(edited)
Thanks a lot, Freddy!
(edited)
Hi Furkan,
there are usually two reasons why you receive feedback that your structure is not enough customized:
If you follow these two points, your structure should be customized enough for the case.
Best,
Francesco
I had similar feedback for McK phone case. Without diving deep into detail as I am sure someone will have a better answer, two methods that work for me:
1) Try and use a MECE issue tree if you can before resorting to a framework as many times an issue tree will be super specific to the case
2) This may or may not work but its worked for me sometimes: Change the names of some of your categories in your framework to be SUPER specific. For example If you use a 2CP for a zoo/school/etc..instead of saying "I would like to look into the company, customer, competition, and product" say "I would first want to understand how the Zoo itself functions, as well as the effect to the Ticket holders, Other zoos, and the attractions our client's zoo provides"
Take this with a grain of salt as others with more experience may not agree with these two and I have not yet had my in-person yet. My sole opinion
Thanks a lot, Freddy!
Discover the secrets to Goal setting, Reality checking, Options exploring, and Way forward planning that will redefine your path to success.
Find out what the McKinsey Imbellus Game is all about. Get specific insights on how to ace your case interview at McKinsey.
Structured framework for sustainable corporate development, including market penetration, product development, market development and diversification.
The Influence Model by McKinsey emerged in the early 2000s and is the result of practical experience of the consultants at McKinsey & Company.
Discover what McKinsey's 7S framework is and how it helps companies maximize their strengths and identify weaknesses while focusing on 7 internal elements.
Thank you very much, Francesco!