Hi All,
I usually end up a case using the approach explained below, but I would like a feedback about it:
- R --> RECAP: I start by very briefly recap the objective of initial statement of the case
- R--> RECOMMENDATIONS: in a very strict way, I explicit recommendations (e.g. I recommend to enter the market)
- R--> REASONS: 3 reasons supporting the recommendations. Preferably each reason supported by numbers
- R --> RISKS: eventual risks about the recommendations above
- NS --> NEXT STEPS: mitigation actions for each risk
My doubts:
- Is that a recommended approach?
- Is it too long? How much time interviewee has to end up case? 1 min?
- Is it always advisable to include risks? I have doubts that if risks are not so smart, interviewee better off by do not saying anything at all (and so even next steps/mitigation actions)
- Any other advice/suggestion for a brilliant conclusion is appreciated
Thanks a lot,
V