PrepLounge - Link zur Homepage PrepLounge - Link zur Homepage
Consulting Consulting
Consulting Finance General
Login Kostenlos anmelden Kostenlos anmelden
Consulting Finance General
Community
Meeting-Board
Consulting Q&A
Interview-Partner
Premium-Mitgliedschaft
Coaching
Coaches
Coaching-Pakete
Consulting Q&A
Übungsmaterial
Case-Interview-Basics
Case-Sammlung
AI Casebot
Tests & Guides
Kopfrechen-Tool
Stressfragen-Modus
Drills
Video-Tutorials
Brainteaser
Karriere
Neu
Arbeitgeber
Karriere-Events
Speed Recruiting
Match Your Career
Neu
Consulting-Jobs
Consulting-Blog
Kostenlos anmelden
Login
Community
Meeting-Board
Consulting Q&A
Interview-Partner
Premium-Mitgliedschaft
Coaching
Coaches
Coaching-Pakete
Consulting Q&A
Übungsmaterial
Case-Interview-Basics
Case-Sammlung
AI Casebot
Tests & Guides
Kopfrechen-Tool
Stressfragen-Modus
Drills
Video-Tutorials
Brainteaser
Karriere
Neu
Arbeitgeber
Karriere-Events
Speed Recruiting
Match Your Career
Neu
Consulting-Jobs
Consulting-Blog
Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Interview-Partner:innen, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!
Meeting-Board
Consulting Q&A
Interview-Partner
Premium-Mitgliedschaft
Zurück zur Übersicht
Anonym A
am 25. Okt. 2021
Global
Ich möchte Updates zu der Frage per E-Mail erhalten.

How can I analyze profitability cases in an outstanding way?

How can I analyze profitability cases in an outstanding way? I usually start with asking questions about whether it is a company-specific or a market-wide issue. But I struggle to then properly cut through to the deeper analysis levels. If it is a market problem, should I then do an analysis of the market? Should this then already be part of my initial structure? When practicing cases ad doing this, I oftentimes get lost and confused after some time and get stuck. So how can I aboid this and approach profitability cases in a bullet proof way?

6
3,1k
33
Schreibe eine Antwort
Schreibe die erste Antwort!
Bisher hat niemand auf diese Frage reagiert.
Beste Antwort
Sidi
Coach
bearbeitet am 12. Aug. 2024
McKinsey Senior EM & BCG Consultant | Interviewer at McK & BCG for 7 years | Coached 400+ candidates secure MBB offers

Hi! 

Alright... This will take some again. ^^ Given the underying premises of your question, and the many inaccuracies that have been spread by “case preparation books” over the last decade, I need to explain a couple of absolutetely crucial points here.

In fact your described initial approach corresponds to what is outlined in the usual case preparation books, youtube videos, etc. (mostly created by authors who have been still very junior when they left Consulting or did not even work in Consulting!). But as a matter of fact, this approach is not how a real consultant should tackle such questions! At least not in MBB.

 

Firstly, the term "profitability case" is nonsense!

 

Now, please read the above sentence again... This is super important to understand, because practically the entire "case preparation literature" is teaching this crap. What we are actually looking at here is a class of strategic problems that can be called "Diagnostic situations" - and it can comprise any observed phenomenon (a decrease in profit is just one out of hundreds of possible variations). All of these problems can (and should) be attacked by the same core logic.

 

Before delving into rather qualitative and contextual analysis (such as understanding industry phenomena), you should ALWAYS first isolate the numerical driver of the problem. This means that you have to turn around your approach! First you do a numerical analysis to unerstand what is MATHEMATICALLY driving the profit decline. Once you have isolated this problem driver, then you do a qualitative analysis to understand the UNDERLYING REASONS for this negative development of this specific driver. If you don't do it like this and stick to what is recommended in the books, you will always be extremely inefficient in your analysis, since this approach is essentially the definition of "boiling the ocean". First narrow down what area you have to understand, and only then try to understand it!

 

In your concrete case, knowing whether it's and industry problem or not is more or less useless at the start! This information has ZERO impact on your first layer of analysis if done rigorously. First you have to understand what is numerically causing the problem. Only once you have found out the problem driver, then investigating on whether competitors have the same problem is effective and helpful (because you now already know WHAT the root cause is - you just need to find out why it has emerged)!

