Difference between these 2 Questions

Hi there,

You can answer these questions in a very similar way (unless you have something extremely relevant which is not in your CV – but why should that be the case?).

You may just want to have a different initial sentence.

• For “Walk me through your resume” you can highlight first the main experiences you are going to present later – that is, what you did (eg “Sure, I would like to tell you more about my education at XYZ, work experiences and interests in ABC”). Then you can describe the experiences
• For “Tell me about yourself” you can highlight the characteristics these experiences show – that is, who you are (eg “I would define myself as analytical, entrepreneurial and someone naturally enjoying working with people”). Then you can describe the experiences showing those characteristics

Your point 1 and 2 are fine – be sure to emphasize:

• Details of the experience
• Connection with the skill the experience shows

A good answer would emphasize:

• Three parts of your CV that you consider most relevant. This may involve working experience, education and/or extracurricular activities, or more focus on one of these areas, according to your profile.
• The description of the stories
• How the mentioned experiences helped you to develop skills that are useful in consulting. In this part make clear you have the characteristics of a good consultant.

You may then conclude by saying that such a path naturally brought you to be interested in consulting.

You don’t need to answer Why McKinsey as part of the answer. I agree with Ken that “Why us” is rare at McKinsey; when asked, it is normally a separate question.

Best,

Francesco

Hi there,

These are both "Resume Walkthrough" questions and should indeed be answered in pretty much the same way. That said, if "tell me about yourself" comes after "resume walkthrough", you'll have to have a 1-3 setence summary of who you are (strengths, interests, driving forces, etc.)

For your resume walkthrough, I recommend the following:

• Needs to be chronological
• Only keep important details that make you look good (i.e. I worked across 7 industries and rose up the ranks twice in the course of that role)
• Keep a theme of "why consulting"
  • I.e. at each step you need to show that you both got exposure to aspects of consulting AND thrived + enjoyed them
• Finish with: And that's why I'm here today looking for consulting with your company

The two questions can be asked synomously. If asked separately or in an actual consultant interview, I would be a lot more personal with your answer. These questions don't strictly constitute the fit proportoin of the McKinsey interview and its more intended to be a ice breaker as well as an opportunity for your interviewer to get to know you personally.

Your outline makes sense but I wouldn't be too worried about trying to strictly answer "what McK is looking for". Introducing your background and highlighting 1-2 experiences is usually enough where your interviewer will also want to have an opportunity to ask questions and probe. In my experience, the "why McK" answer isn't that important. I personally never asked in the 200+ interviews I conducted as a McK interviewer and was also never asked as a candidate.

Good luck!

Ken is spot on, couldnt agree more.

Hi,

Yes, these questions are supposed to be answered in a similar way, if not the same. It is very unlikely the interviewer will ask you one and then another, as they kinda imply each other.

Both answers require a chronological answer. If the interviewers want you to walk them through your CV, they also want to make sure you know how to present yourself and that you talk freely about your path.

Hope it helps!

Cheers,

GB