MBB - Taxis in Manhattan | PrepLounge.com

Lerne die Basics für das Case-Interview, übe mit 200+ Cases und profitiere von umfangreichen Testmaterialien und interaktiven Self-Study-Tools.

Expertencase von Ian

5,7k

mal gelöst

3,5

< 100 Bewertungen

Fortgeschritten

Schwierigkeitsgrad

Case-Frage

An entrepreneur has come to you looking to disrupt the taxi industry in NYC. They are interested in determining the number of taxis in Manhattan, in order to understand how large their fleet would need to be to compete. How would you go about determining how many taxis exist in Manhattan?

If the candidate asks, you may clarify the following:

This is pre ride-hailing technology
That we are looking for total taxis NOT taxis at any given time. We would like an estimate of the size of the fleet
Manhattan is 1 of 5 boroughs in NYC

Case-Kommentare

Kommentare für diesen Case einblenden Kommentare für diesen Case ausblenden

Scoring Criteria: Use the following grading system for each skill area:

a. Structured Thinking (Frameworking):

1 = Lacked a coherent structure

5 = Pinpointed the appropriate issue, segmented it into a complete set of non-overlapping components (e.g., MECE), presented a plan to tackle the case, and offered valuable insights.

b. Numeracy/Math:

1 = Committed numerous errors and required assistance in setting up equations

5 = Performed calculations accurately and with confidence, identified implications, designed a clear and efficient approach, and demonstrated exceptional speed.

c. Judgement and Insights (Charts & Exhibits): 1 = Missed basic insights 5 = Connected findings to develop practical recommendations, made reasonable hypotheses, shared impressive insights, and flagged far-reaching implications.
1 = Overlooked fundamental insights

5 = Linked observations to devise actionable recommendations, formulated plausible hypotheses, conveyed strong, objective-driven insights, and highlighted impact.

d. Case Leadership (unless interviewer-led):

1 = Frequently disoriented and dependent on guidance

5 = Advanced autonomously and maintained focus on the question and the client's objective.

e. Creativity:

1 = Had difficulty generating original ideas

5 = Offered a variety of strong and diverse ideas, tailored to the industry and business context.

f. Presence:

1 = Not client-ready

5 = Exhibited professionalism, charisma, enthusiasm, and self-assurance.

g. Communication:

1 = Unclear and disorganized

5 = Demonstrated active listening, spoke precisely, and communicated concisely.

h. Synthesis (Final Recommendation):

1 = Failed to provide a coherent and well-founded recommendation

5 = Justified recommendation with key considerations, potential risks, and subsequent steps to address those risks.

During the Interview: As the candidate progresses through the case, take notes on their performance in each skill area. Be prepared to provide feedback at the end of the interview.

Post-Interview: After the interview, grade the candidate's performance in each skill area based on your notes and the scoring criteria. Share the scores and any specific feedback with the candidate to help them understand their level of readiness for the actual interview.

Improvement: Encourage the candidate to focus on areas where their performance was weak and provide guidance on how they can improve in those areas.