Hi all!
How do aptitude tests differ from or are similar to one another? From what I've heard is the RB and Kearney test similar to the Bain test, is that correct? And what can I expect from OW and S& assessments?
Many thanks in advance.
Hi all!
How do aptitude tests differ from or are similar to one another? From what I've heard is the RB and Kearney test similar to the Bain test, is that correct? And what can I expect from OW and S& assessments?
Many thanks in advance.
Honestly, it's rather difficult to map them, especially as they change quite often, and then they sometimes also differ between regions. Plus, they then also differ between roles at the same firm. It's a mess, honestly.
The good news, though, is that the differences between most of them are really small.
I would try to reach out to the recruiter and ask for more details about the test if I were you. Specifically ask them what the format is, whether they have an example that and whether they recommend practising they could share from any particular place.
Then, once you have a specific firm in mind, you can use the Q&A section here to narrow in on what format that firm uses (perhaps giving us some context on the role you're applying for as well).
You can then be a bit more targeted with how you approach your prep, but even so, you'll still benefit and learn loads by practising across formats.
Best,
Cristian
Hi there,
The tests are broadly similar as they all check logic, numeracy, and pattern recognition with some differences in format. Bain, RB, and Kearney are quite alike (data interpretation + quick math). OW and S& tend to mix in more business context or verbal reasoning. Overall, if you’re solid on mental math and interpreting charts fast, you’ll be in good shape across all of them.
Hi there,
Good question — the aptitude and online tests vary quite a bit across firms, even if they seem similar on the surface. Here’s a quick overview:
Bain – Typically uses the Sova or Pymetrics-style business reasoning test. You’ll see short case-style questions with charts, tables, and basic math. It’s about speed and logic rather than advanced calculations.
Roland Berger (RB) – Yes, it’s quite similar to Bain’s. You’ll get quantitative reasoning and verbal interpretation questions based on short business passages or charts. It tests structured thinking, not deep business knowledge.
Kearney – Also close in style to Bain/RB, though sometimes a bit heavier on numerical reasoning. Think SHL-style: ratios, percentages, and logical pattern recognition within a business context.
Oliver Wyman (OW) – Uses a more math- and data-focused online assessment, often resembling GMAT Integrated Reasoning. Expect chart analysis, percentage changes, and logic-based questions framed around a mini business scenario.
Strategy& (S&) – Varies by region. In EMEA, the test often feels like a mix between Bain’s Sova and an SHL numerical reasoning test. In some offices, they’ve started using gamified assessments (similar to Pymetrics).
Best,
Evelina