How to be concise and adopt "pyramid principal" consistently?

communication
New answer on Oct 27, 2023
4 Answers
706 Views
Anonymous A asked on Jan 26, 2022

I would like to seek some advice on how to be concise and adopting pyramid principal “consistently” through the case. 

A bit background: I always adopt the pyramid principal in the conclusion, however I find that my communication along the case is not concise and sharp enough, and I'm not always consistently communicating in a “top down” style. 

In my interview today, the interview kept on interrupting me when I explained through the idea by asking me “what else”? Also, when I explained through the logic, he also interrupted and asked me so what are the things you want to look at? I feel that I might be over-explaining a bit as sometimes I wanted to show the clear reasoning behind, but I have gone into too detail. 

Any suggestions on how to practice to be concise, instead of over explaining (giving too much example, linking to self-experience too much, illustrating too much, etc)? Appreciate it!

Overview of answers

Upvotes
  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Best answer
Ian
Expert
Content Creator
updated an answer on Jan 27, 2022
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate

Remember the objective/question - If they ask a question, listen intently and lead with an answer. When working through the case, remember everything you do should be focused on the objective

Structure your thinking - When thinking + speaking, use structure to organize everything. By grouping things and talking in buckets you'll get your point across more concisely

Signpost - If needing to communicate multiple things, first state those x things! Then, afterwards, dive into each. So "I"m thinking about this in 3 ways. Way A, Way B, and Way C. In terms of Way A...."

Remember less is more - Think about longer sentences/phrases you use. Reflect on how to make them shorter. Much like you edit an essay, edit your speaking. Why use 5 words when a well-placed single word encompases that? Build your vocabulary (especially business vocabularly) to be able to use key words instead of wasting time "explaining" a concept

Practice with others - Tell others that you're working on this. Ask them to force you to be concise. So, tell them to interrupt you if you're rambling! Record yourself for answers and listen to yourself....look for ways you could have been quicker.

Take a few seconds - gather your thoughts. Perhaps right them down. Take a quick breather to better formulate and then articulate your thoughts

  1. Pause before speaking to gather your thoughts - the time may feel like forever for you, but it's not nearly as long as you think. Leverage filler sentences such as "that's and interesting point" to buy some time if needed.
  2. Frame your answer - Generally, MBBers say "There are 3 parts to this". Then, they highlight in 1 sentence each of the 2-4 points
  3. Iterate through each point - After framing how you're going to answer the question, then answer it by diving into each "part" in the order you summarized each.

(edited)

Was this answer helpful?
Moritz
Expert
Content Creator
replied on Jan 26, 2022
ex-McKinsey EM & Interviewer | 7/8 offer rate for 4+ sessions | 90min sessions with FREE exercises & videos

Practice, practice, practice! You'll get there!

Good communication is based on 3x things:

  • Being structured in the first place (MECE)
  • Communicating said structure top-down (pyramid)
  • Active listening (adapting your speech with ease)

Based on what you're saying you tend to follow one path in your issue tree from beginning to end and go into detail before you've systematically gone through your 1st level buckets and 2nd level drivers. This is a job half done i.e. you have a good MECE structure but you don't follow through because you haven't internalized top down communication yet.

At MBB, this is pursued religiously and takes plenty of practice for most people because we're naturally “bottoms up” oriented i.e. detail first. So don't feel bad for not getting it right!

Feel free to reach out if this is something you'd like to get some help with!

 

Was this answer helpful?
Benjamin
Expert
Content Creator
replied on Oct 27, 2023
Ex-BCG Principal | 8+ years consulting experience in SEA | BCG top interviewer & top performer

This is a great question - and one that even consultants on the job struggle with all the time.

I think getting better at this is a function really of 2 things

  1. Proper understanding of the principle
    • Quite often people follow the ‘structure’ or ‘process’ of what they think they need to do, but they may not understanding the thinking behind it or the true logic behind it
    • What you then get is ‘structured’ answers that are weak or not robust
  2. Practice
    • Being structured is a skill - and you will only get better by practicing it and training your mind to think and respond in a certain way
  3. Feedback
    • Lastly, quality feedback is really, really important
    • You will only know how to improve if you know what good looks like and how to get there
    • On the job, consultants also learn based on this apprenticeship model - so no different here when you are preparing for cases

Hope this helps anyone facing a similar situation.

 

 

Was this answer helpful?
Cristian
Expert
Content Creator
replied on Oct 27, 2023
#1 rated MBB & McKinsey Coach

Lots of great answers below. 

Just adding an additional resource on structuring techniques that you might find helpful:


Aside from this, read ‘The Pyramid Principle’ by Barbara Minto. It's THE book on the pyramid principle.

Best,
Cristian

———————————————

Practicing for interviews? Check out my latest case based on a first-round MBB interview >>> SoyTechnologies  

Was this answer helpful?
Ian gave the best answer

Ian

Content Creator
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate
1,094
Meetings
77,108
Q&A Upvotes
232
Awards
5.0
150 Reviews
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely