Consulting Consulting
Back to overview

PhD in Physics struggling to break into consulting

Hi everyone,

I really want to break into consulting but somehow can't seem to make it happen. A quick summary of my profile:

  • PhD in Physics (took only 3 years, whereas the norm here is 5-7 years)
  • MSc in Electrical Engineering (3 semesters) – 1.3 overall grade
  • BEng in Electrical Engineering (dual study programme, 6 semesters) – 1.3 overall grade (with distinction)
  • Additional apprenticeship as an Electronics Technician (best in my German state)

I've shown consistent top-level performance for 12 years now and I'm genuinely excited about consulting, but I still haven't managed to land an offer. I already went through McKinsey (eliminated in R1) and several other firms. I rarely get feedback, but when I do, it's usually that I was rejected due to lack of consulting experience. The problem is that no one is giving me the chance to gain any.

Does anyone have suggestions for firms in Germany where I might have better odds given my profile? I'd really appreciate any input!

9
6
500+
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Profile picture of Tarek
Tarek
Coach
on Aug 20, 2026
UAE "WH" | Public Sector expert | Former RB PM | +100 interviews | Cambridge

Your academic record is clearly strong, but the rejection pattern alone does not tell us whether the constraint is eligibility, targeting, application execution, or interview performance.

Before choosing firms, clarify six facts that materially change the answer in Germany: your German level, work authorization, graduation date and application timing, preferred cities, the roles/sectors you have targeted, and your conversion at each stage. For example, fluent German can open more client-facing generalist and Mittelstand work; English-only candidates may need to focus more narrowly on internationally staffed teams and roles whose postings explicitly accept English. Office demand and hiring windows also vary, so verify current openings rather than assume a firm is recruiting uniformly across Germany.

Then diagnose the funnel:

1. Few interview invitations: check eligibility and role fit first, then the CV and application channel. Translate academic achievements into business-relevant proof: the ambiguous problem, people involved, trade-off made, and measurable result. A three-year PhD signals drive, but the application still needs to show communication, teamwork, and decision impact.

2. Interviews but no offer: separate case, fit, and communication feedback. Reaching McKinsey R1 only shows that one application passed one screen; it does not establish broad CV strength across firms or roles.

3. Repeated “no consulting experience” feedback: ask recruiters what evidence is missing. If they mean client exposure or commercial judgment, build a credible example through a pro-bono project, start-up market assessment, university-industry project, or cross-functional improvement initiative. The value is the story you can substantiate: problem, analysis, recommendation, stakeholder response, and outcome.

For German targets, I would research three lanes rather than search for one “easier” firm:

- Technical and operations-oriented consultancies: firms such as Porsche Consulting, d-fine, umlaut/Accenture, or specialist engineering and digital consultancies may value physics, electrical engineering, analytics, operations, or R&D experience. Fit depends on the specific vacancy, language requirement, and office—not the brand alone.

- Broader strategy and transformation platforms: Big Four strategy/operations teams and firms such as Horváth or BearingPoint can be relevant where a posting matches industrials, energy, technology, performance improvement, or transformation. Again, check current role descriptions and required German level.

- Industry bridge roles: corporate strategy, transformation, product strategy, technical-commercial, or internal consulting roles at industrial, energy, telecom, and technology companies can build directly relevant evidence if immediate consulting entry remains difficult. The right duration is outcome-dependent, not a fixed timetable.

Use the apprenticeship carefully as evidence of hands-on technical context and the PhD as evidence of rigorous problem solving; do not assume recruiters will connect those experiences to consulting unless you make the client or business relevance explicit.

A practical next step is to build a targeted list from live vacancies, record language and eligibility requirements, tailor every serious application, and track conversion by lane. Speak with consultants or alumni in the relevant office to test your positioning and timing. If applications rarely convert, revisit eligibility, target mix, CV, and referrals. If interviews convert poorly, focus preparation on the stage that is failing rather than adding another credential.

Anonymous
on Aug 20, 2026
Thank you very much for your time and your detailed reply. Sorry I forgot to mention: I'm a German citizen. I will try out your suggestions and hope that I will be able to perform better in the application process!
Profile picture of Hagen
Hagen
Coach
on Aug 20, 2026
Globally top-ranked MBB coach | >95% success rate | 9+ years consulting, interviewing and coaching experience

Hi there,

First of all, I am sorry to hear about the rejections from McKinsey and the other consulting firms!

I would be happy to share my thoughts on your situation:

  • First of all, please do not read too much into the feedback about the missing consulting experience. Your profile is clearly strong enough on paper based on the few pieces of information your provided, and since you reached the McKinsey interviews, the resume was not the problem with this specific consulting firm. In the first interview round, the decision is made almost entirely on your case and personal fit performance, so this is where I would put my energy.
  • Moreover, I would look beyond MBB at consulting firms. There are many great entry points, and a later move to a larger consulting firm would always be possible.
  • Lastly, I would advise you to do a structured review of your interview performance before the next application with an experienced coach like me, so you know exactly what went wrong and can fix it.

You can find more on this topic here: Boutique consulting firms.

