Does the interviewer assignment (e.g., which Partners or Directors you meet) depend on prior-round performance or feedback, or perhaps on the candidate’s background or fit with certain practices? I’ve also noticed some final-round scheduling takes much longer than usual, could that delay be related to finding a specific interviewer match?
Would really appreciate insights from those who’ve been involved in or familiar with the process.
Hi there,
Here is the answer to your questions:
1. Yes, assignment of interviewer can depend on the candidate's background/fit with a certain practice for sure. This is often the case, if e.g., the candidate has extensive experience within a specific field that was one of the reasons the firm was interested in them to interview
2. It does happen that prior-round feedback can influence the interviewer assignment in the final round, but that is quite rare. I've seen cases in smaller offices where a candidate did great on multiple interview aspects, but badly on a single area, which caused the office to assign them a specific partner known to be great at probing that particular skillset. But, in my 6 years of interviewing - I've only seen this happen once.
3. The main reason final round scheduling takes longer, is simply because the partners have busier schedules. It's harder to find a single day where 2-3 partners can be available in direct sequence.
I hope this helps!
Sincerely,
Thor
Great question — but in reality, interviewer assignment is rarely about matching background or industry alignment. It's almost always driven by scheduling logistics, especially given that where Partners’ calendars are always chaotic.
Unless you’re being interviewed for a highly specialized track (e.g. tech expert track, or very senior lateral hire), your background doesn’t usually affect who you get. Similarly, delays in scheduling are more likely due to availability rather than trying to “find the right match”.
So no need to overthink the pairing — focus on being adaptable across interviewer styles.
Hope it helps!
Hey there :)
From my experience, the interviewer assignment doesn’t directly depend on prior-round performance. Delays in scheduling usually aren’t about finding a specific interviewer match but are normal because they often check overall fit and availability across the office. Background and practice alignment can play a role in who you meet, but the process is mostly standardized.
best, Alessa :)
Hi there,
The interviewer usually doesn't depend on your previous interview performance. It might depend on your background / fit with select practice, though, especially if you are not a fresh graduate.
The scheduling delay is likely due to the availability of the interviewers. As they are more senior for 2nd round / final round, you can probably imagine that their schedules are harder to secure.
Best,
Emily
No, there is no 'matching' element.
Only when you apply for specialist / expert roles, and the interview component requires they also test your knowledge that is required for that role, do they actually pair you up with somebody from that practice who can test you.
But aside from this, it's pretty much randomised (at least for most firms / offices).
Best,
Cristian
