expert
Expert with best answer

Marco-Alexander

100% Recommendation Rate

36 Meetings

162 Q&A Upvotes

USD 219 / Coaching

WHY or HOW

Anonymous A asked on Aug 29, 2019 - 4 answers

Shall i make a structure on how to fix a problem or structure to find why the problem occurs?

Let's say a case comes about "bad quality education", should i structure to see WHY the education is bad or should i make a structure on HOW i can fix it and make better education?

Or does it matter since they are similar both would be OK?

What do you think?

4 answers

  • Upvotes
  • Date ascending
  • Date descending
Best Answer
Marco-Alexander
Expert
updated his answer on Sep 01, 2019
Former BCG | Case author for efellows book | Experience in 6 consultancies (Stern Stewart, Capgemini, KPMG, VW Con., Horvath, zeb)
Book a coaching with Marco-Alexander

100% Recommendation Rate

36 Meetings

162 Q&A Upvotes

USD 219 / Coaching

Hi Anonym A,

first comes the analysis phase (--> Why does the problem occur?) and then comes the solution phase (--> How can we solve it?).

A third phase could be the implementation of the solution.

Best regards
Marco-Alexander

(edited)

Vlad
Expert
updated his answer on Aug 29, 2019
McKinsey / Accenture / Got all BIG3 offers / More than 300 real MBB cases / Harvard Business School
Book a coaching with Vlad

98% Recommendation Rate

359 Meetings

5,132 Q&A Upvotes

USD 229 / Coaching

Hi,

It depends on the case and you should clarify the objective clearly.

  • In 80% of the cases, there will be some problem and first, you have to find the root cause of the problem (WHY), and then think HOW to fix it
  • Some cases start with HOW question - mostly non-profit and non-conventional cases. (E.g. How you can increase the revenues from tourism in the city?) This situation is very typical with interviewer-led cases at McKinsey. In that case, you can start directly with HOW

Even if you start with HOW question, you still need to challenge the existing situation. e.g. if we are hired to develop a new bankruptcy law, and the question is how you would approach it, your first step will be to do the diagnostics of the current law.

Best!

(edited)

John
Expert
replied on Aug 29, 2019
Ex Bain Case Team Leader I Focus on Private Equity I +80 interviews conducted at Bain I All cases based on real life cases
Book a coaching with John

100% Recommendation Rate

66 Meetings

45 Q&A Upvotes

USD 259 / Coaching

How can you fix a problem without knowing why it occurs? So your structure should be to 1) understand the problem(s) 2) find approaches to fix it and go beyond

Hope this helps ;)

I dont' think we are on the same page. Let me rephrase the question. Say our client has a land and now they want it to be green. I can either make a structure like WHY it's not green A) It's not green intentionally B) It's not un-intentionally & keep on breaking down the WHYs. — Anonymous A on Aug 29, 2019

OR i can make a structure on HOW i can make the field green by making again a MECE structure saying A) How can i make the ground green B) How can i plant additional stuff C) How can i sustain they are green all around the year....& continue decomposing by saying i can lay down grass, i can plant trees & so.. — Anonymous A on Aug 29, 2019

Deniz
Expert
replied on Aug 29, 2019
BCG | A.T. Kearney | University of Cambridge | 150+ coachees | 5+ years of consulting experience in London, Dubai and Istanbul
Book a coaching with Deniz

100% Recommendation Rate

89 Meetings

246 Q&A Upvotes

USD 169 / Coaching

Hi,

In fact, you need to do WHY and HOW respectively. So to continue your example, you need to first diagnose the problem (and understand the root cause), thus you should first ask WHY the education is bad. Following this, you need to move on to HOW to fix the problem.

Best,

Deniz