Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

Verbalizing Framework

I'm trying to determine the clearest way to verbalize my framework -- I've come across 2 methods in my practice cases, and I'm wondering which is recommended

1. Say all buckets first, then dive into them

eg. I want to look at 3 areas: X, Y, and Z. For X, I will assess A, B, C. For Y, .... etc.

 

2. Go all the way through each bucket, one at a time

eg. I want to look at 3 areas. First, I will look at X. I will assess A, B, and C. Next, I will look at Y.... etc.

6
100+
7
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Evelina
Coach
on Jun 11, 2025
EY-Parthenon (7 years) l BCG offer holder l 97% success rate l 30% off first session l free 15' intro call l LBS

Hi there,

Great question — both methods are used, but I’d recommend Method 1: stating all your buckets first, then diving into each one. It tends to come across as more structured and strategic, which is exactly what interviewers are looking for.

By laying out the full roadmap upfront (e.g. “I’ll look at X, Y, and Z”), you give your interviewer a clear, high-level overview of your thinking — almost like a table of contents. It shows that you’ve thought holistically about the problem before diving into the details.

Then, when you go into each bucket, you can elaborate systematically without the listener losing the big picture.

Method 2 can feel more like you’re building the structure as you go, which risks sounding less organized — even if the content is strong.

So, unless you're under extreme time pressure, I’d go with Method 1 to demonstrate top-down, executive-style communication.

Let me know if you need further help!

Best,

Evelina 

Hagen
Coach
on Jun 12, 2025
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 9+ years consulting, interviewing and coaching experience

Hi there,

I would be happy to share my thoughts on your question:

  • I would strongly advise you to use the first method - mention all top-level factors/dimensions/steps first, then go into the details of each of them. This approach is called top-down communication and is a critical skill in consulting.

You can find more on this topic here: How to succeed in the final interview round.

If you would like a more detailed discussion on how to best prepare your application files, for your upcoming pre-interview assessments and/or interviews, please don't hesitate to contact me directly.

Best,

Hagen

Alessa
Coach
on Jun 11, 2025
xMcKinsey & Company | xBCG | xRB | >400 coachings | feel free to schedule an intro call for free

hey there!

I recomment the first method! Listing all buckets first is more top-down, shows structure, and helps your interviewer get the big picture before diving into details. It also signals confidence and clarity. Just keep it crisp so you don't lose them in too much detail too early.

best,
Alessa :)

Phenyo
Coach
on Jun 11, 2025
Ex-McKinsey Consultant | Nova Top Talent - Madrid | McKinsey HiPo recruit | McKinsey Digital & Analytics
I agree
Mariana
Coach
on Jun 11, 2025
Free CV evaluation | xMckinsey | 1.5h session | +200 sessions | Free 20-min introductory call

Hi there,

Go with the first one. Organize it so that the most important one comes first and finalize this session by stating where you would start in terms of bucket, the specific subtopic and WHY.

Best,

Mari 

Mihir
Coach
on Jun 11, 2025
McKinsey Associate Partner and interviewer | Bulletproof MBB prep

The first method is definitely better and more top-down.

Your interviewer will quickly have a bird's eye view of your entire structure in the first method, before you start giving details.

In the second method, they will not have a clear sense of what your overarching structure is and how long you're going to talk for, until you finish!

on Jun 12, 2025
#1 Rated McKinsey Coach | Top MBB Coach | Verifiable success rates

The first model is the correct one. 

It's called the pyramid principle and you can learn more about it from books such as Barabara Minto's pyramid principle (though a quick ChatGPT synthesis will give you the gist of it). 

That is how you should present all 'content'-related questions in consulting interviews.

Best,
Cristian

Similar Questions
Consulting
Technology Implementation Case Framework
on Mar 08, 2025
USA
6
1.2k
Top answer by
Mattijs
Coach
Free 15m intro call | First session -50% | Bain| Hiring team | 250+ successful candidates
25
6 Answers
1.2k Views
+3
Consulting
how much time should I spend developing a framework during an interview and how much time is acceptable to spend doing math calculations?
on Jan 24, 2025
South America
8
800+
Top answer by
Matthew
Coach
Ex-BCG R1 Case Interviewer | Former Campus Recruiting Captain | Focused coaching to accelerate offline case prep
20
8 Answers
800+ Views
+5
Consulting
Profitability Case Framework? Capital One Mini Case Interview
on Jul 24, 2024
Global
1
5.6k
Top answer by
153
1 Answer
5.6k Views