Get Active in Our Amazing Community of Over 451,000 Peers!

Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Case Partners to connect and practice with!

How do you estimate percentages?

Math problem
New answer on Oct 17, 2022
4 Answers
621 Views
Anonymous A asked on Oct 16, 2022

Strangely, I haven't found a lot on that one on the internet (mostly videos clearly geared towards school children). 

My issue: I am good at case math and good with numbers in general. Where I do have an issue - depending on the numbers - is to estimate a percent increase / decrease on the fly. This can be super useful to interpret a number quickly after you come up with it (and where it would sound ridicolous to take another 20 seconds to calculate it fully through in your head). 

Ofc I know the typical tricks (i.e. if multiply the denominator close to 10 or 100 etc.) but sometimes I get really weird numbers, such as 37/587  where it is not really obvious at first. The only thing I could deduce here is tht it is between 5% and 10% (since 5% of 58 is 29 and 10% 58) 

When I interview candidates I realize that flaw as well, i.e. most gravitate towards “it is a 50% percent decrease” even though when its much closer to 40%. 

How do you handle that in general?

Overview of answers

Upvotes
  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Benjamin
Expert
Content Creator
updated an answer on Oct 16, 2022
Ex-BCG Principal | 8+ years consulting experience in SEA | BCG top interviewer & top performer

Hello,

I can suggest 2 methods that have worked for me:
 

1) Round both numbers

  • In your example of 37/587, I would round that to 40/600
  • This whole number fraction is a much more familiar number and easier to ‘memorize’ if need be
  • 40/600 = 6.67%; 37/587 = 6.3%

2) Round the denominator and estimate multiples based on a fraction of that

  • So to take your example again, my thought process would have been: 37/587 is 37/600 → 1% of 600 is 6 → 6 * 6 is ~36 which is closest to 37, so the answer is ~6%


In both methods, its also useful to take note of the magnitude/direction that you round the numbers, that can affect the magnitude of error (though most often slightly).

Lastly, as an interviewer, if you had used method #1 and answered ~7% instead of 6.3%, i wouldn't really have cared. In terms of % and quant more generally, what I look out more for is 

  1. Order of magnitude errors → i.e. if the answer should be a clear single digit, and the candidate gives a double digit
  2. Speed and accuracy of the actual calculation → i.e. if you come up with an answer quickly, and I ask you to explain how you came up with that number, it should match your formula

Other coaches may also suggest other useful methods that have worked for them. In the meantime, happy to answer any further questions on any of my points

 

(edited)

Was this answer helpful?
Best answer
Pedro
Expert
replied on Oct 17, 2022
30% off in April 2024 | Bain | EY-Parthenon | Roland Berger | Market Sizing | DARDEN MBA

Let me suggest a different approach. You never know which one works best for you. This one requires you having a good grasp of the multiplication table.

1. 37/587 = 0,37 / 5,87 = 37% / 5,87

2. 37% / 5,87 → 37% /

3. 37% is pretty close to 36%

4. 36% / 6 = 6%

What I want to highlight here is that while you always want to round the denominator, doing the same on the numerator may not always be the best option. If you round up to 40 you are going to be less precise than “rounding” down to 36. 

While 36 is not round… 36/6 is round! Much easier than 40/6

By the way, with this process you are likely to be more accurate than with rounding both numerator and denominator.

Having said this, both are acceptable during the interview. Use whatever works for you.

Was this answer helpful?
Ian
Expert
Content Creator
updated an answer on Oct 17, 2022
#1 BCG coach | MBB | Tier 2 | Digital, Tech, Platinion | 100% personal success rate (8/8) | 95% candidate success rate

Hi there,

It's really quite simple - you should round here (and confirm with the interviewer).

37/587 is like 40/600. That's like 20/300 which is like 10/150, which is like 1/15. 

15 goes into 100 between 6 and 7 times (90 versus 105)…⅔ of the 15 is before the 100, so you're at 6.67%!

(edited)

Was this answer helpful?
Cristian
Expert
Content Creator
replied on Oct 17, 2022
#1 rated MBB & McKinsey Coach

Hi there, 

Two other things that you can try:

1. Rounding the number in the calculation e.g., 37/587 into 40/600, which makes it significantly easier. 

2. Actually calculating the number :) Calculating it only takes a few seconds more and then you have the certainty that it's correct. Nobody expect you to be estimating and rounding all the time and often interviewers also see it as a sign of laziness.

Best,

Cristian

Was this answer helpful?
Pedro gave the best answer

Pedro

CoachingPlus Expert
Premium + Coaching Expert
30% off in April 2024 | Bain | EY-Parthenon | Roland Berger | Market Sizing | DARDEN MBA
132
Meetings
16,240
Q&A Upvotes
54
Awards
5.0
21 Reviews