Paul

WHY ME vs. OTHER COACHES IN THIS PLATFORM

1. Higher MBB Seniority vs. most coaches on platforms and ex-BCG interviewer

2. My method UBER-worked for me as a post-MBA candidate (6 offer out of 6 applications from non-target school)

Secured 6 offers out of 6 applications from BCG, Bain, Strategy&, ATK, AlixPartners, LEK (disclaimer: did not apply to McK 😊 ) from a non-target MBA school

3. Track record – Success rate > 95% and Happy clients

My KPIs @ today (cross-platforms)
- BCG: 57 successful candidates / 60 coached* (95%)
- Other consultancies: 67/70 successful candidates coached* (96%)
Reference list of happy clients SMS / messages available upon request (See below examples)

4. Higher “bang for the buck”

My typical session lasts > 2 hours. I have no watches + I am not here for the money

HIGHLIGHT OF MY PROGRAM (detailed pdf available upon request)

CV Review: using MBB CV templates
1. Cover letter review: using MBB cover letter templates
2. Network your way in: how to use linkedin + other platform to get a referral to MBBs in < 1 month
Baseline: 360-degree assessment session (> 2 hours) with development of tailored study plan
Standard MBB “study plans” (< 15 days to interview, > 30 days to interview up to 120 days to interview)
Market-sizing “demystifying” (Part 1+2): proven approaches to finally tackle any possible shape of form of market sizing
Case Framework deep-dive:
- Detailed xls w/ tailored case framework shaped from MBB content
- The framework “mindset” – how you will not need frameworks anymore
Problem solving training
- Problem solving trained as delivered in MBB – beyond the available books (sorry Pyramid Principle)
Communication skills: how to be your “best self” during the interview process – subtle nuances included: being perceived as a colleague vs. a candidate
Fit interview leapfrog program: the most underestimated yet powerful way to stand-out
- “I have done my homework”: tailored responses to avoid sounding like a robotic generic candidate
- The “story matrix” (MBB Alumni resources) vs. fit questions
- Going beyond the “STAR” method