Two things come up when discusing the difference between McK and BCG. However, I do not hear a consistent view and would like to know the view of the experts.
1. One firm is supposed to have a better internal culture that is more collaborative. However, many also mention that this difference is over-rated as both firms are very similar and hire similar people to do similar kind of work. Which of these two versions sound right?
2. Some argue one firm is more reputed than other and therefore offers better experience nd better exit opportunities; whereas others would say that there is no difference between both firms and both offer great exit optons. Which one do you agree with?