If you would like a more detailed discussion on how to best prepare your application files, for your upcoming pre-interview assessments and/or interviews, please don't hesitate to contact me directly.

Best,

Hagen

Anonymous A
on Aug 20, 2026
Thank you very much, Hagen. I'll definitely consider it!
Profile picture of Hagen
Hagen
Coach
on Aug 22, 2026
Globally top-ranked MBB coach | >95% success rate | 9+ years consulting, interviewing and coaching experience
I'm glad to hear my reply was helpful - and yes, I'm always there for you to help!
Profile picture of Alessa
Alessa
Coach
on Aug 20, 2026
Ex-McKinsey | Ex-BCG | Ex-Roland Berger

hey there :)

Your profile is actually very strong, so I wouldn’t interpret the rejections as a lack of ability. The “lack of consulting experience” feedback is a bit circular, especially with a PhD, and I’d focus on firms where your technical background is an advantage rather than trying to compete purely as a generalist.

In Germany, I’d look particularly at firms with strong industrial, energy, technology, or engineering practices, such as Roland Berger, Strategy&, Oliver Wyman, Arthur D. Little, Porsche Consulting, Siemens Advanta and smaller specialised strategy boutiques. With your physics and electrical engineering background, I’d also look at specialised teams in areas like energy, semiconductors, advanced manufacturing and technology.

One thing I’d definitely investigate is whether your CV is currently positioning you as “very strong academic” rather than “someone who solves business problems”. That can make a surprisingly big difference in consulting recruiting.

And honestly, with your profile, I’d be happy to take a look at your CV or interview approach if you want to figure out where the bottleneck is.

best,
Alessa :)

Anonymous A
on Aug 20, 2026
Thank you, Alessa. I believe that my CV is too academic and I'll try to rewrite it. That's a good point, thank you!
Profile picture of Franco
Franco
Coach
on Aug 20, 2026
Ex BCG Principal & Global Interviewer (10+ Years) | 100+ MBB Offers | 90% Success Rate

Hi,

Based on what you wrote, your profile looks strong enough that I would not assume lack of consulting experience is the core issue.

Most importantly, if you reached McKinsey R1, you already passed the CV screening. From that point onward, the decision is driven primarily by your interview performance: case solving, communication, PEI/fit, and overall presence, not whether you previously worked in consulting.

So before changing your target firms, I would diagnose what happened in the interviews you did get. That is probably the highest-value area to improve.

For Germany, I would still apply broadly across MBB and Tier 2 firms, but I would not lower your ambitions based on your background alone. Your profile is getting you through the door; the priority is converting the interviews into offers.

Also don't underestimate the importance of internal referrals to help you pass the first resume screening step.
 
Best,
Franco

Anonymous A
on Aug 20, 2026
Thank you very much, Franco. The McK R1 rejection was because of my case performance (even though I calculated the math part correctly). In fact, I got rejected from Accenture after R3 (4 in total) with the reason of no consulting experience, and the funny thing is, I applied to a junior position where no consulting experience was needed. So I lost trust of the feedback of the companies.
Profile picture of Benjamin
on Aug 20, 2026
Ex-BCG Principal | 8+ years consulting experience in SEA | BCG top interviewer & top performer

Hi,

It's highly unlikely you are being rejected because you don't have relevant consulting experience.

If that were the case, you would not even be invited to the interviews. 

Once you are in the interviews, all that matters (at a top tier consulting firm) is your interview performance.

Therefore either your fit/behavioural or case was the issue.

You can either try to apply to smaller firms now, or wait another year, prepare better and try again.

You might find my articles helpful given your situation:

5 Reasons Why Experienced Hires Fail the Interview
Breaking into Consulting from a non-traditional background

All the best!

Anonymous A
on Aug 20, 2026
Hi Benjamin, in fact, I got rejected from 2 companies after R2 and R3 with the reason of no consulting experience. I’ve lost a bit of confidence in the feedback from the companies. But thank you very much for the links!
Profile picture of Ian
Ian
Coach
on Aug 20, 2026
Ex-BCG | NYU Stern | MBB, Tech, & Strategy Coach | 5,000+ Sessions | 500+ Offers | 1,000+ Candidates | 100+ Countries

Hi there,

Don't worry, you're going to be just fine. Remember that getting the McKinsey interview invite already is a testament to your strong candidacy.

Here's my advice:

1) Network as much as you can. One "excuse" for your networking can be asking people what role they think you'd be best for.

2) Diversify. Apply to several full time roles across MBB, Tier 2 firms, Big Four firms, and boutiques.

3) Optimize your resume. There are ways to emphasize your strengths and address the weakness in experience.

4) Build experiences. Launch a startup, become the leader of a club, get a part time role, or join a free consulting project. Anything to build that work experience section.

Other firms to consider include Kearney, Deloitte, Strategy&, KPMG, LEK, EY Parthenon, Oliver Wyman, and Roland Berger.

Finally, separate application rejections from interview rejections. If you are reaching interviews but not converting them, the issue is not simply your lack of consulting experience. You need to identify whether the gap is case performance, fit, or communication.

I would also recommend my Applications course. One thing it includes is an application tracker with 40+ firm options, which will help you build a broader and more structured target list.