Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

Hey, I just did a trial question from the Drill down section of PrepLounge and got this answer. Open to criticism.

And yes, I did notice that risk to company should've been in the company bucket, I kinda ran out of time while writing it down. 

2
< 100
0
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
15 hrs ago
#1 Rated McKinsey Coach | Top MBB Coach | Verifiable success rates

Hi there, 

First of all, before we go deeper into the areas, I would push back against your use of these areas to begin with. 

Market - Company - Product, or Internal / External, or the 3Cs, the 4Ps, Porter's 5, etc, all these structures that are easily recognisable by interviewers and have already been overused can lead you at most to a mediocre performance. Most interviewers will label you immediately once they notice you employing them. 

Consulting interviews try to get a sense of your thinking, so if you bring in template-like structures, they feel almost as if you are refusing to share your actual thinking. Which is why in the last few years, most consulting firms have started coming up with 'unusual' cases, just so they can force candidates outside of the templates that they are learning. 

In short, go for more creative structures that actually enable you as the consultant to work with them with the client and arrive together at an answer.

You can read more about structuring and brainstorming here:


I also offer a first principles structuring masterclass that candidates seem to be finding very useful:

 

Best,
Cristian

Kevin
Coach
8 hrs ago
1st session -50% | Ex-McKinsey | Ex-BCG | MBB Germany Expert | CV & Cover Letter Review | FREE 15min intro call!

Hi there,

Thanks for sharing your structure. You’re already focusing on the right themes like market potential and company readiness. A few suggestions to refine your approach:

  • Structuring: Some of your buckets (like "Chinese Market") mix different aspects. Splitting external market factors, internal company capabilities, and financial impact can help your thinking look clearer and more structured.
  • Additions: Also, regulatory aspects and financial viability are critical in this type of go-to-market decision and should be included.
  • Creativity: The suggested structure is not the most creative. If you find new, creative ways to structure the case, that is great. If you don't, that is still okay as long as you keep the structure MECE and then add even more business judgement and case-specific tailoring later in the case study.

From my experience, one way to think about it could look somewhat like this:

1. Market Attractiveness – Market size, competition, customer needs, regulations
2. Company’s Readiness – Brand fit, supply chain, regulatory readiness, execution resources
3. Financial Case – Revenue/margins, investment required, financial risks
4. Strategic Fit – Alignment with global strategy, impact on core business, long-term potential

Happy to help if you'd like to work through this together!

Best regards,
Kevin

Similar Questions
Consulting
In-Person Case Prep in London, UK
on Aug 24, 2024
UK
3
1.4k
51
3 Answers
1.4k Views
Consulting
Difference in interview case study levels between Experienced Hire and Entry Level (MBB)?
on Sep 17, 2024
UK
4
2.6k
65
4 Answers
2.6k Views
Consulting
How should I tackle case interviews with 2 weeks for prep?
on Sep 19, 2024
USA
6
2.4k
61
6 Answers
2.4k Views
Consulting
Has anyone been asked to do an interview like this
on Sep 21, 2024
UK
5
1.1k
53
5 Answers
1.1k Views
Consulting
Advice on Structuring a Market Entry Case?
on Oct 04, 2024
USA
4
5.6k
62
4 Answers
5.6k Views
Show more