Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

Depth and width of framework?

So I just had my first round second interview with McKinsey. Interestingly it was an interview with an associate partner.

The interviewer pointed out at the start that I had a generic framework approach which I would argue is not entirely true. While the profitablity buckets were Revenues and Costs (generic) within this, I had expanded tailored to the industry and business specifically. 

Example: Integrated business so variable costs were different, High end products so associated branding and packaging costs. On the revenue side, since it was a revenue increase concern, I split it into existing, new, and inorganic and expanded within that.

The interviewer then proceeded to ask me the 'what else' question 5 times for revenues and 3 times for costs. Each time appriciating my diverse ideas however, consistently asking for more.

As a result, my question is, when presenting a framework we have 1-2 minutes, was this just the interviewer pressuring me to see if I could think wide or was there an issue with the framework.

Note: I understand this is inadequate detail, so please do let me know what further information you would need, thank you!

6
2.9k
12
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Florian
Coach
edited on Aug 17, 2021
1400 5-star reviews across platforms | 600+ offers | Highest-rated case book on Amazon | Uni lecturer in US, Asia, EU

Hey there,

-----

UPDATE

I have written a detailed insider perspective on the McKinsey case interview here: https://www.preplounge.com/en/mckinsey-interview

-----

I think the misunderstanding might be in the difference between a framework derived for McKinsey vs. a framework created for other consulting interviews.

At the core, McKinsey wants to see creative ideas communicated in a structured manner, the more exhaustive the better.

Your goal should be to come up with a tailored and creative answer that fits the question. The framework should - broadly speaking - follow these three characteristics:

  • Broad
  • Deep
  • Insightful

As I understand from your answers (with limited context, be aware!), you lacked some creative ideas. Branding and packaging are still generic and you would need to go into more detail and qualify your answer with practical examples and more details.

Since you say you have 1-2 minutes to present the framework, I think that is where the disconnect comes in. In a McKinsey interview, you can take up to 6-8 minutes to present your structure, your qualification, and hypotheses. This is due to the interviewer-led format that McK employs. The interviewer will only ask 'what else' if you 

  • haven't gone broad or deep enough
  • did not explain your ideas well enough for them to stand out (again, you have time here)

The firm wants to see exhaustive and creative approaches to specific problems, which more often than not do not fit into the classic case interview frameworks that were en vogue 10 years ago...

Again, this only applies if everything you say

  • adds value to the problem analysis
  • is MECE
  • is well qualified
  • includes a detailed discussion of your hypotheses at the end

The difference in format and way of answering a question is the reason why I recommend preparing very differently for McK interviews vs. other consultancies.

Pressure interviews are not a thing at McK! 

Cheers,

 Florian

Anonymous B
on Jul 13, 2021
100 !!! deserves more upvotes ! This is the first answer that mentions this about McKinsey ! I went through the coaching sessions for McKinsey, Structure is expected to be very detailed with lots of creative ideas and you should take 5-8 mins to present it ! Unlike BCG and Bain ! totally different !
Florian
Coach
on Jul 13, 2021
1400 5-star reviews across platforms | 600+ offers | Highest-rated case book on Amazon | Uni lecturer in US, Asia, EU
Thank you very much. Greatly appreciate it :-)
Denis
Coach
edited on Mar 25, 2021
Goldman Sachs Investment Banker NYC | Ex-Bain 5 yrs| MBA Chicago Booth | Passed > 13 MBB > 20 IB interviews

I would also argue the framework is too shallow, narrow, and does not cover all the required steps to solve the ENTIRE problem at hand and to present an approach for the ENTIRETY of the case. It is about showing from A-Z everything you want to do based on the GOAL and the SCOPE of the case. This just represents one possible CONTENT framework for the first couple of minutes of the case. 

This kind of skill, structuring to MBB level, making sure the structure involved both PROCESS steps and CONTENT frameworks covering the entire problem and providing roadmaps for the entire case interview is exactly what I focus on with my coachees. Reach out if interested. 

In any case, best of luck with the rest of the process!

Anonymous A
on Mar 25, 2021
I understand, just as a follow up on this, as I understand it, we have only a few moments to explain the framework, the depth / width of the what - else questions my interviewer was asking could not have been covered in this time, with regard to that, do you think that was him pressure testing or is that level of width / depth expected in the framework answer itself?
Denis
Coach
on Mar 25, 2021
Goldman Sachs Investment Banker NYC | Ex-Bain 5 yrs| MBA Chicago Booth | Passed > 13 MBB > 20 IB interviews
In the answer itself. You want to give / present everything I mentioned when you come back from your time off structuring.
Ian
Coach
on Mar 26, 2021
Top US BCG / MBB Coach - 5,000 sessions |Tech, Platinion, Big 4 | 9/9 personal interviews passed | 95% candidate success

Hi there,

I completely agree with Florian (deserving of most upvotes here).

You clearly didn't have enough ideas, that weren't deep enough, and that weren't actually tailored enough to the case.

If he asked 5 and 3 times respectively, he wasn't "testing" you, you were missing something.

Ken
Coach
on Mar 26, 2021
Ex-McKinsey final round interviewer | Executive Coach

It's difficult to comment not knowing the case and your full answer but it is worth realising that you don't always get "good" interviewers who are engaged with your answer and are good at asking probing questions to help you deepen your answer (and your resulting interview score). The "what else" question is an easy default that many McKinesy interviewers use, often due to laziness, but if intetionally then they are testing your ability to broaden your thinking (i.e., think outside the box) and/or take a step back and prioritise within your structure.

The example you shared is a great sign of a strong candidate who is able to identify the interdependecies in their structure. I'm not suggesting you didn't do so but it's worth thinking about whether you might have been missing details and specificities behind your structure (i.e., 3/4th level detail) as well as specific insights from the case brief that would relevant to build your hypothesis. 

Clara
Coach
on Mar 27, 2021
McKinsey | Awarded professor at Master in Management @ IE | MBA at MIT |+180 students coached | Integrated FIT Guide aut

Hello!

First of all, take everything with a pinch of salt since we weren´t thre, hence it´s impossible to be very accurate. 

Given tha numbr of follow up questions he was making and judging by the tree you presented, unfortunately it does seem too simplistic/shallow/non targeted. 

Cheers, 

Clara

Gaurav
Coach
on Mar 28, 2021
#1 MBB Coach(Placed 750+ in MBBs & 1250+ in Tier2)| The Only 360° coach(Ex-McKinsey+Certified Coach+Active recruiter)

Hey there!
 

If the interviewer continuously asking you "What else?" on the same point - it definitely means that you are missing something. They would never do it just to "broaden the framework". I suggest you to work through the case once again to see what you were missing out. 

If you need help or have other questions - feel free to write to me!
GB

Similar Questions
Consulting
McKinsey feedback call after rejection
on Jun 19, 2024
Global
7
2.7k
Top answer by
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience
68
7 Answers
2.7k Views
+4
Consulting
McKinsey PEI - Same incident/story for Courageous Change and Inclusive Leadership
on May 28, 2024
Global
7
2.9k
Top answer by
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience
84
7 Answers
2.9k Views
+4
Consulting
Just did the Mckinsey Solve Game (January 2025) - got some questions/insights
on Apr 24, 2025
Global
5
4.5k
Top answer by
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience
43
5 Answers
4.5k Views
+2
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
Thanks for your feedback! Your opinion helps us make PrepLounge even better.