I apologise if this question comes across as uninformed or lazy.
I'm in an awkward position where I have too much work experience for entry level roles, but underqualified for more senior roles. For context: I have around 4.5 years of work experience, primarily in the HR and Rewards space, and I’m applying for consulting roles in the Southeast Asia region.
From my research on MBB roles, I’ve come across the following requirements for external hires:
McKinsey
- Business Analyst: <4 years of experience (source: McKinsey website)
- Junior Associate: >5 years of experience (source: LinkedIn profiles)
- Associate: >6 years of experience (source: LinkedIn profiles)
BCG
- Associate: <3 years in top-tier firms (source: BCG website, friends)
- Consultant: >6 years in top-tier firms (source: BCG website)
Bain
- Associate Consultant: <4 years of experience (source: LinkedIn profiles, friends)
- Consultant: >6 years of experience (source: LinkedIn profiles)
Since I fall somewhere in between these experience ranges, I’m not sure how to position myself. Should I still be applying for entry level roles? At the same time, I don’t feel fully confident applying for more senior positions. It could be that years of experience may not be a major factor that matters in these decisions, but I'm not privy to hiring decisions. I’m also wondering whether recruiting teams might consider candidates for alternative roles even if they did not initially apply for those specific positions (e.g., applied for Associate, considered for Consultant).
Would appreciate any input on this. Thanks!