Hi there,
I just completed a final round interview with one of the MBBs today, and I would say it went fairly well. Some details:
I connected well with both of my interviewers, with behaviorals and case feeling very conversational and collaborative, and the last few minutes for questions being very targeted to their industry expertise and I drew from recent trends. They reacted well and had great personal connections with me too. One of them says he enjoyed the conversation and looks forward to see what’s next, and the other says they will reach back out to me soon. The interviews were scheduled for 45 minutes, and for both I finished the case around 35-40 minutes.
One concern that I have though is that I reflected back on my math calculations and realized that I did ROI as (Amount Gained/Amount Invested) rather than the (Net Gain/Amount Invested) for both cases. I interpreted them as normal and correct logic, just with >100% being worth it and negative returns otherwise. I did not receive any pointers or corrections in this process from either partners, and I was wondering if this would make or break the interview.
Would appreciate any perspectives! I know that there is no way to assess, but I’d love to hear if memorizing formulas is a big part of this process, and what your opinion would be based on the description. Thank you!
Really appreciate your kind words so far and I look forward to hearing from you!