 

Generalized approach:

 

  1. Firstly you need to identify the numerical driver of the below-benchmark profits of the company (the WHAT?-question). --> Identify the different income streams of the company; then for each income stream, draw a driver tree to find and isolate the core of the problem (compared to industry average: less customers? less revenue per customer? lower margin products sold? lower pricing? higher operational costs? etc.) If you find a below-benchmark driver, you need to dig deeper to isolate the sub-driver who is responsible for this negative performance --> the numerical problem dirver!
  2. Once the numerical problem driver is isolated, you need to understand the WHY?-question. For this, the analysis depends on what the actual problem is. If it is a cost problem, you may want to go through the entire value chain to diagnose where the difference/disadvantage lies. If it is a revenue or sales mix problem, you may want to scrutinize underlying trends and developments, competing offers, substitutes etc.
  3. Based on your quantitative (WHAT?) and qualitative (WHY?) analysis, you can develop/brainstorm strategic measures to address the qualitative reasons.
  4. Do not forget to outline potential risks of your strategic recommendation

 

This is how such problems are typically structured and tackled in top strategy consulting. NEVER start with qualitative questions - it is the most inefficient approach thinkable! First narrow down the (sub-)area that mathematically causes the problem (quantitative analysis) and THEN start asking qualitative questions to understand the underlying reasons.

 

Cheers, Sidi

_______________________

Dr. Sidi Koné 

Former Senior Engagement Manager & Interviewer at McKinsey | Former Senior Consultant at BCG | Co-Founder of The MBB Offer Machine™

49
Coach kontaktieren
0 Kommentare
Pedro
Coach
am 25. Okt. 2021
Bain | EY-Parthenon | Former Principal | 1.5h session | 30% discount 1st session

Hi there,

You seem to be looking for a specific “technique” that would allow you to solve the case well every time. That does not exist. If it did, consulting firms would not use case interview.

So the first thing you need to realize is that you need to CUSTOMIZE your approach to the specific problem, and then you need to decide the best course of action during the case with the specific information you have at any given point in time. So even if you have a great structure, how you proceed along the structure DEPENDS on the specific case (and information you collect along the way). 

How to do this can be learnt, but cannot be memorized, as there are too many possibilities. 

In terms of overall approach, this is what you have to do:

  1. What is happening: Identify precisely where the problem is (i.e. what specific driver(s) is/are causing that change in profitability). You solve this through a quantitative approach.
  2. Why is it happening: Identify the root cause of the problem. What caused that specific change in the underlying driver (this is usually qualitative).
  3. How to improve: Identify potential courses of action and decide which one is the best. Please note that it doesn't matter whether the root cause is internal or external, there is always something you can do about it. 

Finally, you should NEVER ask whether the problem is company driven or market driven. It is your job as a candidate to perform the necessary analysis to find out the answer, not the interviewers job to answer that question. If your peers are answering, they are not representing what a real interviewer would do in a real case (I would never answer that question).

So when you present your “structure”, what you should be laying out is actually the set of potential analysis that you would perform to understand whether the problem is “internal” or “external”.

So you have to ask yourself the question: what set of analysis do I need to perform to understand whether the problem is internal or external, and where it lays exactly? You need to lay out a comprehensive set of hypothesis (and underlying analysis) to answer that question.

This is hard to explain in writing, and is part of the core of good coaching sessions.

So I hope this was helpful, and feel free to reach out if you want a more personalized session to help you improving your approach to case interviews.

Pedro

21
Coach kontaktieren
0 Kommentare
Ian
Coach
bearbeitet am 26. Okt. 2021
Top US BCG / MBB Coach - 5,000 sessions |Tech, Platinion, Big 4 | 9/9 personal interviews passed | 95% candidate success

Hi there,

GENERAL PROFITABILITY APPROACH
 

You need to understand the industry + company context from the prompt itself to figure this out...cases and case types cannot be memorized...you have to adjust every single time!

 

Example: LOOKING FIRST at Economy/Industry

 

In my Hot Wheels case, you're a Korean OEM with falling profits. You operate in the US and Japan. The FIRST thing you have to look at here is the general market AND how competitors are doing. Otherwise, you will never learn that US OEMs are doing well in the US while Korean OEMs are NOT doing well in the US. Then, you'll never solve the crux of the case which is that transport times+costs are prohibitively like (Just in Time delivery is the #1 product characteristic).

 

If you don't look at economy/industry first here, you will not solve the case in a time effective manner.

 

https://www.preplounge.com/en/management-consulting-cases/candidate-led-usual-style/intermediate/hot-wheels-186

 

Example NOT looking at Economy/Industry

 

Take my "Chinese Airline During Covid" case example. We know that the airline is in trouble due to covid. We can make the deduction that this is caused by a reduction in demand. As such, we don't really need to look into rest of market/industry

 

So, we want to "repair" existing revenue streams as much as possible. So, first let's see what we can do. Then, whatever "gap" is remaining, we want to fill it with alternative revenue streams. Finally, whatever we can't make up for, we have to fix through cost cutting (ideally cutting unused capacity). See the logic here?

