only applies if everything you say
- adds value to the problem analysis
- is MECE
- is well qualified
- includes a detailed discussion of your hypotheses
The difference in format and way of answering a question is the reason why I recommend preparing very differently for McK interviews vs. other consultancies.
If you want to learn more about that format, read the article I wrote here: https://www.preplounge.com/en/mckinsey-interview
On top of that, the fit part is also very different at McKinsey. If you want to learn about the PEI, read this article I wrote here: https://www.preplounge.com/en/mckinsey-pei
Cheers,
Florian

Hi there,
There main differences that you will find between McKinsey and other companies are the following:
1) McKinsey includes the PEI (Personal Experience Interview) as part of their fit part.
- They will usually ask for one story per dimension in each interview out of Inclusive Leadership, Personal Impact and Entrepreneurial Drive.
- Other companies may or may not ask something similar, while at McKinsey you should expect one story in every interview with a consultant.
- For more info on PEI you can check this – PEI Dimensions
2) McKinsey follows an interviewer-led approach in most cases.
- This means that after presenting the answer to a question, the interviewer will ask you the following question he/she planned, irrespectively of where you want to move the analysis.
- When a company uses an interviewee-led approach, instead, you have to propose a plan of action and the interviewer will leave to you to follow that approach, only occasionally correcting you (meaning you have to lead the case).
- The interviewer-led approach is easier to follow for most candidates, meaning that if you know how to manage an interviewee-led case you should not have issues with it (the opposite instead is not true - if you only know how to navigate interviewer-led cases you may have issues driving a case).
- In final rounds, you may occasionally get interviewee-led cases also at McKinsey
3) The structure expected at McKinsey should have several levels.
- If you are already used to have detailed structures, this should not have an impact.
- If that’s not the case, you have to work to ensure your structure is detailed in all the parts required for the analysis
4) McKinsey cases don’t usually have conclusions.
- However, occasionally they may still ask for them
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
As next steps for your preparation for each of the previous points, I would recommend the following:
- Write down 2 stories for each of the 3 PEI dimensions (6 stories in total)
- Prepare for interviewer-led cases but be ready for interviewee-led as well. The reason why you need both is that (i) occasionally you may get interviewee-led cases at McKinsey as well (normally in finals) and (ii) if you can manage interviewee-led cases you won’t have problems with the interviewer-led approach, while the opposite is not true
- Develop structures that are articulated with several levels of detail. If you are used to very complete structures, you may be already fine with this
- Review how to structure conclusions, even if they are not common. Most of the time there won’t be one, but occasionally they may request to provide it
If you need help for McKinsey Dubai please feel free to PM me, I helped several candidates to land offers there and know 20+ real case questions asked there.
Best,
Francesco

Hi there,
A very good answer from Florian! Naturally, you will want to look at McKinsey practice cases in a next step. However, here's a word of “warning”.
There is not a single case out there in any MBA case book or other resource that is actually “McKinsey style”. They incorporate some elements but still get it wrong at least 99% of the time… Even the practice cases on the McKinsey website don't give you the full picture (which is done purposefully).
This has thrown off a lot of candidates who thought they were doing the right thing but encountered something unexpected during the actual interviews, which sent them down the wrong path.
I used to be a McKinsey interviewer and I have my own library of McKinsey cases that are exactly as you'll encounter them in real life. Needless to say that this comes with a full breakdown of what McKinsey is looking for and what you must do to succeed. Feel free to get in touch if you're interested.
Best,
Moritz

Hi there,
Great questions!
How does the interviewing process differ? Overall, it doesn't differ by much. McK does an initial CV/cover letter screening like all other firms. Then they have an additional screening round where your analytical abilities are going to be tested in a game. Most other firms have online cases with multiple questions to solve (BCG) or GMAT / text comprehension questions (Big4). Then you usually have 2 rounds of interview with 2-3 interviews each. The first round is with senior consultants, while the second round is with Partners. Each interview consists of a case and a personal fit story.
How do the cases differ? Basically, in a candidate-led case the candidate is meant to start with a hypothesis and gradually probe and lead the case in order to arrive at the solution the case is asking for. In McKinsey interviews you are provided with direct questions which you are meant to solve, so the candidate is more responsive rather than proactive. In a way, I find McK-style cases easier for the candidate.

Hi there,
It's going to be hard to summarize this in a Q&A, but my main advice is that you get googling! This Q&A is really just the start: There's a lot more work ahead of you to learn this.
Ultimately, McKinsey is interviewer-led while most other companies are candidate led. This means the interviewer more or less “tells you what to do”. They will prompt you to brainstorm, do math, process a chart/exhibit in a certain way etc. Honestly, you just need to get cases in a McKinsey-style to really understand “what that really means to the interviewee”.
Additionally, make sure you're well prepared for the PEI - it is much longer and more in-depth than the fit for other companies.
Good luck!

Hi there,
I would recommend to use following resources:
https://www.preplounge.com/en/articles/mckinsey-pei
https://www.preplounge.com/en/articles/mckinsey-interview
https://www.mckinsey.com/careers/interviewing
Good luck!
Lucie
Was this answer helpful?










