Schedule mock interviews on the Meeting Board, join the latest community discussions in our Consulting Q&A and find like-minded Interview Partners to connect and practice with!
Back to overview

How do you estimate percentages?

Strangely, I haven't found a lot on that one on the internet (mostly videos clearly geared towards school children). 

My issue: I am good at case math and good with numbers in general. Where I do have an issue - depending on the numbers - is to estimate a percent increase / decrease on the fly. This can be super useful to interpret a number quickly after you come up with it (and where it would sound ridicolous to take another 20 seconds to calculate it fully through in your head). 

Ofc I know the typical tricks (i.e. if multiply the denominator close to 10 or 100 etc.) but sometimes I get really weird numbers, such as 37/587  where it is not really obvious at first. The only thing I could deduce here is tht it is between 5% and 10% (since 5% of 58 is 29 and 10% 58) 

When I interview candidates I realize that flaw as well, i.e. most gravitate towards “it is a 50% percent decrease” even though when its much closer to 40%. 

How do you handle that in general?

4
900+
10
Be the first to answer!
Nobody has responded to this question yet.
Top answer
Pedro
Coach
on Oct 17, 2022
Bain | EY-Parthenon | Former Principal | 1.5h session | 30% discount 1st session

Let me suggest a different approach. You never know which one works best for you. This one requires you having a good grasp of the multiplication table.

1. 37/587 = 0,37 / 5,87 = 37% / 5,87

2. 37% / 5,87 → 37% /

3. 37% is pretty close to 36%

4. 36% / 6 = 6%

What I want to highlight here is that while you always want to round the denominator, doing the same on the numerator may not always be the best option. If you round up to 40 you are going to be less precise than “rounding” down to 36. 

While 36 is not round… 36/6 is round! Much easier than 40/6

By the way, with this process you are likely to be more accurate than with rounding both numerator and denominator.

Having said this, both are acceptable during the interview. Use whatever works for you.

edited on Oct 16, 2022
Ex-BCG Principal | 8+ years consulting experience in SEA | BCG top interviewer & top performer

Hello,

I can suggest 2 methods that have worked for me:
 

1) Round both numbers

  • In your example of 37/587, I would round that to 40/600
  • This whole number fraction is a much more familiar number and easier to ‘memorize’ if need be
  • 40/600 = 6.67%; 37/587 = 6.3%

2) Round the denominator and estimate multiples based on a fraction of that

  • So to take your example again, my thought process would have been: 37/587 is 37/600 → 1% of 600 is 6 → 6 * 6 is ~36 which is closest to 37, so the answer is ~6%


In both methods, its also useful to take note of the magnitude/direction that you round the numbers, that can affect the magnitude of error (though most often slightly).

Lastly, as an interviewer, if you had used method #1 and answered ~7% instead of 6.3%, i wouldn't really have cared. In terms of % and quant more generally, what I look out more for is 

  1. Order of magnitude errors → i.e. if the answer should be a clear single digit, and the candidate gives a double digit
  2. Speed and accuracy of the actual calculation → i.e. if you come up with an answer quickly, and I ask you to explain how you came up with that number, it should match your formula

Other coaches may also suggest other useful methods that have worked for them. In the meantime, happy to answer any further questions on any of my points

Ian
Coach
edited on Oct 17, 2022
Top US BCG / MBB Coach - 5,000 sessions |Tech, Platinion, Big 4 | 9/9 personal interviews passed | 95% candidate success

Hi there,

It's really quite simple - you should round here (and confirm with the interviewer).

37/587 is like 40/600. That's like 20/300 which is like 10/150, which is like 1/15. 

15 goes into 100 between 6 and 7 times (90 versus 105)…⅔ of the 15 is before the 100, so you're at 6.67%!

on Oct 17, 2022
#1 rated McKinsey Coach

Hi there, 

Two other things that you can try:

1. Rounding the number in the calculation e.g., 37/587 into 40/600, which makes it significantly easier. 

2. Actually calculating the number :) Calculating it only takes a few seconds more and then you have the certainty that it's correct. Nobody expect you to be estimating and rounding all the time and often interviewers also see it as a sign of laziness.

Best,

Cristian

Similar Questions
Consulting
Just did the Mckinsey Solve Game (January 2025) - got some questions/insights
on Apr 24, 2025
Global
5
3.2k
Top answer by
Hagen
Coach
#1 recommended coach | >95% success rate | 8+ years consulting, 8+ years coaching and 7+ years interviewing experience
35
5 Answers
3.2k Views
+2
Consulting
Has anyone tried any of the AI Interview Tools for MBB before?
on Mar 25, 2025
Global
10
13.4k
Top answer by
Iman
Coach
Systemiq | Ex-BCG | 10 years experience with 8+ specialising in sustainability | Free Intro | Ex-PrepLounge candidate
348
10 Answers
13.4k Views
+7
Consulting
Employment Gap on Resume and How to talk about it during Interview
on Apr 14, 2025
Global
9
7.7k
Top answer by
Ariadna
Coach
BCG | Project Leader and Experienced Interviewer | MBA at London Business School
110
9 Answers
7.7k Views
+6
How likely are you to recommend us to a friend or fellow student?
0 = Not likely
10 = Very likely
Thanks for your feedback! Your opinion helps us make PrepLounge even better.