Werde aktiv in unserer Community aus über 452.000 Gleichgesinnten!

Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Case-Partner, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!

Charts questions

case math
Neue Antwort am 9. März 2023
3 Antworten
457 Views
Anonym A fragte am 2. März 2023

Dear all, 

I always have problems reading charts. Now, I'm trying to make sense of the first chart - exhibit B payment processing breakdown. Would appreciate your help! 

Below is the case prompt. 

Our client is Prospect Equity Partners (‘Prospect’). They have recently acquired Events.com.

Events.comis a leading SaaS-based registration/ticketing platform for Endurance events (5K runs, Marathons, Triathlons, Mud Runs, etc.). They make money by taking registrations and processing payments for events and charging a fee per transaction (similar to Ticketmaster or Eventbrite) ($100 registration price x 10% Fee = $10 in Revenue for Events.com)

•Events.com has doubled market share since 2015, but in the last two years revenue is flat and profits are down, despite growing share. Prospect wants you to determine what is causing this and come up with a plan to improve profitability

Below is my understanding of chart B 

1. I calculated average price per registration for 2017 and 2018 

$339M/8M= $42  and $595M/7.9M=75 

2. Then I calculated average revenue per registration for 2017 and 2018 

$39.9M/8M=$4.9 and $39.9/7.9M= $5 

3. Compare those numbers, conclusion is - we used to make more than 10% per registration on average, now is only 6.7%. so the pricing structure is the roots of this problem. 

4. payment processing expenses increased is due to the increased money we processed- from 339M to 595M. 

Is my interpretation correct? 

 

Übersicht der Antworten

Upvotes
  • Upvotes
  • Datum aufsteigend
  • Datum absteigend
Beste Antwort
Hagen
Experte
Content Creator
bearbeitete eine Antwort am 2. März 2023
#1 Bain coach | >95% success rate | interviewer for 8+ years | mentor and coach for 7+ years

Hi there,

I would be happy to share my thoughts on it:

  • Yes, this is correct.
  • Since the value per registration increased, the company should have stuck to its percentage charging model to equally scale its revenues. However, they changed to a fixed-fee charging model, resulting in decreasing revenues per payment processing and, as such, stagnating revenues.
  • Moreover, since payment processing costs still scale, the contribution margin decreased and, as such, profits decreased.

If you would like a more detailed discussion on how to best prepare for your upcoming interviews, please don't hesitate to contact me directly.

Best,

Hagen

(editiert)

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Francesco
Experte
Content Creator
antwortete am 9. März 2023
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success (➡ interviewoffers.com) | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching

Hi there,

Q: Is my interpretation correct? 

Yes, the interpretation is correct. 

With the analysis you performed with 1 and 2, you can derive that there was a new pricing structure implemented which led to the same revenues as before despite the higher amount of dollars processed. 

Payment processing fees instead still have a positive correlation with the amount of dollars processed, leading to an increase in costs compared to the past and, given revenues are still the same, lower profits.

Best,

Francesco

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Pedro
Experte
antwortete am 2. März 2023
30% off in April 2024 | Bain | EY-Parthenon | Roland Berger | Market Sizing | DARDEN MBA

This is quite strightforward. The company changed its price structure (in practice lowering average fees per transaction). It kept revenue because it has much more transactions, but now has much higher processing costs.

What to do: revise price structure…

War diese Antwort hilfreich?

Hagen

CoachingPlus-Experten
Premium + Coaching-Experten
Content Creator
#1 Bain coach | >95% success rate | interviewer for 8+ years | mentor and coach for 7+ years
489
Meetings
15.750
Q&A Upvotes
88
Awards
5,0
415 Bewertungen