Werde aktiv in unserer Community aus über 451.000 Gleichgesinnten!

Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Case-Partner, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!
Frage gesperrt
Diese Frage ist schreibgeschützt, da sie mit folgender Frage zusammengefügt wurde: Hi all - does anyone have any material to prep mental maths? Thanks a lot!.

Are there any math Short-Cuts for the quantitative Section?

case math
Neue Antwort am 23. Jan. 2020
4 Antworten
1,2 T. Views
Peter fragte am 23. Jan. 2020

I am still struggling with calculating efficiently.

  • North America: 23 employees * 8 hours a day * 220 days a year * (1,4 * 25 EUR/hour) = EUR 1,416.800

Are there any shortcuts to this calculation or do I just have to get quicker with my pen&paper math (long multiplications). Even if I summarize the calculation to 23 * 1760 * 35, I feel that I still need long multiplication to solve it.

Do I miss the obvious here? Or is long multiplication indeed intended for this calculation?

Übersicht der Antworten

Upvotes
  • Upvotes
  • Datum aufsteigend
  • Datum absteigend
Beste Antwort
Alexander antwortete am 23. Jan. 2020

With multiple-factor multiplications like these it is often a good idea to change the order of operations and group the numbers more efficiently.

As a first step, I would propose the following:

((25 * 8) * 1.4) * 220 * 23 = (200*1.4) * 220 * 23 = 280 * 220 * 23

As a second step, the 280 * 220 can be simplified using the distance-of-squares method. Both numbers are 30 away from 250, so you can calculate the result as follows:

280 * 220 = 250^2 - 30^2 = 62500 - 900 = 61600

Please note that there is a shortcut for squares ending in 5 that I've used here - basically, if you square a number ending in 5, take the non-unit digit, multiply it with itself + 10, and add 25.

And now the calculation boils down to 61600 * 23, which I would treat as such:

61600 * 23 = 61600 * 20 + 61600 * 3 = 1232000 + 184800 = 1416800

Hope this helps!

Upvotes
3
Clara
Experte
Content Creator
antwortete am 23. Jan. 2020
McKinsey | Awarded professor at Master in Management @ IE | MBA at MIT |+180 students coached | Integrated FIT Guide aut

Hello!

I would:

  • 1st: write the whole equation, just as you did in the post
  • 2nd: try to re-arrange it in a way in which you find easy relationships among numers (when possible) -e.g., 8*25 is 200, which multiplied per 220 is raughly 200 squared, etc.) This for sure depends on if you are allowed to round up numbers or not, which is something you should clarify with the interviewer)

Hope it helps!

Cheers,

Clara

Vlad
Experte
antwortete am 23. Jan. 2020
McKinsey / Accenture Alum / Got all BIG3 offers / Harvard Business School

Hi,

I recommend this video to learn how to multiply double-digit numbers really fast. In my opinion it's the biggest contributor to the speed of calculations:

Learn how to multiply double digit numbers (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ndkkPZYJHo)

Best

Sash
Erfahren
antwortete am 23. Jan. 2020

I agree with Alexander. It is always easy to change the order and calculate. Preference should be given to those that result in round numbers. I would proceed in the following way:

First multiply 8*25 and then multiply the result 200 with 1,4. Till that it's quite simple. Multiplying 280 with 220 and 23 is the hard part. You can break 220 and 23 into 200+20 and 23. If you notice multiplying by 2 is not that difficult. So multiplying (200+20) with (23) would yield 4600+460 = 5060. Now multiply 280 by (10000/2 + 60) = 1,400,000+16,800 = 1,416,800

(25*8)*(1.4)*(200+20)(23) = 200*1.4*(4600+460) = 280*(5000+60) = 280*(10,000/2 + 60) = 1,400,000 + 16,800 = 1,416,800. If you find multipluying with 60 is hard, then you can break it into (100/2 + 10).

Hope this helps!

Upvotes
1
Wie wahrscheinlich ist es, dass du uns einem Freund oder Kommilitonen empfiehlst?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Nicht wahrscheinlich
10 = Sehr wahrscheinlich