Is table 1 mistakenly or deliberately missing information? The car density for Germany is missing in the table. Is it because the candidate is meant to ask for that data? Additionally it misses the units to the car density and annual lubricant consumption. Is the candidate supposed to know that the car density would be the no. of cars per inhabitant and annual lubricant conumption would be in kg/year or is the candidate supposed to ask the interviewer for these details?
Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Interview-Partner:innen, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!
Zurück zur Übersicht
12
20
20
Schreibe die erste Antwort!
Bisher hat niemand auf diese Frage reagiert.
Hello there,
Looking at the case, it does seems that the car density data for Germany is intentionally left out as it is designed to test market sizing capability of the prospective candidate.
This is a very common part of every case interviews. Most of the time, when we inquire to the interviewer on a specific data, they might say that the data is not available and expect us to estimate a number based on logical approximation.
The best course when facing such situation in real interview is to ask if the data is available, and if not, mentioned that since it is crucial to have the data to assess the attractiveness of the market, you will conduct a market sizing estimation.
On your second question, clarifying on unit details and any other unclear information is a common practice within a consultant's work. It is expected out of every candidates to inquire on such items during case interviews. Rest asssured that such actions will never be held against you.
Hope it helps.
Kind regards,
Nathan
Ähnliche Fragen
Consulting
Difference between PrepLounge and Case Coach Cases?
am 14. Mai 2025
Global
5
200+
5 Antworten
200+ Aufrufe
+2
Consulting
Bain Answer First and Chart Reading Approach
am 25. März 2025
Global
7
500+
7 Antworten
500+ Aufrufe
+4
Consulting
Cases in junior vs senior hiring
am 26. Apr. 2025
Global
11
400+
11 Antworten
400+ Aufrufe
+8
What I read:
- Turkey and Russia have high market growth in general and growth for premium motor vehicles, Germany not
- Turkey has higher car density as Russia, and for Germany there is no data
What I know / researched:
Population of Germany: 84m
Population of Turkey: 86m
Population of Russia: 144m
I would conclude that:
- Russia should has the biggest market due to pure size of country
- Then Turkey, and finally
- Germany is the looser as they are not mentioned as high growth and are the smallest in terms of population
And alternative, I could accept would be, that
That Turkey is first, then Russia, as the car density is higher
The solution says that: Turkey is the loser and therefore has the smallest market size, then comes Germany and russia is the winner
But I can not find any data that would bring me to the conclusion that Germany is not the worst in terms of sheer market size
Could anyone explain to me?
Since we are talking about the size of the lubricant market, it would not be correct to simply compare the size of the population.
The size of the lubricant market should be calculated as the number of cars in one country x the amount of lubricant used for a car.
the number of cars can be calculated as density/1000 x population.
I personally think it would be helpful to clarify the meaning of density as I assumed it to be the number of cars/km2, which definitely complicated my calculations. Maybe it's just me.