Werde aktiv in unserer Community aus über 452.000 Gleichgesinnten!

Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Case-Partner, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!

Plug and play type McK math question

business concepts
Neue Antwort am 30. Nov. 2021
3 Antworten
1,0 T. Views
Anonym A fragte am 7. Okt. 2021
-1633571997-d7mw8rrhq4hi.png

1) What combination of lines would you pick for each scenario (new factory) vs (expansion) to produce 240K tons and minimize cost. 2) Based on these combinations, which option (new factory vs expansion) would you recommend?

Example Answer for part 1) 2 lines of type 1 and 1 line of type 2 (cost 110M, production ~252K)

Is there a better way to solve such plug and play type questions instead of trying different combinations of 3 lines, 2 lines, 1 line 0 line of each type ..and finding cost / production for each combination? This is still doable for part 1) for the (new) facility since there's a 3 line limit  but for (expansion), since any combination of lines are possible, how do you not waste time trying different combinations?

 How to approach such plug and play problems in general to save time?

Übersicht der Antworten

Upvotes
  • Upvotes
  • Datum aufsteigend
  • Datum absteigend
Beste Antwort
Pedro
Experte
antwortete am 7. Okt. 2021
Bain | Roland Berger | EY-Parthenon | Mentoring Approach | 30% off first 10 sessions in May| Market Sizing | DARDEN MBA

You don't have to try every possible combination. You have to order the options from most effective to least effective from a cost per unit perspective and then do as much of the best as you can, then of the 2nd one, and so on, until you reach the desired capacity. If you have excess capacity, then you compare with the closest alternatives of using more of the lower priority factory (until going to a lower priority does not yiled a better result).

In this case you would have:

  • Option 1: 3 Type 1 ($130M investment, 299k). A lot of excess capacity.

Then you compare with the closest options as you have spare capacity:

  • Option 2: 2 T1 and 1 T2 is better ($110M investment, 259k*). 
  • Option 3: 1 T1 an 2 T2 doesn't work.
  • Option 4: 2 T1 and 1 T3 also doesn't work, so no need to go further.

Option 2 it is!

*I believe you incorrectly calculated this number (8.3*12*2+5*12=259.2)

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Ian
Experte
Content Creator
antwortete am 7. Okt. 2021
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate

Hi there,

Pedro gave a great answer, so no need to repeat the answer here.

Just remember, for all math questions you get think realyl critically about “what am I trying to solve for”.

Take that 30 seconds to really think through what you need, have, and don't have. Take time to setup a structure that works in your favor to simplify the problem.

The more you can make math simple, the less time you waste and the fewer mistakes you'll make from brute force attempts!

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Marco-Alexander
Experte
Content Creator
bearbeitete eine Antwort am 30. Nov. 2021
Former BCG | Case author for efellows book | Experience in 6 consultancies (Stern Stewart, Capgemini, KPMG, VW Con., Hor

(editiert)

War diese Antwort hilfreich?

Pedro

CoachingPlus-Experten
Premium + Coaching-Experten
Bain | Roland Berger | EY-Parthenon | Mentoring Approach | 30% off first 10 sessions in May| Market Sizing | DARDEN MBA
136
Meetings
16.757
Q&A Upvotes
57
Awards
5,0
21 Bewertungen