Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Interview-Partner:innen, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!
Zurück zur Übersicht

How to communicate the "mix factor" in a profitability case clearly?

Hi all,

I'd like to seek your thoughts on how to communicate the “mix” factor in a profitability case.

For instance, we want to improve the profit margin of a supermarket.

In my first analysis bucket, I want to understand the numerical drivers. Which option sounds clearer to you?

  1. Option one: I want to look into three areas - revenue, cost, and mix (e.g., product mix, customer mix, store type mix).
  2. Option two: I would start by understanding how to segment. One hypothesis could be that low-margin segments are growing. Possible segmentation approaches could include A, B, and C. Then, I would examine the financials, looking into revenue first, then cost.

Both options don't seem entirely “MECE” to me, but if I only split profit into revenue and cost, we miss out on the “mix” factor. Please share your advice!

3
800+
30
Schreibe die erste Antwort!
Bisher hat niemand auf diese Frage reagiert.
Beste Antwort
Alberto
Coach
am 13. Juli 2024
Ex-McKinsey (5yrs) and Wharton MBA (GMAT 750) | Free intro call and dedicated preparation material

Hi! The second option is better.

Often large companies have separate divisions which have their own P&L and focus on relatively different businesses. So, the first step would be to ask whether you have multiple divisions and, if this is the case, apply your profitability structure to each division separately and then comment on the combined.

You can also have revenue segmentations within a division (by product, by client as you mentioned). In this case the mix will likely affect only the gross profit (since fixed costs will likely be shared). So, here the approach would be identifying the revenue segmentation first, assessing the gross profit of each segmentation, assessing the mix effect, and then taking into consideration also fixed costs.

I hope this helps!

Pedro
Coach
am 9. Aug. 2024
Bain | EY-Parthenon | Former Principal | 1.5h session | 30% discount 1st session

Option 2, exactly. First you segment, then you deep dive on each segment, not the opposite.

Hagen
Coach
am 30. Sept. 2024
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience

Hi there,

I would be happy to share my thoughts on your question:

  • First of all, none of the options make sense for one simple reason: "mix" is not a numerical driver, but a potential root cause of the numerical driver(s) looking the way they do.
  • Moreover, what would be the next step in your analysis once you have identified the numerical driver(s)?

If you would like a more detailed discussion on how to best prepare for your upcoming interviews, please don't hesitate to contact me directly.

Best,

Hagen

Ähnliche Fragen
Consulting
How strictly should I commit to being objective orientated?
am 26. Apr. 2025
Global
7
300+
Beste Antwort von
Daniel
Coach
Ex-McKinsey, Bain & Kearney | 5+ yrs consulting, coaching & interviewing | 95%+ candidate success
16
7 Antworten
300+ Aufrufe
+4
Consulting
Framework for Increasing Profits?
am 18. Apr. 2025
Global
6
200+
Beste Antwort von
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience
11
6 Antworten
200+ Aufrufe
+3
Consulting
Essential ideas for brainstorming?
am 1. Feb. 2025
Global
7
500+
Beste Antwort von
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience
18
7 Antworten
500+ Aufrufe
+4
Wie wahrscheinlich ist es, dass du uns einem Freund oder Kommilitonen empfiehlst?
0 = Nicht wahrscheinlich
10 = Sehr wahrscheinlich
Vielen Dank für dein Feedback! Deine Meinung hilft uns, PrepLounge noch besser zu machen.