Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Interview-Partner:innen, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!
Zurück zur Übersicht
Anonym A
am 14. Sept. 2023
Global
Frage zu

Accounting for drivers that drive evening peak hours on Friday (weekday)

I want to ask a question about accounting for total rides that each rider drives in this case. 

TLDR: Why are drivers assumed to only be taking morning peak hour rides when there's an imbalance between evening rush hour hours between Mon-Thu and Fri?

We are given full details of the itinierary of the drivers in question and are told that they can only drive one of the rush-hours (peak hours) of either morning OR evening between Monday to Saturday. 

Note here that the peak evening hours from Monday - Thursday are 3 hours long while those for Friday and Saturday are 4 hours long (to account for an extra hour of night activities). Morning rush hours are only restricted to weekdays, as per the case text. 

The question then asks us to estimate the total hours that a rider drives: this makes sense as multiplying this value by the ride cost (constant) would give us the total revenue generated by 1 driver. 

However, the case solution states that it is “assuming our driver benefits from morning rush hour" such that the evening rush hour on the Friday is not accounted for, losing 1 hour of added revenue there. 

This justification makes no sense to me. There are evidently going to be drivers who choose to make 1 hours' worth of extra revenue to opt for Friday evening rush hours (3 hours on Mon-Thu vs 4 hours on Fri). I understand that between Mondays to Thursdays, the choice of morning or evening rush hour is irrelevant as the hours are the same and the revenue per ride is unchanged. 

Of course, this does (ultimately) have a huge effect on the answer of the total rides completed by a driver as this will vary based on the election of an evening Friday rush-hour slot or a morning Friday rush-hour slot. 

The commentary doesn't provide any justification for this and purely uses these assumptions to solve the case, failing to capture the alternative market of drivers who drive on Friday evenings.

Why does the case commentary make this assumption? Is there a justification for this that I've missed in this case or is my point valid and (potentially) highlights a flaw in the case? 

Going by the answer in exhibit 1, the case assumes that Friday evening is also a weekend (as it specifies 2 days worked in peak weekend AND we know that Sunday does not have peak hours), but this is not properly specified. 

1
900+
22
Schreibe die erste Antwort!
Bisher hat niemand auf diese Frage reagiert.
PrepLounge
am 20. Dez. 2024

Hello, 

We have probably noticed your question a bit too late as you are most likely already a successful consultant. You definitely bring the right analytical skills to the table. ?

Your obeservations are correct and either calculation would be fine as long as the underlying assumptions are transparently communicated to the interviewer. To make sure that candidates can get the correct result when working the case on their own, we have added a note that one should assume that morning shifts are preferred. 

We hope that helps and wish you much success for the future! ?

0
Ähnliche Fragen
Consulting
Frage zu
Definition of weekend
am 19. Okt. 2020
Global
1
2,0k
Beste Antwort von
Ian
Coach
Top US BCG / MBB Coach - 5,000 sessions |Tech, Platinion, Big 4 | 9/9 personal interviews passed | 95% candidate success
18
1 Antwort
2,0k Aufrufe