Get Active in Our Amazing Community of Over 455,000 Peers!

Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Case Partners to connect and practice with!

Market comparison in ridesharing companies Uber/Lyft

growth analysis growth strategy Lyft Uber
New answer on Jun 11, 2019
2 Answers
2.0 k Views
Anonymous A asked on Jun 10, 2019

How does UBer/Lyft,etc measure what city is best and how do they approach it? Net Revenue could do it but what about other metrics like n° of new users, avg riders per user, etc... Market share should be a big factor but how do they know which city is better?

Overview of answers

  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Best answer
Content Creator
replied on Jun 11, 2019
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success (➡ | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching

Hi Anonymous,

I founded a company with a city-based approach similar to the one of Uber and Lyft. The main criteria that we took into consideration to open new cities were:

  • Relevant population of the city
  • Expected frequency of usage of the app (in some cities a particular app could have more potential according to competition/substitutes)
  • Expected revenues per user (in some countries there may be significant differences in income in different areas)
  • Smartphone penetration / app usage (now that’s normalizing but few years ago there was quite a relevant gap in terms of smartphones usage in different areas of a country)
  • Synergies with current cities (eg for operations purposes if two cities are closer that could be better as you may use a centralized team for both)

In our case, costs where pretty similar whatever the city opened, therefore we concentrated more on the revenue side. With other models, acquisition cost and set up costs could also be relevant criteria.

Ad Vlad said this is more relevant in the initial stage, after that you consider more a country–level expansion rather than a city–level one (potentially with similar criteria).

Hope this helps,


Was this answer helpful?
Anonymous A on Jun 11, 2019

Thanks Francesco! Those are overall growth metrics but what about city health? How do you measure that? Perhaps I expressed myself incorrectly but what I meant was which one is best and what is the worst taking into account daily operational metrics like completed/requests, aETA, etc

Francesco on Jun 13, 2019

Hi Anonymous, in terms of daily operation you may consider both revenues and costs metrics to ranks different cities; in our case, for a given level of supply available, the revenues metrics were based mainly on the demand side (users performing the desired activity in the app). Costs metrics were based on the cost of acquiring users performing actions and suppliers providing listings. Each of these dimensions had sub-buckets/funnels which were dependent on the business. According to the funding available, an important element for the health of a city may also be related to how far you are from an expected level where the city is self-sustainable and cash flow positive in case you stop investments for growth. Hope this helps, Francesco

replied on Jun 10, 2019
McKinsey / Accenture Alum / Got all BIG3 offers / Harvard Business School


I've been working at Lyft. That's a strange question. The companies are not deciding which one is better since the end goal is to be everywhere. You just have the cities with a big population and a long tail of small cities. If you are at the early stages, obviously you prioritize bigger population. Short tale requires different operating models and has population cutoffs as well.


Was this answer helpful?
Francesco gave the best answer


Content Creator
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success (➡ | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching
Q&A Upvotes
1624 Reviews
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
You are a true consultant! Thank you for consulting us on how to make PrepLounge even better!