Hi!
Best would be to not structure at all with such “Victor Cheng Buckets”.
"Customer - Competitors - Company" is not a proper structure! It is just an arbitrary selection of areas which might (or not) be relevant. Structuring means to create a logic according to which the question can be answered. So this means getting clearness on
1. What is the objective? And how is it measured (what is the focus metric?)
2. How does this focus metric then translate to a criterion to answer the question “Should we enter the home furniture market?”. Usually this criterion is an inequality.
3. How can the elements of this criterion be quantified (→ broken down into drivers and sub-drivers)?
4. Which influencing factors (→ THESE are your buckets!) do we need to consider to quantify the sub-drivers, and thereby test whether the overall criterion can be met or not
This is what no Case book is reaching you. But this is how in reality, rigorous analysis of such “go or no-go decisions” is done. It allows for a far sharper discussion with an interviewer and, and learning this puts candidates at an enormous advantage during MBB interviews.
Coming back to your question: whether you include “Market” (or any other arbitrary element) into your bucket collection is not really relevant. The fact that you are starting your thinking at this level just shows a lack of rigor which causes immense problems for thousands of candidates who have been branwashed into this kind of thinking by low-quality resources and will hence not even understand why they get rejected.
Cheers, Sidi
(edited)