What are McKinsey Cases really like?

1st round interview 2021 McKinsey
New answer on Apr 27, 2021
3 Answers

McKinsey has 6 case examples on their website, I watched 2 mock interview videos provided by McKinsey and today I had a practice interview with a McKinsey consultant. All of these cases were structured alike: a lot of information in the beginning, 3 main parts / questions to each case, 1 quantitative question. A lot of brainstorming and structure required, no endless calculations required. Mostly, they provided all the information needed to solve the case, sometimes you had to ask for specific missing data. I thought, they were all really managable.

BUT: Here on preplounge are so many cases that are labeled "McKinsey-Style" that are nothing like that. You need to know specific formulas or there are endless calculations in every question, or you have to ask for a lot of data yourself and figure out your way. Is this really something that could await me in my interview next week? Should I prepare for that or go with what I've seen so far "directly from the source"?

Any insight would be much appreciated :)


Overview of answers

  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Best answer

Hey there,

McKinsey cases are a bit different and I would definitely stick to what you have seen in your mock interview with the firm. For more details, have a read here: https://strategycase.com/mckinsey-case-interview

Let's break it down below as well:

1. The difference between a McKinsey case and a non-McKinsey case first and foremost lies in the interviewer-led format as you are aware. Every case you have in this case book can be asked from an interviewer-led perspective.

In the McKinsey interview you will have to answer three different questions types - broadly speaking:

  • Structuring
  • Exhibit Interpretation
  • Math

While in candidate-led cases, they should arise naturally when you drill down into your structure, in McKinsey interviews, the interviewer will bring them up in succession.

2. The second big difference lies in the nature of questions asked at McKinsey. At the core, McKinsey wants to see creative ideas communicated in a structured manner, the more exhaustive the better.

As a result, McKinsey cases will usually be very creative in nature and not something that can be solved by looking at industry frameworks or industry trends. For a specific example of a typical McKinsey case, have a look here at the article I wrote: https://strategycase.com/case-interview-frameworks/

The example of the machine breakdown in the lower part of the article is a real McK case question and demonstrates the creative and out-of-the-box aspect of their interviews.

Be aware that frameworks were applicable in the 2000 years, the era of Victor Cheng and Case in Point. McK has long caught up on this and the cases you will get during the interviews are tailored in a way to test your creativity and ability to generate insights, not remember specific frameworks.

3. The third big difference is how to answer the questions in a McKinsey interview. Since the interviewer guides you from question to question, you need to be in the driver's seat for each question and treat each almost like a mini case in itself.

Your goal should be to come up with a tailored and creative answer that fits the question. The framework should - broadly speaking - follow these three characteristics:

  • Broad
  • Deep
  • Insightful

The firm wants to see exhaustive and creative approaches to specific problems, which more often than not do not fit into the classic case interview frameworks (or can be derived from industry drivers and trends) that were en vogue 10 years ago...

Again, this only applies if everything you say

  • adds value to the problem analysis
  • is MECE
  • is well qualified
  • includes a detailed discussion of your hypotheses at the end

As a result, you can spend several minutes, guiding the interviewer through your structure!

Now for Structure and Exhibit Interpretation, there is also no right or wrong answer. Some answers are better than others because they are

  • deep
  • broad
  • insightful
  • hypothesis-driven
  • follow a strong communication (MECE, top-down, signposted)

That being said, there is no 100% that you can reach or the one-and-only solution/ answer. It is important that your answers display the characteristics specified above and supported well with arguments.

As for Math questions, usually, there are answers which are correct (not always 100% the same since some candidates simplify or round differently - which is ok), and others that are wrong, either due to the

  • calculation approach
  • calculation itself

The difference in format and way of answering a question is the reason why I recommend preparing very differently for McK interviews vs. other consultancies.

Now that you know about

  • the different format
  • the different question types and case briefs
  • the ways to answer the questions

you can start using the cases you already have and approach them in a McKinsey-specific way.

If you have any more questions, please feel free to reach out for some free guidance on how to come up with your own McKinsey-type cases on the spot.

Also, check out this answer I wrote on how the cases McKinsey posts online are comparable to the actual interviews: https://www.preplounge.com/en/consulting-forum/are-mckinsey-website-practice-cases-representative-for-what-will-come-10002



Was this answer helpful? 22
Great answer, thank you! This is such a relieve, because my strong suit is definitely more the structuring / creative part. I also have checked out your website.
Glad it helped! All the best with your prep and the interviews!

Hi Anja,

The format you mentioned (interviewer-led, initial prompt with relatively complete information, initial question about structure, question about graph with math, brainstorming/creativity question, lack of conclusion) is the standard one at McKinsey. It is the format you can expect in the actual interview.

The label “McKinsey-Style” used by PrepLounge is a bit misleading, as by that they really mean “Interviewer-led”. It doesn’t necessarily mean the case resembles a McKinsey case. For this reason, some elements may be different from the ones mentioned above.

As an additional point, please be aware that in final rounds McKinsey cases may occasionally be less structured and/or be interviewee-led as well.



Was this answer helpful? 18

Hi, I confirm in McKinsey interviewer-led cases are usually used. However, I recommend practicing also with candidate-led cases. I recommend working with Preplounge cases and the casebooks from top business schools


Was this answer helpful? 0
Florian gave the best answer


Content Creator
#1 rated McKinsey Case and PEI Coach | 5 years at McKinsey | Mentorship Approach | Imbellus Expert
Q&A Upvotes
150 Reviews