Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Interview-Partner:innen, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!
Zurück zur Übersicht

Accuracy of sick people calculation

I really enjoyed this case. However, I did get the sick patient market sizing fairly incorrect. I understand that the market sizing is more about how you formulate your answer than the exact answer. However, I think some of the key assumptions, in this case, are quite far off. Particularly the cancer numbers. 

A chance of developing cancer of 2% in a 75-year lifespan is exceptionally low. The real figure would be much closer to 20-25%, and this is in keeping with China's current prevalence of approximately 1.5%. I think because of this inaccuracy and the fact that the numbers of diabetes patients are calculated off of this, these are also quite far off a more realistic number. 

I calculated the sick patient numbers as much higher. 

I'd be interesting to know if anybody thinks differently about this? My calculation for pregnant women was fairly accurate, but my sick patient calculation was significantly different. 

2
1,5k
10
Schreibe die erste Antwort!
Bisher hat niemand auf diese Frage reagiert.
Beste Antwort
Clara
Coach
am 21. Apr. 2021
McKinsey | Awarded professor at Master in Management @ IE | MBA at MIT |+180 students coached | Integrated FIT Guide aut

Hello!

Glad you lieked the case, indeed there are many great ones here in the library. 

Furthermore, as you very well state, the important thing are not the assumptions -that you can always double check with the interviewer also-, but the way you think and structure the problem. 

This said, I agree with you, 2% figure is too low -and a simple Google research would demostrate that-. I am not if your 30% is a bit high (I also hope so, for the good of mankind), hehe. The right way to approach this would be to just ask something like: 

"I would assume that 20-25% is the estimated chance for a person to get cancer in a lifetyme, does the client have any information regarding that figure to double check my assumption?"

Hope it helps!

Cheers, 

Clara

Ian
Coach
am 21. Apr. 2021
Top US BCG / MBB Coach - 5,000 sessions |Tech, Platinion, Big 4 | 9/9 personal interviews passed | 95% candidate success

Hi Matthew,

I think your question here is great - you're levelheaded about this.

Yes, the thinking/structure matter the most.

But, having reasonable assumptions matters a lot as well! Now, clearly you know a fair bit about this topic, and you are correct (around 20-50% of people get cancer in their lifetime). Be reassured that you are right here!

Ähnliche Fragen
Consulting
Just did the Mckinsey Solve Game (January 2025) - got some questions/insights
am 24. Apr. 2025
Global
5
3,2k
Beste Antwort von
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience
35
5 Antworten
3,2k Aufrufe
+2
Consulting
Employment Gap on Resume and How to talk about it during Interview
am 14. Apr. 2025
Global
9
7,8k
Beste Antwort von
Ariadna
Coach
BCG | Project Leader and Experienced Interviewer | MBA at London Business School
110
9 Antworten
7,8k Aufrufe
+6
Consulting
How should I explain a change in course at university? Will it be asked of me?
am 14. Apr. 2025
Global
10
3,4k
Beste Antwort von
Alessa
Coach
xMcKinsey & Company | xBCG | +200 individual & group coachings | feel free to schedule a 15 min intro call for free
81
10 Antworten
3,4k Aufrufe
+7
Wie wahrscheinlich ist es, dass du uns einem Freund oder Kommilitonen empfiehlst?
0 = Nicht wahrscheinlich
10 = Sehr wahrscheinlich
Vielen Dank für dein Feedback! Deine Meinung hilft uns, PrepLounge noch besser zu machen.