Consulting Consulting
Consulting Finance General
Login Sign up for free Sign up for free
Consulting Finance General
Community
Meeting Board
Consulting Q&A
Interview Partner
Premium Membership
Coaching
Coaches
Coaching Packages
Consulting Q&A
Resources
Case Interview Basics
Case Library
AI Casebot
Tests & Guides
Mental Math Tool
Stress Questions
Drills
Video Tutorials
Brainteaser
Career
Employers
Career Events
Consulting Jobs
Consulting Blog
Sign up for free
Login
Community
Meeting Board
Consulting Q&A
Interview Partner
Premium Membership
Coaching
Coaches
Coaching Packages
Consulting Q&A
Resources
Case Interview Basics
Case Library
AI Casebot
Tests & Guides
Mental Math Tool
Stress Questions
Drills
Video Tutorials
Brainteaser
Career
Employers
Career Events
Consulting Jobs
Consulting Blog
Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Meeting Board
Consulting Q&A
Interview Partner
Premium Membership
Back to overview
Anonymous A
on Nov 01, 2023
Global
I want to receive updates regarding this question via email.

Top Down vs Bottom Up (Estimations)

Why might someone prefer the top-down method for market sizing over the bottom-up approach? From what I gather, the top-down method involves using a larger data set and applying a percentage to determine a specific market size, like estimating the number of smartphone users in a city based on the city's population and the national smartphone penetration rate. In contrast, the bottom-up method seems to be more detailed, as it would involve estimating the number of smartphone sales per store in that city and then multiplying by the number of stores. Could you provide another example where the top-down approach might be advantageous compared to the bottom-up method?

7
3.1k
56
Write an answer
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Sidi
Coach
edited on Aug 20, 2024
McKinsey Senior EM & BCG Consultant | Interviewer at McK & BCG for 7 years | Coached 400+ candidates secure MBB offers

Hello!

The top-down method for market sizing is typically quicker and provides a general estimate promptly. However, it's often not as precise as the bottom-up approach. 

In a real consultancy setting, the top-down method is mainly useful in two scenarios:

  1. When there's insufficient data for a bottom-up analysis or when the variables involved are too intricate and time-consuming to consolidate effectively.
  2. When the top-down estimate serves as a cross-check for the results derived from the bottom-up method, a technique known as triangulation.

Hope this helps! Sidi

___________________

Dr. Sidi S. Koné

Former Senior Engagement Manager & Interviewer at McKinsey | Former Senior Consultant at BCG | Co-Founder of The MBB Offer Machine™

16
Contact coach
0 comments
Hagen
Coach
on May 31, 2024
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience

Hi there,

I would be happy to share my thoughts on your question:

  • First of all, top-down market size estimations are typically quicker to perform because they require fewer data points to arrive at a conclusion. This can be particularly beneficial when time is a constraint or when an immediate ballpark figure is necessary for a strategic decision.
  • Moreover, the top-down method can be more effective when data on smaller segments is unavailable or unreliable. For instance, if you are trying to estimate the market size for electric vehicles in a country where the industry is just emerging, and there's limited data on sales per dealership.
  • Lastly, I would advise you to use the top-down approach when the market dynamics are influenced by macro-level factors more than micro-level factors. For example, estimating the demand for residential solar panels can be more accurately done by looking at overarching trends in green energy adoption and government incentives, rather than starting with individual sales figures which might not be readily available.

If you would like a more detailed discussion on how to best prepare for your upcoming interviews, please don't hesitate to contact me directly.

Best,

Hagen

13
Contact coach
0 comments
Moritz
Coach
edited on Nov 02, 2023
ex-McKinsey EM & Interviewer | 7/8 offer rate for 4+ sessions | High impact sessions + FREE materials & exercises

Hi there,

In my view, top-down generally provides a better frame of reference and lends more credibility to your market sizing.

REASON: Bottoms-up at a market level tends to rely on arbitrary variables and leads to market sizes that have no real frame of reference. Mathematically it works, but if you're not exactly sure about the scaling variables, it's more wishful thinking than anything else.

EXCEPTION: Instances where bottoms-up does work, is where your market is very confined, e.g. literally a little street market, an actual store, restaurant etc. This is more related to estimating revenue and not commonly thought of as market sizing.

Hope this helps a bit. Best of luck!

Moritz

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Need a senior McKinsey coach? See my profile in a nutshell
>> Need real McKinsey cases? See two real examples with Zero Carbon Mine (hard) & Car Convenience (Intermediate + brand new)

10
Contact coach
0 comments
ALEXANDRE
Coach
on Nov 03, 2023
FREE INTRO I exMcKinsey EM I exKearney consultant I High Success Rate I Official Coach for HEC (160 coachees in 2022/23)

Hi there!

When it comes to market sizing, the top-down approach is known for its speed in providing a quick, rough estimate. However, it may lack the precision that the bottom-up method offers.