 

And it'll change every time based on the case itself...think critically!

 

https://www.preplounge.com/en/management-consulting-cases/candidate-led-usual-style/intermediate/chinese-chess-airline-business-during-covid-19-191


 


 

GENERAL PROFIT DRIVERS

 

Volume Down: Competition reduced prices or improved their product (outcompeting you), competition just launched effective marketing, regulation has slowed you down, economic decline, environmental disaster, tarrifs, suppliers disrupting your production, your product no longer applies to the customer (i.e. decline has been happening for a while)...and so on and so forth...

 

Price Down: We're in a price war, costs have gone down so we're realising this, regulation has created a price cap, we ran a discount program

 

Variable Costs Up: Raw materials costing more, inefficient contracts, ageing workforce, deteriorating workforce, regulations, quality control

 

Fixed Costs Up: Recent large investments

================================================

REVENUE ISSUES/IMPROVEMENTS
 

Remember, you need to apply your revenue improvement ideas to the specific case at hand. You cannot be generic.

 

That said, some major ways companies boost sales include:

  • SAAS (software as a service)
  • (Relatedly) Subscription revenue
    • Get people onot subscription plans (i.e. Netflix)
  • Behavior-changing "memberships" - i.e. Amazon Prime
    • When people enter Prime membership, they actually actively spend more than they did before
  • Bundling
    • I.e. sell a few things together
  • Radiation
    • Sell products similar to the current one
  • Low-price entry
    • Get someone in with a super cheap/good deal, then, now that you have them as a customer, sell additional, higher-margin products (insurance companies do this, for example)

==================================================

COST ISSUES
 


 

In general, for determining cost issues, you need to break down the problem into a tree/root-cause analysis and ask the highest level (but specific) questions first! In this way, you essentially move down the tree.

 

How do you identify where to look? Well, you need to look into whichever of the following 5 make the most sense based on where you are:

  1. What's the biggest? (i.e. largest piece of the pie...most likely to change the end result)
  2. What's changing the most? (I.e. could be driving the most and most likely to be fixable)
  3. What's the easiest to answer/eliminate? (i.e. quick win. Yes/No type of question that eliminates a lot of other things)
  4. What's the most different? (differences between companies, business units, products, geographies etc....difference = oopportunity)
  5. What's the most likely? (self-explanatory)

 

https://www.preplounge.com/en/consulting-forum/structure-breakdown-for-costs-7963

https://www.preplounge.com/en/consulting-forum/when-should-i-break-down-costs-as-fixed-and-variable-as-opposed-to-over-the-value-chain-5990

 

Major Costs - Areas to Cut

 

FC

  • Rent
  • Labour (salaried employees)
  • Transport (if we own the trucks, etc.)
  • Capex
  • Utilities (for the office, warehouse, etc.)
  • Cbsolescence (wrong word...this is amortization/depreciation)
  • Stolen objects (but shocked you heard this in a case)

VC

  • Labour (hourly employees)
  • Transport (if we pay a company per load)
  • Fuel/truckers (if we own our own trucks etc. for transport)
  • Utilities (if you need more energy to make more widgets)
  • Raw Materials (why wasn't this included? Big one to miss)
20
Coach kontaktieren
0 Kommentare
Antonello
Coach
am 26. Okt. 2021
McKinsey | NASA | top 10 FT MBA professor for consulting interviews | 6+ years of coaching

Hi!

I agree with Sidi and his approach to profitability cases. This methodology will give a direction to your problem-solving and give you an edge over the competition. 

It is crucial that you can deeply analyze a company's revenue streams and therefore I recommend practicing structuring drills and market sizing mainly.

Hope this helps.

Best,

Anto 

9
Coach kontaktieren
0 Kommentare
Cristian
Coach
am 26. Okt. 2023
#1 Rated McKinsey Coach | Top MBB Coach | Verifiable success rates

Lots of great answer below!

As a side exercise, for candidates who want to practice structuring, when receiving a prompt aim to come up with 2-4 alternative structures rather than just one (obviously during practice, not during the interview). 

This exercise will gradually help you build your lateral thinking and your internal library of structure types. 

Like with real client situations, you can always break down a problem in numerous ways. The best consultants are those who can figure out what model enables them to best figure out the problem.

