Dear all,
I have received offers from both Imperial and LSE to do MSc Management and I am stuck on which to choose.
LSE is more reputable and will carry a stronger weight when i eventually return to Asia but Imperial does better on rankings (QS/FT) and I like their programme more as they come off as fresher, more revolutionary while LSE seems a little dated, but I don't really have evidence to back this up.
My interest is consulting and MBB. Would going to Imperial significantly reduces my chances? Are they viewed equally in the eyes of recruiters? Thank you!
Interestingly, I found out the MiM (1-year prog) at LSE is only 2 years old. Previously they have been offering a 2-year programme. In that case, do you think the course is still worth going, given the novelty of the course and thus, lower number of graduates from that MSc?
Hi, I would check the results of the last alumni, I would not expect strong differences though if they just decrease the number of courses with the same major
Hi there! I am about to graduate from the LSE MiM and just wanted to clarify that both the MiM (1 year) and the GMiM (2 years) are running. In terms of alumni network, you can easily get in touch with anyone from the department of management, not just graduates from your course. I'm a bit late, but I hope this helps!