In a real consulting scenario, the top-down method is particularly valuable in two main situations:

  1. When there's a lack of data to perform a thorough bottom-up analysis or when the factors involved are complex and time-consuming to consolidate effectively.
  2. When the top-down estimate is used as a cross-reference to validate the results obtained through the bottom-up method, a technique often referred to as triangulation.

I hope this clarifies things for you!

9
Contact coach
0 comments
Raj
Coach
on Nov 06, 2023
FREE 15MIN CONSULTATION | #1 Strategy& / OW coach | >70 5* reviews |90% offers ⇨ prep-success.super.site | MENA, DE, UK

Thank you for your question. The top-down method for market sizing can be advantageous over the bottom-up approach in certain situations. One such example is when there is limited data available at a granular level or when the bottom-up approach would require significant time and resources to gather detailed information.

In cases where data is scarce or difficult to obtain, the top-down approach allows for a quicker estimation of market size using broader, readily available data sets. This method relies on making assumptions and applying percentages or ratios to estimate the market size based on higher-level indicators.

For instance, let's consider a scenario where you are asked to estimate the market size for a specific type of luxury car in a country. If detailed data on the number of luxury car sales per dealership or region is not readily available, the top-down approach can be more practical. You can start by gathering data on the total number of registered vehicles in the country, the percentage of luxury cars within the overall vehicle market, and the average price of luxury cars. By applying these percentages and ratios, you can estimate the market size for luxury cars in the country.

The top-down approach is particularly useful when time is limited during a case interview or when the focus is on obtaining a high-level estimate rather than a detailed breakdown. It allows you to quickly assess the market potential and make informed decisions based on available data.

However, it's important to note that the choice between top-down and bottom-up approaches depends on the specific case context and the availability of data. In cases where detailed information is accessible and the objective requires a more granular analysis, the bottom-up approach may be more appropriate.

I hope this clarifies the advantages of the top-down approach in certain scenarios. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask.

9
Contact coach
0 comments
Ian
Coach
on Nov 04, 2023
Top US BCG / MBB Coach - 5,000 sessions |Tech, Platinion, Big 4 | 9/9 personal interviews passed | 95% candidate success

Hi there,

It's not about someone, it's about the question.

Some prompts are best answered with one approach for the other.

For example, estimating coffee shop revenue wouldn't make sense top down. Nor would estimating airport throughput. However, bottom-up wouldn;t make sense for the size of a fruit market.

Make sense?

It depends on the prompt…if you are GUESSING you have the wrong approach.

 

Here's a case where I show BOTH approaches (watch the video solution):

https://www.preplounge.com/en/management-consulting-cases/candidate-led-usual-style/beginner/market-sizing-with-solution-number-of-taxis-317

And here are two where I walk you through the approach, again via video:

https://www.preplounge.com/en/management-consulting-cases/candidate-led-usual-style/intermediate/market-sizing-with-solution-coffee-shop-revenue-318

https://www.preplounge.com/en/management-consulting-cases/candidate-led-usual-style/advanced/market-sizing-with-solution-number-of-internet-users-319

8
Contact coach
0 comments
Cristian
Coach
on Nov 02, 2023
#1 rated McKinsey Coach

Hi!

Yes, that's it high-level. 

Sharing here a guide on how these two techniques can be employed in structuring for frameworks, brainstorming and market sizing: 

