Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

Pricing: pricing strategies related to firm's objectives

Hello, 

As I read on Preplounge I understood that there are 3 distinct pricing strategies (competitive-based, value-based and cost-based).

I was wondering whether when considering a firm's objectives (eg. profit, market share, growth, brand positioning) there is a more typical suggestion.

For example a firm's objective is to increase its market share, is it then more typical to adopt a competitive-based strategy?

My question is thus whether there are traditional recommendations per type of goal and if so, which ones.

 

Best regards,

Thank you in advance,

Lisa 

5
600+
13
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Thabang
Coach
on May 04, 2025
Ex-McKinsey Consultant | McKinsey Top Coach & Interviewer | Special Offer: Buy 1 Session Get 1 Free (Limited time!)

Hey Lisa, 

With the 3 pricing strategies, here's something to consider:

  • Cost-based pricing can give you the lower end of where you should price as pricing below this would mean you are entering loss making territory
  • Value-based pricing can you the upper end of where to price if this matched or linked with the customers maximum willingness to pay
  • Competitive-based pricing can be a strategic lever you use in between the two (but can also be upper end of pricing range if this matches customers maximum willingness to pay)

With reference to your specific example, when thinking about a firm's objectives to increase market share, there's a very careful nuance that you'd need to clarify here that could change which pricing strategy you'd want to use.... Let me show you...

  • If by market share you mean revenue, then you'd pick the pricing strategy that maximizes revenue and this would be heavily linked on the price elasticity of the customers and where we are pricing on that price elasticity curve
  • If by market share you mean number of customers, then pricing towards the lower end with cost-based pricing may be the best lever to use as this will invariable be most suitable to increase sales volumes

In a nutshell, there's aren't really traditional recommendations per type of goal, but general principles and nuances that apply to specific cases.

I'd be more than happy to chat through this in more detail with you if you'd like. DM me and we can go further with this

All the best Lisa

Mariana
Coach
edited on May 03, 2025
Free CV evaluation | xMckinsey | 1.5h session | +200 sessions | Free 20-min introductory call

Hi Lisa,

I don’t think there is a one size fits all answer to that. In real life, usually a combination of the three factors is considered: (1) how competitors price similar/alternative products and how our product performs compared to those; (2) what is the value the product generates to our clients and do they care about this value; (3) what are the margins we aim / how much should we price to get X margin / can we price according to value / clients’ value perception and be profitable?

In case interview, the context is usually simpler and it typically gives hints to the candidate about what could make more sense considering the common pricing strategies.

I hope it helps!

Best,

Mari

Daniel
Coach
on May 04, 2025
Ex-McKinsey, Bain & Kearney | 5+ yrs consulting, coaching & interviewing | 95%+ candidate success

Hi Lisa,

Great question! While real-world pricing often blends strategies, here’s a simplified way to match typical pricing strategies to company objectives:

1. Market share growth → Competitive-based pricing

  • Undercut rivals or match their prices to win customers and expand presence

2. Profit maximization → Value-based pricing

  • Price based on customer willingness to pay for differentiated features or brand strength

3. Cost recovery or breakeven → Cost-based pricing

  • Ensure all costs are covered when launching a new product or in a high-volume, low-margin market (e.g., commodity market)

4. Premium brand positioning → Value-based (with a premium)

  • High price signals exclusivity and quality, often seen in luxury or high-tech markets

Let me know if you’d like examples or case-style applications.

Best of luck!

Alessa
Coach
on May 04, 2025
xMcKinsey & Company | xBCG | +200 individual & group coachings | feel free to schedule a 15 min intro call for free

Hey there 😊

love how you're linking pricing to firm strategy – that’s exactly the right mindset! 🎯 You're spot on: pricing should reflect the company’s primary objective. Here's a simple breakdown:

📈 If the goal is...

  • Profit maximisation → Value-based pricing
    Charge what customers are willing to pay for perceived value 💎
  • Market share growth → Competitive-based pricing
    Price aggressively vs. competitors to gain volume 📊
  • Cost recovery or early-stage scale → Cost-based pricing
    Useful when margins are tight or pricing flexibility is low 💰
  • Premium brand positioning → Value-based (high-end)
    Think luxury or tech brands with unique features 🌟

Let me know if you want to test this in a case context – happy to walk you through it! 💬📚

Best, Alessa

on May 08, 2025
#1 Rated McKinsey Coach | Top MBB Coach | Verifiable success rates

Lisa, 

In short, no. 

Especially not when it comes to the actual job of consulting. 

You can also ask your question via ChatGPT or Perplexity and see if you get any sort of research-based backing, but empirically, I wouldn't say that it mostly tends to be this approach or that approach. 

What consultants do at the end of the day is tailor solutions specifically to client situations. That means taking formal 'pricing mechanisms' and then calibrating them to the needs and context of the client. 

Best,
Cristian

Similar Questions
Consulting
Expert Pricing Consultant at Bain: Interview
on Dec 03, 2024
Global
4
1.8k
Top answer by
Florian
Coach
1400 5-star reviews across platforms | 600+ offers | Highest-rated case book on Amazon | Uni lecturer in US, Asia, EU
43
4 Answers
1.8k Views
+1
Consulting
Question about
Exhibit 2 under Part 4
on Jan 14, 2025
Global
2
600+
Top answer by
#1 Coach for Sessions (4.500+) | 1.500+ 5-Star Reviews | Proven Success: ➡ interviewoffers.com | Ex BCG | 10Y+ Coaching
9
2 Answers
600+ Views
Consulting
Is this question inaccurate in general? (Wharton Casebook
on Mar 23, 2025
Global
2
300+
Top answer by
Alessa
Coach
xMcKinsey & Company | xBCG | +200 individual & group coachings | feel free to schedule a 15 min intro call for free
7
2 Answers
300+ Views