This resource should also help:

  • Expert Guide: Mastering Structuring & Brainstorming


Best,
Cristian

5
Coach kontaktieren
0 Kommentare
Clara
Coach
am 27. Okt. 2021
McKinsey | Awarded professor at Master in Management @ IE | MBA at MIT |+180 students coached | Integrated FIT Guide aut

Hello!

I have a case that focuses very much on profitability, feel free to PM

Cheers, 

Clara

0
Coach kontaktieren
0 Kommentare
Ähnliche Fragen
Consulting
How many mistakes can you make in a case and still be successful?
am 15. Feb. 2023
Global
8
4,5k
Beste Antwort von
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 9+ years consulting, interviewing and coaching experience
52
8 Antworten
4,5k Aufrufe
+5
Consulting
Practice for case interviews while working full time
am 4. Mai 2023
Global
7
2,6k
Beste Antwort von
Francesco
Coach
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success: ➡ interviewoffers.com | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching
26
7 Antworten
2,6k Aufrufe
+4
Consulting
case books
am 15. Nov. 2023
Global
5
5,8k
Beste Antwort von
Ian
Coach
Top US BCG / MBB Coach - 5,000 sessions |Tech, Platinion, Big 4 | 9/9 personal interviews passed | 95% candidate success
162
5 Antworten
5,8k Aufrufe
+2
Beste Antwort von
Sidi
Coach
McKinsey Senior EM & BCG Consultant | Interviewer at McK & BCG for 7 years | Coached 400+ candidates secure MBB offers
Zum Coach-Profil
Verwandter Artikel
Kearney Interview Guide: Sichere dir deinen Traumjob im Consulting
Erfahre alles rund um die Interviews bei der Top-Beratung Kearney!
Zum Artikel
Verwandter Case
Expertencase von
Francesco
BCG Case Style - Online Groceries [NEW]
5,0
10,0k mal gelöst
Fortgeschritten
Candidate-led
Case öffnen
Ähnliche Fragen
Consulting
How many mistakes can you make in a case and still be successful?
am 15. Feb. 2023
52
8
4,5k
Consulting
Practice for case interviews while working full time
am 4. Mai 2023
26
7
2,6k
Consulting
case books
am 15. Nov. 2023
162
5
5,8k
Alles für deine Karriere
  • Interview-Coaching
  • Q&A
  • Interview-Partner
  • Kopfrechen-Tool
  • Interview-Drills
  • Stressfragen-Modus
  • Blog
Alles für deine Karriere
  • Interview-Coaching
  • Q&A
  • Interview-Partner
  • Kopfrechen-Tool
  • Interview-Drills
  • Stressfragen-Modus
  • Blog
Beliebt im Consulting
  • Case-Sammlung
  • Meeting-Board
  • Interview-Partner
  • Case-Interview-Basics
  • Case-Interview
  • Consulting Q&A
Beliebt in Finance
  • Finance Q&A
  • Interview im Investment-Banking
  • Gehälter im Investment Banking
Beliebt im Consulting
  • Case-Sammlung
  • Meeting-Board
  • Interview-Partner
  • Case-Interview-Basics
  • Case-Interview
  • Consulting Q&A
Beliebt in Finance
  • Finance Q&A
  • Interview im Investment-Banking
  • Gehälter im Investment Banking
Arbeitgeber im Consulting und Finance
  • Bain & Company
  • BCG Platinion
  • BearingPoint Deutschland
  • Deloitte
  • DHL Consulting
  • EY
  • EY-Parthenon
  • Forvis Mazars
  • FTI-Andersch AG
  • Inverto, a BCG company
  • Kearney
  • Mercedes-Benz Management Consulting
  • Oliver Wyman
  • Roland Berger
  • RSM Ebner Stolz Management Consultants
  • RWE Consulting
  • Simon-Kucher
  • Stern Stewart & Co.
  • Struktur Management Partner
  • Telekom Strategy Consulting
  • thyssenkrupp Management Consulting
  • zeb Consulting
  • Alle Arbeitgeber »
Über PrepLounge
  • Für Unternehmen
  • Für Hochschulen
  • Für Coaches
  • Über uns
  • Karriere
  • FAQ
© 2012 PrepLounge
Unsere Server werden mit Strom aus erneuerbaren Quellen betrieben.
  • Cookies & Datenschutz
  • AGB
  • Impressum
  • Sitemap
  • Kontakt
Facebook Linkedin Instagram TikTok Youtube
Fragen oder Feedback?
Wähle eine Kategorie
  • Wähle eine Kategorie
  • Allgemeines Feedback
  • Case-Interview-Vorbereitung
  • Coaching
  • Technische Probleme
  • Andere
Dein Name
Deine E-Mail-Adresse
Abbrechen