Hi,
In a recent interview, the feedback I received was that I wasn't driving the case forward strongly enough, although individual components were good (worked with a coach on structuring, exhibits, maths, etc).
Too often I feel I'm lost in knowing what information is relevant to the case question. And which insights are actually useful to take away from exhibits. Like I'm guessing the next direction and hoping it's the right one.
Is driving the case more about common sense or is there a particular method to this? And secondly, how do you approach more non-traditional cases where that path is even less obvious?
Thank you!