Get Active in Our Amazing Community of Over 451,000 Peers!

Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Case Partners to connect and practice with!

"Market Attractiveness" bucket and "Competitive Landscape" bucket - are they MECE?

Framework
New answer on Oct 23, 2022
5 Answers
1.3 k Views
Anonymous A asked on Nov 04, 2021

Hi, 

I have been looking at different resources. One of the resources mentioned 2 potential buckets that can be customised for cases. They are as follows:

1) Market Attractiveness

- Is the market size big enough? 

- What is the market growth rate?

- What are the market trends?

etc

 

2) Competitive Landscape

- How many competitors are there?

- How big are they in terms of sales or market share?

- Do competitors have any competitive advantage?

- Are there new entrants to the market?

etc 

Some sample answers include Competitors under Market. So I'm trying to understand if the two above mentioned buckets are MECE? Appreciate your advice. Thanks.

Overview of answers

Upvotes
  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Best answer
Hagen
Expert
Content Creator
replied on Nov 04, 2021
#1 Bain coach | >95% success rate | interviewer for 8+ years | mentor and coach for 7+ years

Hi there,

This is indeed an interesting question which is probably relevant for quite a lot of users, so I am happy to provide my perspective on it:

  • Generally speaking, you cannot tell whether the structure is MECE unless you see the whole structure across all levels. As such, could you maybe provide the whole structure to assess it?
  • Still, from a first glance, it seems to be mutually exclusive (ME). Again, you cannot tell whether the structure is collectively exhaustive (CE).
  • When designing a structure, I would advise you think like a project manager who wants to divide tasks among team members - as soon as you feel two team members would work on the same task, the structure is no longer mutually exclusive (ME).

In case you want a more detailed discussion on how to structure any type of case study, please feel free to contact me directly.

I hope this helps,

Hagen

Was this answer helpful?
Florian
Expert
Content Creator
replied on Nov 04, 2021
Highest-rated McKinsey coach (ratings, offers, sessions) | 500+ offers | Author of The 1% & Consulting Career Secrets

Hey there,

Whether or not top-level buckets are MECE, depends on the lower-level, more concrete ideas. Your example would be MECE since 

  • market attractiveness focuses solely on the market size, growth potential, think of it as the pie
  • the competitors, their size, growth, think of it as how the pie is split

To determine if your framework is MECE, always think from the position of an engagement manager trying to divide workstreams to the team. Can two people work on those two branches separately without getting into each other's way? If the answer is yes, then you have created a MECE structure.

Cheers,

Florian

 

 

Was this answer helpful?
Pedro
Expert
replied on Nov 04, 2021
30% off in April 2024 | Bain | EY-Parthenon | Roland Berger | Market Sizing | DARDEN MBA

Your structure is Mutually Exclusive (can't say about the Collectivelly Exhaustive without knowing the question). I do not see any overlap.

As Florian said, it's really about making sure you have no overlaps at second level.

Was this answer helpful?
Ian
Expert
Content Creator
replied on Nov 04, 2021
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate

Hi there,

First, I'm assuming you're referencing just these 2 buckets and not the rest (as we'd have to look at how well we perform in the market, how we'd enter, etc.).

In terms of their ME-ness (Mutually Exclusiveness), they absolutely are! If you wanted to, this could be 1 bucket. You could even throw in customers there. As long as you're talking about the market itself and the dynamics within, that can be one bucket.

Alternatively, you can say a) Is the market as a whole good and b) Are the dynamics within it good (competition). This also works!

It's all about how you define your point of seperation. Make sense?

Was this answer helpful?
Pedro replied on Oct 23, 2022
Senior Associate @ Strategy& (PwC) | Erasmus RSM Exec. MBA | Looking for solid case study partners!

Dear anonymous

From a perspective of taking a step back and structure at the very high level: competitors are indeed part of the market (and market attractiveness / unattractiveness). For instance, competitors influence the market size and growth, also consumers. By separating these into different buckets, a certain level of overlap takes place.

If we are to put a bucket for “Market Research / Attractiveness", we should therefore not only include its size and grow, but also competitors, trends, consumers behaviour, etc. All of these aspects will through light on the potential market´s essentials.

I hope that helps

Pedro

Was this answer helpful?
5
Hagen gave the best answer

Hagen

CoachingPlus Expert
Premium + Coaching Expert
Content Creator
#1 Bain coach | >95% success rate | interviewer for 8+ years | mentor and coach for 7+ years
486
Meetings
15,731
Q&A Upvotes
88
Awards
5.0
414 Reviews