Werde aktiv in unserer Community aus über 400.000 Gleichgesinnten!

Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Case-Partner, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!

Case: Road Construction in New York

Case Market sizing
Letzte Aktivität am 17. März 2018
1 Antwort
2,3 T. Views
Anonym A fragte am 17. März 2018

Hi there,

I came across a very interesting but challenging case on road construction in New York. Since I don't know the official solution, it would be great if you can comment on my approach.

Our client is a construction company in the USA. The city wants to rebuild all streets in New York and asked our client about the total cost of such a plan.

To me, this is a traditional market sizing case for which we can use an issue tree.

To calculate the total cost of the plan, I thought of 3 different branches: road surface (in m^3), variable cost (per m^3) and fixed cost.

Branch 1: Road Surface
For simplicity we can think of New York as a rectangle. Since we don't know the ratio of road surface to the total NY surface (interviewer information), we need to dive a little deeper: since we we deal with a block scheme in the city, we can assume that we have streets that run from the North to the South and streets that run from the West to East. Since there are houses, parks etc. between the streets, we would have to calculate the number of streets in each direction. Once we have this number, we could calculate the road surface as follows:
(a) Number of North-South Streets * Length of the City * Width of the Street (PLUS)
(b) Number of West-East Streets * Width of the City * Width of the Street (MINUS)
(c) Road surface of crossings (we counted them twice). How would you do that?

Branch 2: Variable Cost
Now that we have the road surface, we need to multiply it with the associated variable costs, such as:
(a) Material
(b) Labor
The resulting figure would give us the total variable cost for the construction.

Branch 3: Fixed Cost
In a last step we would have to add the fixed cost for the road construction such as:
(a) Equipment
(b) Road closures
(c) Other overhead

1) Do you think this approach is reasonable?
2) How would you calculate the number of North-South streets and West-East streets? Which assumptions would you make?
3) How would you calcuate the road surface of crossings to avoid double counting?

Thanks a million!

Übersicht der Antworten

  • Upvotes
  • Datum aufsteigend
  • Datum absteigend
Beste Antwort
antwortete am 17. März 2018
McKinsey / Accenture Alum / Got all BIG3 offers / Harvard Business School


1) Sounds like a good approach

2) It's easy for Manhattan and other areas since there is a fixed number of streets with numbers. Alternatively, you may calculate the size of each block and the number of blocks. For that, you can benchmark the area of New York to the area of some cities you know

3) You simply calculate the total number and area of crossings and subtract them once to reduce the double count

Most important:

The total cost of such project is not only the total cost to build the roads. Depending on who is the owner of the project and for whom you are calculating the costs, you will have a lot of additional costs related to:

  • Construction permissions
  • Lost revenue of retail stores in these areas and potential reimbursements
  • The additional cost to the cities due to the traffic jams (More labor / trains needed in the subway, additional busses etc.)
  • Etc.

When you have the cases like this, always try understand the broader picture


War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Wie wahrscheinlich ist es, dass du uns einem Freund oder Kommilitonen empfiehlst?
0 = Nicht wahrscheinlich
10 = Sehr wahrscheinlich