Werde aktiv in unserer Community aus über 457.000 Gleichgesinnten!

Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Case-Partner, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!

Estimate compounding

Oliver Wyman case: Setting up a Wine Cellar
Neue Antwort am 28. Aug. 2023
4 Antworten
11,0 T. Views
Anonym A fragte am 27. Sept. 2019


In one part of the interview, this is a solution:

The interviewee should be able to estimate the fact that $100*(1 + 20%)^5 is something like $250 off the cuff. Without compounding, it’s obviously $200 exactly, so the answer “something a bit more than $200” is good. Many people answer $200 exactly and, when prompted “is it more or less than $200” choose “less”, which is clearly madness.

Three questions:

1) How should I be able to estimate that this is 250$?

2) If I estimate in that the worth in 5 years will be 100$ + 5*20%(100$), how should I know if it the number should be higher or lower than 200$?

3) In this case, would you do the whole math or simplify it?

Übersicht der Antworten

  • Upvotes
  • Datum aufsteigend
  • Datum absteigend
Beste Antwort
Content Creator
antwortete am 1. Okt. 2019
McKinsey | NASA | top 10 FT MBA professor for consulting interviews | 6+ years of coaching

As quick answer, of course, is great "something a bit more than $200, we can assume $250" (you can say here $240, $230 or anything higher than 200 but lower than 300, use common sense).

No interviewer will ever ask you the exact number, but with a few seconds more you can really crack it. The most relevant addends in the whole compound interest formula (1+p)^n are the first three:

  • 1
  • n*p
  • n*(n-1)/2 * p^2

Therefore in our problem we have: 1 + 5*0.2 + 5*4/2 * 0.2^2 = 1 + 1 + 0.4 = 2.4 -> $240

After a little practice, you will find this formula very easy and immediate, but you will impress every interviewer you are going to face with.

Try it in similar problems and let me know :)



War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Amandine am 12. Nov. 2019

Hi Antonello, does this formula work for any number of years and growth percentage ? Thanks a lot.

Antonello am 12. Nov. 2019

Hi Amandine, yes it is the best quick approximation for any number. The more little are the numbers the more accurate is this formula.

David am 29. Nov. 2019

Hi Antonello, can you please clarify again how you got the three terms that you use to approximate (1 + 20%)^5? Just tell me how you calculate the first one for example


Antonello am 9. Dez. 2019

Hi David, it's a classical Math formula. You can find here the theorem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem

R (Mck Final round) am 2. Jan. 2020

Good use of Binomial Theorem

Content Creator
antwortete am 26. Nov. 2022
Limited Availability | BCG Expert | Middle East Expert | 100+ Mocks Delivered | IESE & NYU MBA | Ex-KPMG Dxb Consultant


Here's an easy way to look at this:

Assuming simple interest: Assuming simple interest of 20% for 5 years, that's $100 * 20% = $20 per year => $100 for 5 years

This will be $100+$100 = $200.

Adding the extra bit for compounding: 

20% of 20 is 4. Doing that for 4 years is $16 - lets call this A

Doing that for 3 years is $12 - B

Doing that for 2 years is $8 - C

Doing that for 1 year is $4 - D

Now, A + B + C + D = $40

This gives you a ‘simple interest estimate for compounding’ at $40. Thus with true compounding, the answer would be a little over $240.

War diese Antwort hilfreich?
antwortete am 28. Aug. 2023
BCG 1st & Final Round interviewer | Personalized prep with >95% success rate | 7yrs coaching | #1 for Experienced Hires

Adding some thoughts..

1. Try using Rule of 72 as a proxy for CAGR numbers - see how long it takes to double a number and then add / subtract 1-2 years from there.

2. You can just take linear growth and then adjust from there. You know it must be higher, if linear growth already gets you to 200. Compounding effect is stronger, so it can't be less than the 200.

3. For simple examples with “pleasant” growth rates like 10%, 20% or 50% and a relatively short timeframe, can just quickly do it manually. Here what it would look like is: 1) 100 x 1.2 = 120 x 1.2 = 144 x 1.20 = 173 x 1.2 = 207 x 1.2 = 248 → adding 20% increments should be fairly quick 


War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Anonym C bearbeitete die Antwort am 18. Feb. 2022

what I don't get is the consumption. why is he drinking just 72 bottles a year after year 5? initially he said 8 bottles to drink and 2 as a gift = 10 bottles a month = 120 bottles consumption a year. but if he buys only 72 a year and consumes 120 the graph should fall….. where do I have a thinking gap?


War diese Antwort hilfreich?
Anonym D am 28. Feb. 2022

Hi - here is my understanding of the case. In the "drinking section" - he buys 120 a year and consumes 120 a year, so the net impact is 0. In the "investment section" - he buys 72 a year and sell whatever has appreciated over 5 years. Except for Year 6 when he sells 192 (120 during kickstart + 72 during Year 1), in subsequent years he sells 72 per year. Hope that helps!

Antonello gab die beste Antwort


Premium + Coaching-Experten
Content Creator
McKinsey | NASA | top 10 FT MBA professor for consulting interviews | 6+ years of coaching
Q&A Upvotes
108 Bewertungen
Wie wahrscheinlich ist es, dass du uns einem Freund oder Kommilitonen empfiehlst?
0 = Nicht wahrscheinlich
10 = Sehr wahrscheinlich
Danke fürs Beraten! Mit deiner Hilfe können wir PrepLounge verbessern!