  • Expert Guide: Mastering Structuring & Brainstorming


Good luck!
Cristian

5
Contact coach
0 comments
Sign up for free to read all answers.
Sign up for free to read all answers.
Yes, I would like to be informed about new content, exciting jobs, relevant events, and selected employers.
By creating an account, I confirm that I agree to PrepLounge's Terms of Use. Please read our Privacy Policy.
Sign up with
You already have an account? Log in here.
Similar Questions
Consulting
How to avoid excessive detail when market sizing?
on Apr 24, 2025
Global
5
400+
Top answer by
Daniel
Coach
Ex-McKinsey, Bain & Kearney | 5+ yrs consulting, coaching & interviewing | 95%+ candidate success
12
5 Answers
400+ Views
+2
Consulting
How many primary teachers are there per 28 students
on Jun 06, 2024
Global
6
1.1k
Top answer by
Pedro
Coach
Bain | EY-Parthenon | Former Principal | 1.5h session | 30% discount 1st session
32
6 Answers
1.1k Views
+3
Consulting
I got a take-home case from a company. It is so generic. How should I approach this?
on Sep 28, 2024
Global
6
2.0k
Top answer by
Florian
Coach
1400 5-star reviews across platforms | 600+ offers | Highest-rated case book on Amazon | Uni lecturer in US, Asia, EU
58
6 Answers
2.0k Views
+3
Top Answer by
Sidi
Coach
McKinsey Senior EM & BCG Consultant | Interviewer at McK & BCG for 7 years | Coached 400+ candidates secure MBB offers
To coach profile
Related Article
Market Sizing
Questions about market size are frequently asked in case interviews in consulting because they require a blend of logic, mathematics, and common sense. They can be asked as standalone questions or as part of a larger case. Applicants who are familiar with market sizing questions can really perform here. What Are Market Sizing Cases?If you're applying to top consulting firms like McKinsey, BCG, or Bain, you're unlikely to escape a market estimation case. Market sizing cases are considered "back-of-the-envelope" calculations because they can be done on the back of an envelope. Despite the name, it's not just about estimating market sizes; other estimations may also be asked for.For example, if you're discussing a British clothing retailer's growth strategy, you could calculate on an envelope how large the online clothing market is and what percentage of the market the retailer already penetrates. If you perform these calculations quickly, the conversation with the client stays fluid, leaving a good impression.You can receive the question about market size as a standalone case (although this is less common) or as part of a more comprehensive problem, such as market entry. The good news: There's no right or wrong answer when it comes to the question of market size. The interviewer is less concerned about the specific number you come up with for the market than the approach you took to arrive at that number. Why Are Market Sizing Cases Commonly Used in Consulting Interviews?Market Sizing Cases are used to test your quantitative and logical abilities. The interviewer wants to ascertain whether you work well with numbers and if you can make informed assumptions and deal with ambiguities. Questions about market size aren't just about the size of markets; they also involve other types of estimations, such as the number of golf balls in a jumbo jet. As you may have noticed, math is crucial in tackling these questions since you don't have a calculator to rely on. Most importantly, you need to be comfortable dealing with large numbers like millions and billions as well as percentages. More on that later. How Do You Best Approach Market Sizing Cases?Now that we understand the theory behind Market Sizing Cases and their relevance to your case interview, let's take a closer look at the process.Segmentation – The Key to Market Sizing CasesIf you've done some reading on case interviews before delving into market sizing questions, you might have come across areas where segmentation is necessary. Segmenting data is a crucial skill you must master as both a candidate in a case interview and in your later career as a consultant. Segmentation generally refers to dividing a larger whole into smaller parts or segments. The principle you need to understand to do this correctly is the MECE principle.MECE stands for "mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive." Simply put, segmenting a group of data according to the MECE principle means forming subgroups that do not overlap but collectively cover the entirety of the data, meaning no data is missing. An example useful for market sizing questions is dividing a country's population into age groups (as different age groups often behave differently).Below is a breakdown into Group 1 in the age range 0 to 14, Group 2 in the age range 15 to 64, and Group 3 for everyone over 65: Note that none of the groups overlap, so no age is counted twice, but also no age is overlooked. Now that the population is correctly segmented, we can treat each group differently. If we had divided the population of the United Kingdom into the aforementioned groups, we could estimate clothing expenditures per person in these groups in online retail. Common sense suggests that expenditures per person in the 0-14 age group are lower than in the 15-64 age group. We can justify this estimation by noting that the majority of 0-14-year-olds do not purchase their clothing online. 
View article
Related Case
Expert case by
Ian
Based on Bain 1st Round Case (2023): Last Mile Delivery
5.0
4.1k times solved
Advanced
Interviewer-led
Open case
Similar Questions
Consulting
How to avoid excessive detail when market sizing?
on Apr 24, 2025
12
5
400+
Consulting
How many primary teachers are there per 28 students
on Jun 06, 2024
32
6
1.1k
Consulting
I got a take-home case from a company. It is so generic. How should I approach this?
on Sep 28, 2024
58
6
2.0k
Everything for Your Career
  • Interview Coaching
  • Q&A
  • Interview Partner
  • Mental Math Tool
  • Interview Drills
  • Stress Questions
  • Blog
Everything for Your Career
  • Interview Coaching
  • Q&A
  • Interview Partner
  • Mental Math Tool
  • Interview Drills
  • Stress Questions
  • Blog
Popular in Consulting
  • Case Library
  • Meeting Board
  • Case Partner
  • Case Interview Basics
  • Case Interview
  • Consulting Q&A
Popular in Finance
  • Finance Q&A
  • Interview in Investment Banking
  • Investment Banking Salaries
Popular in Consulting
  • Case Library
  • Meeting Board
  • Case Partner
  • Case Interview Basics
  • Case Interview
  • Consulting Q&A
Popular in Finance
  • Finance Q&A
  • Interview in Investment Banking
  • Investment Banking Salaries
Consulting and Finance Employers
  • RWE Consulting
  • Whiteshield Advisory
  • All Employers »
About PrepLounge
  • For Companies
  • For Universities
  • For Coaches
  • About Us
  • Career
  • FAQ
© 2012 PrepLounge
Our servers are powered by electricity from renewable sources.
  • Cookies & Privacy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Imprint
  • Sitemap
  • Contact
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
Submit feedback
Thanks for your feedback! Your opinion helps us make PrepLounge even better.
Close Close and keep on prepping
Want to leave already?
After your registration you have free access to:
12 mock interviews with peers
360.000+ peers in our community
36 exercises (incl. structuring drills, mental math, brainteasers and more)
Video tutorials
Video case solutions
Sign up for free
Questions or Feedback?
Select category
  • Select category
  • General Feedback
  • Case Interview Preparation
  • Coaching
  • Technical Problems
  • Other
Your name
Your email address
Cancel