Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

Mental Maths: Best way to do division?

This is especially for certain chart interpretations where we have to find the percentage growth across periods

So for example, if something is growing at a rate of 60/130, what I do in my head is say 60/120 is 50%, so if the denominator is increasing by a bit, then the number should be lower to around 40%

But I know this way isn't exactly "correct" so im struggling to figure out the best method for this that won't take forever

2
< 100
1
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Kevin
Coach
2 hrs ago
1st session -50% | Ex-McKinsey | Ex-BCG | MBB Germany Expert | CV & Cover Letter Review | FREE 15min intro call!

Hi there,

Your idea to find an easy approximation is already very good! Let me share how you can do this a bit more precisely: Instead of adjusting the denominator, just change the numerator to make the math easier. Here’s how I’d do it:

Let’s say you have 60 ÷ 130. That looks annoying at first, but you can follow 3 simple steps:

  1. Add 5 to the 60. Why? Because 65 ÷ 130 is exactly 50%.
  2. Now, adjust for that extra 5 you added. What’s 5 ÷ 130? That’s just under 4%.
    Here’s a trick to estimate that quickly:

    Think of 5 ÷ 130 as 10 ÷ 130, divided by 2.
    10 ÷ 130 is like 1 ÷ 13, which is around 7.7%.
    Half of that gives you roughly 3.85%.

  3. Now subtract that from the 50% you had at the start.
    So, 50% – just under 4% = just over 46%, which is pretty much the correct answer (actual value ≈ 46.15%).

Bottom line: Do an approximation to an easier number, but adjust the numerator instead of the denominator. 

Bonus tip for interviews: Memorise common fractions - things like 1/4 = 25%, 1/5 = 20%, 1/6 ≈ 16.7%, 1/11 ≈ 9%, 1/13 ≈ 7.7%. That’ll save you tons of time in interviews and make you look like a mental math pro without much effort!

Feel free to book a free intro call with me to learn how you can effortlessly navigate through math problems during cases!

Hope that helps.

Cheers,

Kevin

Joel
Coach
38 min ago
Buy 1 get 1 free (July only) | Kearney | Ex-RB | Involved in recruiting | Passed 10/10 interviews | 250+ interviews

Hello,

I really like your thinking; you’re already heading in the right direction.

Here are a few tips to keep in mind as you continue practicing:

  1. Simplify the calculations: When performing a complex calculation, make it easier by asking to round up or down, but do so properly. The best practice is to clearly state what you're rounding to and justify it by noting that the difference is no more than ~5%, so it won't significantly affect the analysis. This shows you're being pragmatic, not careless.
  2. Present your methodology first: Before diving into detailed math, explain your approach and confirm it with the interviewer so you can get them on board.
  3. Talk through your math out loud: Verbalizing your calculations allows the interviewer to follow your logic, offer guidance if needed, and gives you a chance to impress them.

For this specific case, and to build on Kevin’s solid approach, Step #2 can be simplified as follows:
5 ÷ 130 = 0.5 ÷ 13 = 1 ÷ 26 ≈ 1 ÷ 25 = 4%

Hope this helps! Feel free to reach out if you have any follow-up questions.

Best, 

Joel

Similar Questions
Consulting
To the Professional Coaches: Your experience with students that are bad in math
on Oct 10, 2024
Global
6
1.1k
55
6 Answers
1.1k Views
Consulting
I can not catch up with what the interviewer is saying
on Oct 19, 2024
Global
8
1.4k
72
8 Answers
1.4k Views
Consulting
Mckinsey solve test in 3 weeks - how to organise?
on Nov 05, 2024
Global
2
2.6k
44
2 Answers
2.6k Views
Consulting
What are the maths topics needed to ace the Redrock Study in the Mckinsey Solve Game?
on Nov 10, 2024
Global
3
1.1k
30
3 Answers
1.1k Views
Consulting
How do I Case Prep while interning at an MBB?
on Dec 01, 2024
Global
5
1.0k
47
5 Answers
1.0k Views
Show more