Verabrede dich zum Casen über das Meeting-Board, nimm an Diskussionen in unserem Consulting Q&A teil und finde gleichgesinnte Interview-Partner:innen, um dich auszutauschen und gemeinsam zu üben!
Zurück zur Übersicht

Breakeven Point

Is the breakeven point calculated correctly?

This is the citation from the expected answer:

  • Short time frame until breakeven point, with less than 4 years (total investment: 1,68m €; annual profit: 424k €)

The used annual profit is including the depreciation. When using 704k € (750k € electricity margin - 46k € annual fixed cost) instead, the amortization duration is 2,39 years.

Should I use annual profit with or without depreciation?

4
100+
7
Schreibe die erste Antwort!
Bisher hat niemand auf diese Frage reagiert.
Beste Antwort
Alessa
Coach
am 26. Aug. 2025
30% September discount | xMcKinsey & Company | xBCG | xRB | >400 coachings | feel free to schedule an intro call

Hey there :)

For a breakeven or payback period calculation, you normally use cash flow, not accounting profit. Depreciation is a non-cash expense, so it should not reduce the amount available to “pay back” the initial investment. That means you should calculate with the profit before depreciation (in your case 704k €), which gives you the 2.39 years.

If you include depreciation, you’re mixing in an accounting perspective, which is more relevant for ROI or net income analysis, not for breakeven/payback.

So: for breakeven → without depreciation.

best, Alessa :)

Lukas
Coach
bearbeitet am 26. Aug. 2025
50% OFF on first 2 sessions | ~10yrs in consulting | ex-BCG Project Leader | Personalized prep & coaching | INSEAD MBA

Hi Niklas,

I would use annual profit without depreciation (704k €) for payback period calculation.

Reasoning: Payback period measures time to recover actual cash investment. Depreciation is a non-cash accounting allocation of the same initial investment - including it double-counts the investment cost.

From my POV the cited 4-year figure incorrectly includes depreciation, artificially inflating the payback period.

Best,
Lukas

Evelina
Coach
bearbeitet am 26. Aug. 2025
EY-Parthenon (7 years) l BCG offer holder l 7+ years coaching l 30% off first session l free 15' intro call l LBS

Hi there,

For a breakeven calculation, you should use profit before depreciation — meaning exclude depreciation from costs. Depreciation is a non-cash expense, while breakeven analysis is about how long it takes to recover the actual cash investment.

  • If you use profit including depreciation, you’ll overestimate the breakeven period, since you’re deducting a non-cash charge.
  • If you use profit before depreciation, you get a more accurate view of the payback period, which is why the 2.39 years (using €704k) is the correct calculation.

Best,

Evelina

Margot
Coach
am 26. Aug. 2025
10% discount for 1st session I Ex-BCG, Accenture & Deloitte Strategist | 6 years in consulting I Free Intro-Call

Hi Niklas,

When you calculate the breakeven or payback period, what matters is cash actually coming in and out, not accounting numbers that include depreciation. Depreciation is only a book entry and does not affect how quickly you recover the initial investment. In your case, you should therefore use the 704k € figure, because it represents the real cash flow available to pay back the 1.68m € investment. With that, the payback time is about 2.4 years.

Example
Imagine you buy a machine for 100k €. Each year the machine generates 30k € in net cash. On the books, you also record 10k € of depreciation per year.

  • If you use profit including depreciation (30k – 10k = 20k), you would think it takes 5 years to pay back.
  • If you use actual cash (30k), the real payback is 3.3 years.

That is why for breakeven or payback analysis you always use the version without depreciation.