How reflective are screening tests of a career in consulting?

Hey there,

It’s difficult to say to what extent solving problem-solving tests like the McKinsey Solve test correlates with performance on the job or long-term career success. Even within McKinsey, opinions on this differ depending on geography and office culture. Some offices don’t use these tests at all, which shows that there’s no universal agreement on their importance.

These tests are designed to simulate and evaluate your ability to problem-solve and think critically under time pressure, which is a skill you’ll regularly need in consulting. However, the job itself involves much more than this. Strategic thinking, client management, teamwork, and communication are just as critical, if not more so, and these tests don’t measure those skills.

If I were in your position, I’d focus on two things:

1. Continue practicing and understanding the logic of such tests – McKinsey problem solving test has its own unique format, different from SHL tests or GMAT, and its logic can be trained. Analyse available practice tests, use resources tailored to such tests, and consider getting support from PrepLounge coaches.
2. Expand your scope beyond McKinsey – Don’t restrict yourself to one firm. Practice other firms' tests, like BCG’s, which are similar in some regions, and apply to other consulting firms. Many firms offer great opportunities and could align well with your skills and goals.

Finally, remember that these tests are primarily a way for firms to efficiently sift through applications, not a perfect predictor of consulting success. Keep preparing, diversify your applications, and stay focused on your goal. Good luck!

Hi there!

Also consider that often, such tests are conceived to reduce number of candidates to be intwrviews depending on the hiring season/ ciclciality the company is in, by simply highering the bar.  

This is just for saying, don't get discouraged and keep practicing on those skills and try apply to other companies!

It doesn't work like that. Screening tests are trying to figure out who has a higher chance of passing an interview, instead of who has a higher chance of being great at the job. 

If you have a obvious weakness in math you are less likely to pass the interview, and they use it to make sure they don't interview 00's of people who have a low chance of success in an interview.

Hi there,

The job is totally different than the Solve Game (using your example) or any other recruitment test for that matter, yet Imbellus (the firm which created the test) studied the correlation with interview performance which apparently is significant.

I am not a big fan of these tests either, but they are inevitable nuisance if you want to make it past the screening stage. :-(

Cheers,

Florian 

First, tests are used as a tool to automatically filter candidates, rejecting approximately 80–90% of applicants.

Second, if you join at an entry level, be prepared for significant number crunching in addition to strategic work. Strategy relies heavily on analysis, which is often numerical.

Best,

Alberto

Hey there, 

Screening tests are intended to identify suitable candidates to move into interviewing rounds and not necessarily to depict how well you'd do on the job. 

Think of it this way... everyone that works at a consulting firm would have passed the screening, but not everyone would have done well nor had the same outcomes in their career.

All the best