Audit Memo

Audit & Assurance
New answer on Mar 16, 2022
1 Answer
123 Views
Anonymous A asked on Mar 15, 2022

Hi there, does anyone have a sample answer to this question? Would appreciate any help.

CarProof Corp. (CarProof). CarProof is a public company founded in 2000 to manufacture and sell specialty auto products mainly relating to paint protection and rustproofing. By 2009, the CarProof board of directors felt that the company products had fully matured and that it needed to diversify. CarProof aggressively sought out new products, and in March 2010 it acquired the formula and patent for a specialized motor lubricant (Run-Smooth) from SIM, LLC. In addition, the company purchased 15 percent of SIM's outstanding common stock. At the time of the stock purchase, Steve Matthews owned 100 percent of SIM; he retained ownership of 85 percent of SIM after CarProof 15 percent purchase. In December 2010, the board of directors appointed Mr. Matthews to be president of CarProof.

Run-Smooth is unlike conventional motor lubricants. Its innovative molecular structure accounts for what management believes is its superior performance. Although it is more expensive to produce and has a higher selling price than its conventional competitors, management believes that it will reduce maintenance costs and extend the life of equipment in which it is used.

CarProof's main competitor is a very successful multinational conglomerate that has excellent customer recognition of its products and a large distribution network. To create a market niche for Run-Smooth, CarProof's management is targeting commercial businesses in western states that service vehicle fleets and industrial equipment.

CarProof's existing facilities were not adequate to produce Run-Smooth in commercial quantities. In June 2011 CarProof commenced construction of a new plant in Nevada. After lengthy negotiation, it received a $900,000 grant from the state government. The terms of the grant require CarProof to maintain certain employment levels in Nevada over the next three years or the grant must be repaid. The new facilities become operational on December 1, 2011. CarProof financed its recent expansion with a term bank loan. Management is considering issuing additional stock later in 2012 to address the company's cash flow problems.

CarProof auditors resigned in February 2012, after which Steve Matthews contacted your firm. The previous auditors informed Mr. Matthews that they disagreed with CarProof's valuation of deferred development costs for Run-Smooth.

It is now April 20, 2012, and you and a partner in your firm have just met with Steve Matthews to discuss the services your firm can provide to CarProof for the year ending March 31, 2012. During meeting, you collected the following information:

CarProof incurred substantial losses during each of the past three fiscal years.

There have been no significant orders of Run-Smooth received to date.

CarProof has commenced a lawsuit against a major competitor for patent infringement and industrial espionage. Management has evidence that it believes will result in a successful action, and wishes to record the estimated gain on settlement of $4 million. Although no court date has been set, legal correspondence shows that the competitor intends to fight this action to the highest court in the land.

Deferred development costs of $2 million represent material, labor, and subcontract costs incurred during 2010 and 2011 to evaluate me Run-Smooth product and prepare it for market. CarProof has no taken any amortization to date but thinks that a period of 20 years would be appropriate.

Royalties of $0.25 per liter of Run-Smooth produced are to be pain annually to SIM.

The $3,514 million term bank loan is secured by a floating charge over all corporate assets. The loan agreement requires CarProof to undergo an annual environmental assessment of its old and new binding facilities.

As you return to the office, the partner tells you that he is interested in having CarProof as an audit client. She wants a memo from you covering in detail the audit and business risks you foresee arising from this potential engagement.

Prepare the memo requested by the audit partner.

Overview of answers

Upvotes
  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Best answer
Ian
Expert
Content Creator
replied on Mar 16, 2022
MBB | 100% personal interview success rate (8/8) and 95% candidate success rate | Personalized interview prep

Hi there,

I'm sorry, but it's highly unlikely that you're going to get an answer to this here.

This is a full written case/take home assignment!

Feel free to reach out if you'd like coaching support here.

Was this answer helpful?
Ian gave the best answer

Ian

Content Creator
MBB | 100% personal interview success rate (8/8) and 95% candidate success rate | Personalized interview prep
672
Meetings
48,977
Q&A Upvotes
133
Awards
4.9
91 Reviews